Volume 2 (October 14, 2022)
Volume 2 has 314 pages of testimony. 22 people spoke before the Commission, including 6 witnesses.
Very important disclaimer: testimony from this site should not be taken as authoritative; check the relevant public hearing for verbatim quotes and consult the associated transcript for the original written text. For convenience, testimony includes links directly to the relevant page (where a speaker started a given intervention) in the original PDF transcripts.
The testimony below is converted from the PDF of the original transcript, prepared by Maxime Roussy.
Speakers, by number of times they spoke:
- Mathieu Fleury, Councillor - City of Ottawa (Ott) (spoke 313 times)
- Catherine McKenney, Councillor - City of Ottawa (Ott) (spoke 282 times)
- Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel - Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC) (spoke 273 times)
- Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director - Vanier Business Improvement Area (Vanier BIA) (spoke 236 times)
- Brendan Miller, Counsel - Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers (spoke 195 times)
- Zexi Li - Ottawa residents (spoke 158 times)
- Paul Champ, Counsel - Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses (spoke 139 times)
- Kevin McHale, Executive Director - Spark Street Business Improvement Area and Mall Authority (Sparks BIA) (spoke 115 times)
- Tom Curry, Counsel - Peter Sloly (spoke 103 times)
- David Migicovsky, Counsel - Ottawa Police Service / City of Ottawa (Ott-OPS) (spoke 99 times)
- Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel - Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC) (spoke 93 times)
- Paul Rouleau, Commissioner - Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC) (spoke 75 times)
- Jessica Barrow, Counsel - Ottawa Police Service / City of Ottawa (Ott-OPS) (spoke 72 times)
- Rob Kittredge, Counsel - Democracy Fund / Citizens for Freedom / Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms Coalition (DF / CfF / JCCF) (spoke 67 times)
- Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel - Government of Canada (GC) (spoke 62 times)
- Victoria De La Ronde - Ottawa residents (spoke 57 times)
- The Registrar - Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC) (spoke 20 times)
- Alyssa Tomkins, Counsel - City of Ottawa (Ott) (spoke 8 times)
- John Mather, Counsel - Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC) (spoke 4 times)
- The Clerk - Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC) (spoke 4 times)
- Unidentified speaker (spoke 3 times)
- Jeffrey Leon, Co-lead Counsel - Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC) (spoke 1 time)
Upon commencing on Friday, October 14, 2022 at 9:30 a.m.
The Registrar (POEC)
Order. À l’ordre. The Public Order Emergency Commission is now in session. La Commission sur l’état d’urgence est maintenant ouverte.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Bonjour. Good morning. Welcome, to Day 2. Bienvenue à la deuxième journée, and our first day of live witnesses. Before I call on the witnesses, there are just a couple of matters I want to raise. The first is the -- what the public and the media know, in particular, with respect to exhibits. I may have mislead people yesterday in calling Exhibits 1, 2, and 3. As the parties know, the documents that become exhibits are put into the database that's available to the public in accordance with their unique document number, not as exhibits. And it's important to know that all the exhibits that go into the database that's available for the public, all the documents are not necessarily referred to in the hearing, in the sense that there are many documents that will become part of the record, either because they were referred to in the overview reports you heard yesterday, so that not only the overview report goes into the record but all of the documentation that supports that. Same thing for other types of reports or affidavits or witness statements, when they go into evidence, we -- what we have arranged, if you like, is that all the backup goes in so that the full record will be composed not only of documents referred to here, but documents referred to in the backup documentation. So a little bit complicated, but it's simply to alert the media and the public that when you go to the website of the Commission, you'll find a lot more documents that back up the statements and the evidence. The parties know this because the parties have been provided these documents, have reviewed them, and they may question witnesses about them, but it's a much more fulsome record. Because of the timelines we have, we couldn't spent days noting documents and putting in all of that evidence. The contentious evidence you will hear at the hearing. Don't worry about that, the parties will ensure that. La deuxième chose que j’aimerais soulever, c'est qu’il n’est pas permis d’enregistrer ou de diffuser de vos téléphones, et cetera, en salle. There is no livestreaming allowed or a recording of the proceedings. It is livestreamed by the Commission, but people should not be doing this from their own phones. So with that brief introduction, there are -- this, according to the schedule, will be a busy day. It -- if it goes according to plan, we will not finish before seven o'clock tonight, so let's get started as soon as possible because we have scheduled a full day. It can be shorter if people shorten their cross-examinations, and we'll -- but obviously the times have been allocated and we'll hold people to it. So Commission Counsel, ready to go. Ms. Rodriguez.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Good morning, Commissioner. My name is Natalia Rodriguez, as you know. I'm Senior Commission Counsel to this Commission. And I am going to be calling our first witnesses to the Commission, Ms. Victoria De La Ronde and Ms. Zexi Li.
The Registrar (POEC)
Ms. De La Ronde, will you swear on a religious document or do you wish to affirm?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Religious document, please.
The Registrar (POEC)
With the Bible, the Koran?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
The Bible, please.
The Registrar (POEC)
Please take the Bible and hold it in your right hand. For the record, please state your full name and spell it out.
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
My name is Victoria De La Ronde, and Victoria, V-I-C-T-O-R-I-A, and De La Ronde is three words, capital D-E, capital L-A, capital R-O-N-D-E.
MS. VICTORIA De La RONDE, Sworn
The Registrar (POEC)
Ms. Li, will you swear on a religious document or do you wish to affirm?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I would like to affirm, please.
The Registrar (POEC)
For the record, please state your full name and spell it out.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
My full name is Zexi Li, spelled Z-E-X-I, last name, L-I.
MS. ZEXI LI, Affirmed
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay, the witnesses have been sworn.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you very much.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Just give a moment for the registrar to take back the Bible. Okay, go ahead.
EXAMINATION IN-CHIEF BY MS. NATALIA RODRIGUEZ
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Good morning, Ms. Li. Good morning, Ms. De La Ronde. Can you both confirm that you are residents of Ottawa.
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes, I am a resident of Ottawa.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, I am a resident of Ottawa.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Ms. De La Ronde, are you retired?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes, I am retired.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Ms. Li, what do you do for a living?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I am a federal public servant.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And do you both live alone?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And were you both in Ottawa during the protests of January and February of 2022?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Now, I want to speak a little bit about the impacts that living through the protests of January and February had on both of you. Ms. De La Ronde, can you describe for the Commissioner what was the impact, if any, on your physical well-being?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
The impact on my physical well-being was -- is quite extensive. I certainly during the experience had difficulty sleeping. I had an effect on my lungs and my throat because of the fumes and other smells, and I also have long-term effects.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Can you describe those for us?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
The long-term effects are loss of hearing, loss of balance, some vertigo triggered by the sound of any horn now, triggered by certain music as the music was very loud, and a physical trigger when I get a smell of gas. Both my throat and lungs start to feel infected. I had also a phantom horn blowing as an experience for a number of weeks after.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And to what do you attribute these physical impacts that you experienced?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Certainly, I attribute it to the very, very loud and constant noise from the horns, from the music, from the idling trucks. Even when the horns abated for a minute or two, the trucks idled. The trucks idled all night. And so it just was an assault on my hearing. And I can certainly tell now that there is a diminished function. I was able before to listen to media, for example, at a normal level of, say, four. Now I have to turn it to six.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And so can you confirm that you lived in the Centretown area or the downtown area? Maybe just give us a general sense of your location.
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes. I am near to Laurier.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And what was the impact, if any, on your mental wellbeing?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Well, certainly as I mentioned, it was such an experience of helplessness, especially during the event, where the horn blowing was so loud, and continuous. There was absolutely no place for me to go in my own unit, there was no place that had any less sound. I checked different rooms to see, well, maybe I can sleep on the floor here. There was no place that had a diminished sound. And if there was, it wasn't a space, like, a closet that was big enough to sleep in. There was just no escape to that. So I felt trapped and helpless during that. During the fireworks when the debris from the fireworks sprayed against my windows, I was just terrified that they would break any minute because I thought how could I do something, and what could I do at midnight, and who could come at midnight? And this is February. A broken window would have been pretty disastrous. So there was a lot of anxiety and discomfort.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And do these impacts on your mental wellbeing continue to this day or have they abated?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Certainly, they have - - some have abated, yes, and I worked very hard for that in terms of -- on the mental wellbeing. It still -- I jump a lot when I hear a loud horn, and also when I get this smell of gas, definitely, I have a physical to that -- reaction, which is quite distressing.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And, Ms. Li, I will ask you the same thing. What was the impact, if any, on your physical wellbeing of living through the protest of January and February of this year?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
During the time of the occupation - - I struggle to call it a protest because I know what a protest is, but it was incredibly difficult to get anything done because of the noise. There was a significant impact on things like focus and, you know, just even living day to day. Sleep deprivation was one of the first things that affected me personally and it also affected the animals that I live with as well. They seemed quite distressed. But for me personally, it was almost impossible to get a good night's sleep or a full night's sleep, if any, and if anything, it would be low quality and often interrupted by a sudden loud horn. And when it was quiet -- because there were brief periods where it was quiet, I was riddled with the anxiety that the horns were going to start again, and when the horns started again, it was left -- we were left wondering, you know, when they would stop, if they would ever stop again. And, yeah, it was just day-to-day living within my own home, living in fear of the sound and the intrusion really that they posed just being outside on our streets. Yeah, and further to that, it was unpleasant, to say the least, to exit my home, but it was something I did anyways as I didn't feel like it was -- the whole situation was wrong, and I felt almost a little bit of defiance, wanting to go outside and continue to live my life as best I could. And when I did, oftentimes, I was harassed for wearing a mask or being -- I was told to smile more under my mask, or, you know, just these kinds of comments that wouldn't have otherwise occurred and on a quiet, normal walk day-by-day. And I think what was one of the worst things was whenever you chose -- well, whenever I chose not to engage with the individuals that were occupying my neighbourhood, they would blast their horns at me with a smile on their faces, and then they would cheer in unison and almost take joy in the -- in my flinching, at my recoiling from the noise that I had been essentially experiencing non-stop for the entire duration of the events that occurred.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And so can you confirm as well that you live in the downtown area south of Wellington?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, I live near Laurier Street and Centretown.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Ms. De La Ronde, can you describe for us the impact, if any, of living through the protests in Ottawa on your ability to go about your daily life?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes. I work very hard to be independent and safe as a person with a disability. That objective is very important to me and every success in reaching that objective is coveted. So that was gone. I was trained to walk with the traffic, to walk with the flow, to negotiate and keep myself safe on the street. Of course, there was no traffic or no flow, no indicator, or if it's idling, I wasn't sure if these big vehicles overhanging a small sidewalk, if they decided to suddenly shift or change, if they could see me, so it was terrifying. The sound was so high that I could not hear any chimes or signals that we use at the ends of the street to tell us that it's safe to cross. That was just not available, so it was -- it just was not safe in my world. Also, in terms of independence, I do everything myself. I order my groceries. I order prescriptions. And but -- and I take public transportation or private transportation to go to meetings, to go to appointments, to do my daily business. So I had everything set up for myself as an independent person, living alone in downtown Ottawa, which provided such good services. But immediately, immediately, there was no taxi, no Uber, no Para Transpo, no grocery delivery, which I depended on, no taxi even to go and get some, no prescription delivery. Some way had to be figured out how to obtain all the necessities of life. The restrictions on my ability to get food was gone -- or was there, I -- so that was the impact in terms of my mobility, so I found myself trapped.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And can I confirm, Ms. De La Ronde, I noticed you walk with a white cane. Can you confirm, do you have a visual impairment?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And does that visual impairment then cause you to rely on sounds and hearing in order to get around outside?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
That is a huge, huge assist for me to have safe mobility outside and for me to remain independent. Yes. Very critical are the sounds.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And so how did the sounds change then from kind of normal day to day to when the protest was happening in January and February?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
There was absolutely no ability to negotiate my environment by using sound. The sounds of the horns, the sounds of the very, very loud music, the sounds of the people, with lots of voices coming from all different places, all was disconcerting and just completely eliminated my ability to negotiate my environment independently.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Ms. Li, can you describe for us what you saw, what you heard, what you experienced when you did go outside and walk the streets during the protest?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Well it was the middle of winter, so really the first thing you noticed when you stepped outside was all of the snow, because services were unable to be rendered due to the occupation that was going on. And further to that, the snow was often coloured yellow or brown due to the public urination and defecation that took place gratuitously, often alongside of my building and just, quite literally, anywhere you walked, on every corner. And on these intersections, often times there were illegal bonfires and yeah, just trash burning right next to, you know, cans of fuel or near the same areas where these individuals would later set off fireworks. And I just remember feeling like it was such a surreal sight. It almost felt like you were in something like the purge because it -- although I didn’t often see direct acts of violence, it was -- there was a certain chaos on the streets and that feeling of chaos and rule breaking and law breaking gradually increased as things progressed. Yeah. Just I need a moment. Just sort of on my daily walks, you know, going to the gym, getting groceries, running errands, we often -- I often encountered individuals that were associated with the occupation and being -- you know, I’m a small Asian woman. I wore a mask most of the time due to the situation that was going on. It was -- like I said, it made you a target because it signaled to the people on our streets that we were not supportive of their cause and that we were not one of them. And in turn, as I mentioned before, they would increase their honking, and target their honking, and shout at us, shout at me, about how they were doing things for us and that they were fighting for our freedoms when, at the same time, I was unable to walk the streets feeling safe, really, because it wasn’t -- I didn’t feel safe. You know, my guard was up all the time and you had to watch every detail so carefully because these people would just approach me out of nowhere. And you didn’t -- you really didn’t know what they were going to do to you, and especially after I took action as an individual, it became different being a person walking on the streets. But I was never deterred from going outside. There was one -- only one moment where I was very, very afraid after my identity and name had been made public. And I had really covered myself up completely so that I was completely unrecognizable, to the point where my neighbours saw this and were very confused when I said hello to them. But after that, I think I realized there was almost a protection in the notoriety that I’d gained, and I don’t know, I felt like it was almost safer for me to walk the streets than the people that I lived around because of my position in the whole situation. With that being said, like, when it comes to my day-to-day life, I’m a really friendly person. I know all of my neighbours. Well, I can’t say all of them, you know, but I know a good few of them. And one of -- like, really, one of the -- my, like, daily joys is chit chatting with them in the elevator and seeing them on the street and saying hello. And what was truly, truly terrible about this time was seeing how people I knew were being affected, and knowing that for every one person that I knew that was going through a difficult time because of what was going on, there were 20 other people that I didn’t know that were going through the same thing. I knew people that were being pushed out of their homes because they were literally having mental breakdowns because of the stress and the noise and just the terror they felt from the situation. And I don’t think anyone or anything can discount those real feelings that people experienced and people had. And because of the action I took, I had encouraged a lot of my friends and neighbours to reach out to me and tell me their stories because it was so important for people to know that this was a serious thing that was going on, that people were being really terribly affected by it. One of my neighbours, she had just had a new born baby. Her name is Hazel. She was maybe six months old at this time, but I remember -- like, I’ve watched Hazel. She’s a really sweet baby. But my friend, she had told me that the noise was so terrible that sometimes just to get her to sleep, she had to take the baby out into the hallway, as far from the windows as possible, and bounce her in the hallways to try and get her to sleep before bringing her back into the apartment, where there was just the unrelenting horns. And other neighbours who told me for just, you know, a good two/three hours of nap, whatever they could get, they would go down to the parking lot and sleep in their car because it was the only place that they could escape to. And for me, second to the hallway, my bathroom was a little quieter, so I got some peace there as well.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So would you say that you felt unsafe walking the streets?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I didn’t feel safe, but it’s hard to describe it as unsafe at the same time, because I was actively being so cognizant of my surroundings. I’m fast. I can move very fast. So, you know, I’m -- I was always ready to, you know, take myself out of a situation where something might happen. And, you know, a lot of the times, when they’re bouncing their trucks and their cars and -- I don’t know how to describe it other than, like, roaring at us, like, roaring at me with, like, these large giant vehicles. You know, it’s -- the idea was to move quick and get where we needed to go. And, you know, that was the intention, and that’s what you really had to do, I think, to stay safe, because when you didn’t take your time, they would always get to you. Like, not -- maybe not in the sense that you’re thinking, but they would try and come up to you and convince you that they were doing the right thing. And they would say to me -- like they -- I -- like, on more than one occasion, I would try and plead with them because, you know, there’s a certain desperation in being left in that kind of situation where the people that are supposed to help you weren’t helping you, and it was just ongoing for really -- it was going to be an unknown period of time, because really, every day I woke up and I hoped that it was over, and it never was. Sorry, I lost my train of thought a little there.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
That’s okay. Ms. De La Ronde, would you say that you felt unsafe walking the streets?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes. For two reasons. One, of course, the inability to negotiate those streets safely, because of lack of assisted -- well, lack of sound was the big thing. Also, being very concerned about what was underfoot, because there was debris on the streets, and it was winter, and icy, and slippery. And then always vigilant that someone was going to approach. On an occasion, there was a person who kept jumping in front of me. I was with someone else. I could only go out if someone came with me. And this person kept jumping in front and didn't allow me to pass. So when he was confronted, finally it stopped, but then sent messages, "Well, I love you anyway", he said. So that was a bit intimidating. And so in that way I didn't feel safe for those two reasons. I didn't have all the faculties I normally use; and secondly, that someone was going to approach me and either I was going to be accidentally hurt or I would -- or my big worries that I would bump into and hurt them too. So always vigilant and concerned. Does that mean I was feeling safe? No. No, I wasn't. I just thought if I didn't have to be out I would not go out.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Ms. De La Ronde, was there anything else that you experienced that you would consider to be a threat to health or safety?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
The Sunday after the - - that the vehicles came in and occupied so close to where I lived, the relentless noise was just so unbearable and I was so exhausted from it. And I called and begged a friend, "Could you just please -- I know you have to walk in and get me out, can you just please come and get me out?" And she did, and two days later, I had -- we both had COVID. There was so many people on the street, walking toward us, saying we don't have to wear those masks. There was just people around. Did I get it from them? I don't know, you know, but it meant that I was completely, completely stuck. I couldn't leave my home. I couldn't ask anybody to come and help. I couldn't go and stay with somebody else. I couldn't do anything. I had to be there to isolate for at least those 10 days. So once again, there was no place to go, no place to hide, it just went on and on.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Ms. Li, what actions, if any, did you take because of your disruptions to your daily life?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Well, the first action I took was really what I consider to be -- it was really important to me, I think. Because of the nature of the occupation and what was going around the media and the news, I thought it was really important for me to walk the streets and experience things firsthand. So I did. I did that almost every day, and I took pictures, and I took videos, and I remembered what I saw. And I spoke with people. I spoke with the people that were living on our streets legally, I spoke with the people that were stationed on intersections to protect us. And ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Sorry, do you mean the police?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, the police. And I just -- that was really the first action I took, just having my own account of things and really living through it myself. And like I said before, I really genuinely, like, love Ottawa, I love my neighbours, and they mean a lot to me, even if they are somewhat strangers in a sense. And because of this closeness I had, I heard a lot of their stories, and more so, I heard a lot of their frustrations. And as egg-throwing began to occur from my building, I felt that, you know, we really needed a medium to at least express what was happening to us so that we could feel, at the very least, heard and maybe diffuse some of the tensions.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Can you describe -- sorry, can you describe what you mean by the egg-throwing?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Well, you know, there were very large trucks parked everywhere, and in some of these instances they were parked right next to some high-rise condo buildings. And as a result, someone -- some people may have gotten some cartons of eggs, and you know, had their little retaliation in frustration because, really, what else could they do. And when that incident occurred, I remember the police actually came to my building to enquire about the egg-throwing, as a complaint had been made by the truckers. And I remember that I felt it as an affront, and that a lot of my neighbours felt it as an affront as well when they were investigating something like this in the light of everything that was happening to us, and what they were really ignoring in a lot of their statements and releases to the public. And as a result, I decided to organise a meeting with a number of residents in my building with some Ottawa Police community liaison officers, just so we could have a recorded account of what our experiences were, and really to, again, diffuse the tension, and really concretely say, "You know what's happening here. We are telling you this. This is our experience, and we really desperately need help because things are -- things have gone on too long." And the residents, honestly, they had wanted to fight back because they felt that nobody else was doing anything for them.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And what was the result of that meeting?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Following that meeting, maybe twenty of my neighbours showed up, and more had sent their stories through messages or otherwise through me. And we had communicated everything to the officers so that, you know, again, it was recorded. And you know, all of us were there to attest to the fact that this happened, and they know what's going on, because we felt really and truly abandoned at that point in time. And after that, I ended up becoming the lead plaintiff in the class action, which brought my name and person to more public attention.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay, so we'll get to that in a little bit. I just wanted to get a sense, for the honking, you both mentioned the sound of the honking. Do you have a sense for when it was -- was it -- was it all the time, was it louder during the day, was it just as loud at night? Can you give us a sense of that, Ms. Li, and then Ms. De La Ronde?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
It was -- it's -- sometimes it's hard because that whole month, essentially, feels like a bit of a blur sometimes, but I do remember when it started on Friday night, it felt like in my memory that it never stopped, really.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So would that be Friday, the 27th of January?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes. That's when they began to roll in. And I remember when that happened that was -- my feeling was that this is going to be a doozy, you know, bad things are coming. But yeah, it was constant. It was like, from day to night, even if it wasn't for every second, it was at least every other minute.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay, thank you. Ms. De La Ronde, do you have a sense for when the honking was louder? Was it constant 24 hours a day, was it less at night, was it the same?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
When the trucks and other vehicles came into my area on the Friday evening, it was very loud. And on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, I could sense, I could sense the excitement and the electricity in the air. And at the beginning, I thought I am so happy to be in a country where there is freedom of expression, freedom of speech, freedom to assemble, but then that sentiment started to crumble as the loudness was all night and all that weekend. That's why I begged my friend, "Can you just come and take me out for a short time even so I don't have to hear this?" And the sounds continued constantly, until -- well, at night. And they may have been somewhat diminished because there was -- were crescendos all during the day, and toward the evening in particular, and then all night. When the injunction was put in place, then it abated a bit between 11 o'clock at night, and then 7 o'clock, I could hear activity out on the street. I could hear a huge megaphone starting to advise, it seemed to me, a rolling thunder of horn-blowing starting at 7:30 in the morning, and then the loud, loud music would, which you could hear every word of the music they were -- the songs that were being sung. So your question in terms of how loud it was, how continuous it was. It was continuous. There was an abatement of horn blowing in such a crescendo between those hours, 11:00 at night and 7:00 in the morning. But the idling continued under my window, just with these huge vehicles, the sound of the idling echoing down in the canyon of our buildings all night. So there was no respite from an assault on hearing. I tried to wear earplugs, but they kept falling out, and then I worried if I wore an earplug I wouldn’t be able to hear the smoke alarm, I wouldn’t be able to hear if somebody was pounding on my door to evacuate because there was something -- a fire or an explosion outside our door. So I was caught in between. And of course, I slept with a mask on because of the -- because trying to abate the smell of the diesel and the other smells that were coming up and in through the vents.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So I want to show a map now that’s been produced at Exhibit D of the Affidavit sworn by Aaron Bernard, and he’s the Managing Director of Spatial Media. And for the parties’ benefit it’s at document COM50736 if you want to look at that. So this was based on -- this map was created based on -- yeah, you can click on that -- based on data that was collected through the two weeks, the first two weeks of the convoy. And what we see here is just a standard traffic noise in Ottawa during the day, and this is just based on known decibel readings throughout the area, and the decibel readings were collected at different points in downtown Ottawa, and this is a visualization of that data that was collected. So if we go to week daytime -- week one daytime? Thank you. So this is what it shows on this map, based on the decimal ratings collected on the ground in different locations through the first week of the convoy. And if we just zoom in to -- it's a bit of a heat map, so the darker the colour the louder the decibels. And if you can zoom in a little bit more? Okay, that's good. And so, you had said. Ms. De La Ronde, that you live on Laurier, can you tell us approximately a close intersection that you would be by, just so we can locate that on the map?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes. Close would be Laurier and Kent.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Laurier and Kent?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So if we can just zoom in on Laurier and Kent? You just have to zoom in a bit there. Yeah, just move over to the left. Yeah. We’ve got Lion, we’ve got Kent, and that’s Laurier -- where’s Laurier? Right there, okay. Yeah. So Laurier and Kent we see between 90 decibels and if you go up, about, so between 90 and 100. Okay. And it says, similar to a lawn mower. Does that accord with your recollection of the sound? It says as loud as -- similar to a lawn mower.
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
For myself --
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yes.
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
-- it was beyond a lawnmower.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So you would say it was louder in your experience?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And Ms. Li, an intersection that you are near so we can kind of locate you on the map?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
The Intersection I live near would be Laurier Avenue West and Bank Street.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Laurier and Bank. Okay, so just over to the right a little bit on the mouse. Yeah, right there, that’s the corner. Okay. So again, similar, 100 to 110 decibels, similar to a lawnmower. does that accord with your kind of recollection of what it was like?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, however, I would like to note that there were points in time where, like Ms. De La Ronde said, there were crescendos, and during those crescendos in particular, there was a roving train horn attached to a truck and when that truck was in our area, I would express that it was much louder and much more disruptive than the lawn mower.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And we're going to hear one of the recordings. If you go down to the blue there, you can see some of the recordings that were taken, so that one is at 100 as well in that zone, so it's similar to the area that you were in in terms of the decibel readings. And we're just going to play it so that everyone here can experience a little bit of what you experienced. (Audio recording played)
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Does that accord with your recollection of the sounds when you were either in your building or walking outside, Ms. De La Ronde?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes, that does accord this sounds over always present in my building, in my unit. Except, there's some sounds there -- not there, that were even louder and more unnerving. When you hear this, and it's 24 hours it is just -- it’s damaging. It's damaging to the nerves, it's damaging to my health and well-being, so it’s -- it’s shocking. So it does accord, but there was more. There were times when it was more than this.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Do you agree with that, Ms. Li?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I would agree with that. I would note that many of the trucks in my vicinity had what we would describe as aftermarket horns, where the horns attached to the vehicle were much, much, louder than a standard vehicle would have, and several of these trucks were idled very close to where I lived and resulted in a much more deafening sound.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And Ms. Li, you had indicated that you took videos and photos when you walked around. I just want to take you to some of those photos if we can.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yeah.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
It’s COM00000713, and maybe you can just -- when it comes up -- describe to us what we’re seeing here, and when it was taken, and why you took the photo? It’s ending in 713. Okay, yeah. Let’s see the full -- yeah, there we go.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
So this photo was taken on the corner of Kent and Laurier. I took the photo because I thought that the removing of the tires was a very clear message from the occupiers that they were here to stay. Now, this vehicle in particular was removed sometime later, but I believe this was near the beginning of the occupation, perhaps around February 3rd.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. Thank you. And then the next photo is ending in 728, so COM00000728. Okay. And do you recall when this photo was taken and what we're seeing here?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I don’t remember the exact date, it was either February 17th or 18th, if I‘m not mistaken. This morning, this was after the injunction date, the occupiers on Kent Street, it was a very strong encampment, I would describe it as, and they were very much rooted in their position. During the injunction period there was a -- I believe this was like a Friday or Saturday morning, but they had collectively blown their horns at about 6:59 a.m. and obviously it awoke myself and many other residents in the area. At this point we had been, what, 20 days into the occupation, and I for one, was desperate -- not quite defeated -- but also very angry. And I think at that point the desperation was enough where I stood on the corner of Laurier and Kent, I left my home at about 7:30 and I stayed there for about 30 minutes to an hour just them to blow their horns, because I was frustrated and I wanted there to be evidence, first hand evidence, of them define the injection order, them breaking the laws they were breaking, and I wanted to know for myself who exactly was there, so that nobody could say otherwise. And I decided to take photos of the vehicles that were there, collect their information, and that was something that made them very upset as, really, it was in open, active defiance.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And is this truck parked on the sidewalk; is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, it is.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And was that common for trucks to be up parked on the sidewalks?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
At this time, it was. I also on numerous occasions witnessed trucks driving along the sidewalks as well.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And I see we are running out of time, so perhaps I will then invite parties to ask you additional questions. Thank you very much. Oh, before we go, is there anything else that you would like to tell the Commission? I do want to give you an opportunity if there's anything else we haven't discussed that you would like to discuss?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I would like to quickly note that in this image, the vehicle next to the white truck, the red truck, on this same day, due to my taking pictures, the man in the red truck was inside of his vehicle and he actually had backed his vehicle into me. I moved out of the way, but I presume it was for taking pictures of his license plate and what was in his vehicle. I also captured video of -- as I approached the vehicle after he had sort of backed into me. I didn't want him to be able to claim that it wasn't him in the vehicle, so I captured the driver in the video as well, and while I did so, he aggressively opened his door at me in the car. And at that point, all of the trucks in the area began blaring their horns at me. And there was another individual who had exited his vehicle and decided to start shouting at me, giving me the finger, and say that the man in the truck hadn't done anything, after I had called the police. He was yelling in the streets that the truck hadn't moved in over an hour, which I had direct video evidence proving that it was not true. So it just really showed to me personally that these people were willing to do anything and say anything to help each other get away with anything.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And, Ms. De La Ronde, is there anything we haven't covered that you would like to say?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
You know, I think you've done a very good job. Thank you very much.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. Thank you. And now I invite the parties to ask you some questions.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Now for cross- examination, have the parties agreed on an order for the cross- examination? Seeing no response, I will simply call on parties to cross-examine in accordance with the time that has been allocated. So I think the first cross-examination is to be carried out by the convoy organizers, so who's going to be doing this? Okay. So, Mr. Miller, you're on. You have 20 minutes if you need it and given that Commission Counsel has gone a bit over time, I -- we can give you a little bit of leeway, but not very much.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. BRENDAN MILLER
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
So good morning. Ms. Li, I'd like to start with you if that's okay. So, Ms. Li, I understand you're 21 years of age; is that correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I'm now 22.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Now 22. But at the time of the events in question in January and February of this year you were 21?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And you said already you're a public servant. You work for the Government of Canada?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, that's correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And you worked for the Government of Canada during the protest period; is that fair?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, that's correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And what do you do for your employment for the Government of Canada?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I'm a data analyst.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And with which Ministry or department are you with?
Jeffrey Leon, Co-lead Counsel (POEC)
Objection. What's the relevance of this line of questioning, Commissioner?
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
I'm not sure it's relevant or not, but is it -- it seems to me that it's not unreasonable.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Well, I personally don't feel there's -- I -- the actions I took was in my capacity as an individual citizen of Ottawa and not related to my work or any other activities.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right, I understand that, but what department were you with and what were you doing for work for the Government of Canada at the time?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I was a data analyst with Shared Services Canada.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Shared Services Canada?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And what Ministry does that come under?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I'm not sure.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. I understand that you know Ottawa City Councillor Catherine McKenney; is that correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And I also understand that you know NDP member of provincial parliament for Ottawa Centre Joel Harden; is that correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And from some public articles, I also understand that you were introduced to lawyer Mr. Paul Champ sometime between January 28th, 2022, and February 4th, 2022; is that correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Could you repeat the dates, please?
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
January 28th, 2022, and February 4th, 2022.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And what date were you introduced to Mr. Champ?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I believe it was a Friday, so whichever date that Friday fell on.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And so someone introduced you to Mr. Champ; correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Mr. Champ had reached out to me.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And is it not true that it was Ottawa City Councillor Catherine McKenney who put you in touch with Mr. Champ?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
That is untrue.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And I understand that you are the recent co-chair of the 2002 [sic] Leader Summit for Action Chinese Canadians Together; is that correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
That's correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And as part of that summit, I understand you gave a video statement of how you became who you are today; do you remember that?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And it focussed on the protest in Ottawa and became -- and becoming the lead plaintiff in the class action that you filed; is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And there you described becoming the lead plaintiff in a class action as a fateful and surreal story; is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And you said there you had the opportunity to make a difference; right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And you said that the lawyers needed a plaintiff.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And so you were asked to be the lead plaintiff; is that fair?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And was there anyone else other than Mr. Champ who was asking you to be the lead plaintiff?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Emilie Taman who works with Paul Champ.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And so Mr. Champ reached out to you randomly? How did Mr. Champ get in touch with you?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
It was as a result of the meeting I had organized with the Ottawa Police. One of my fellow residents and neighbour was a lawyer who was aware of the action being taken.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And so I just want to take you back as well to that speech you gave with the Leaders' Summit for Action for Chinese Canadians Together. Just let me know if this is correct what you said. This is how you described the protest. "It was insane. It was the strangest Twilight Zone purge scenario where people weren't quite purging, but the opportunity was there because there was just no laws being enforced. So it was this crazy, crazy thing, with hot tubs, with right-wing extremists and then right-wing moderates as well. And then you just -- your confused average grandmother saying, "Oh, isn't this really a great time. I wonder what the air raid sirens are for."" Those are your statements; is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, that is correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And when you say purge scenario, for the folks at home as well as anybody here, I take it you're referring to the film series The Purge; right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, just in reference to the lack of laws that were in place.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And it was your belief the protest provided a purge opportunity; is that fair?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I would not say that the protest or occupation provided a purge opportunity, but the -- what I witnessed on the streets day-to-day was very reminiscent of that kind of lawless world where open fires were being held, laws were being broken in front of police officers who were not doing anything to combat them, and just a general sense and lack of disregard for public areas and, really, the people that live there.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. But again, you said earlier, and you admitted that you stated it was the strangest Twilight Zone purge scenario where people weren't quite purging, but the opportunity was there; correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. So you believe that the opportunity was there for a purge-type scenario; is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I believe the opportunity was there and it was an environment where these people who have been illegally occupying our streets felt that they had the -- I don't know if this is the right word, they had the ability to do anything they wanted as they were not privy to the regulations that the rest of us members of society were. And I came to this conclusion in -- through my witnessing of these crimes being committed, because really, they were crimes, and even speaking with these individuals directly who had informed me that they were not going to face any consequences because they were protected.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. So in the move The Purge, you agree that it’s about that for one day in the United States called the purge, that there are no laws enforced and the population can commit murder, which is the purge. Is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
That is correct, but I was not referencing the entirety of the purge. It was a purge-like scenario where laws were not enforced specifically.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And a purge opportunity was available?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, because laws were not being enforced.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. So people could potentially commit murder? That was your concern?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I did not make that statement.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And you then, I understand, from your evidence that you provided to the Commission prior in your statement, I understand that you started to hear honking on Friday, January 28th; right? Or January 28th, 2022?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And when you provided the statement to the Commission, did you provide it yourself?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
They interviewed you?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Thank you. And I understand that you obtained the injunction on February 5th, 2022?
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
I think it’s February 4th.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
February 4th, 2022, you obtained the injunction to stop the honking? Is that right?
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Pardon me, the 7th. February 7th.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Well there was ---
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
The injunction was obtained on -- approved by the Court on the 7th.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Well I understand there was an interim injunction approved the first two days, and then on the 7th it was approved? Is that the correct facts? Or would -- -
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
No, that is not correct. Two days prior to the injunction being put in place, there was a deferral of the trial to that date where the injunction was eventually approved.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Trial. You said trial. I just want to clarify for the record. There was no trial. It was an application; correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Application. Sorry, I’m not well versed in law. I’m not a law student.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
I understand. And then after you obtained the injunction, I understand that things got a little bit better; right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
For a brief period shortly after the injunction, there was a clear silence from the noise that was previously constant. Shortly thereafter, there was a gradual ramp up in the honking again, but, however, it was more strategic and intermittent than it was previously, whereas it was constant.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And so you said you gave your statement to the Commission before you testified here today; right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And when you gave your statement, you knew you had to be truthful?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And when you gave that statement, of course you wanted to include all important observations and interactions that you had with the protestors? Is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I just want to clarify the statement in reference, is that ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
She gave an anticipated statement, so it’s a statement of anticipated evidence, not a witness statement. So it’s not attributable to her, it’s attributable to the Commission, and that is different from a witness statement, which is attributable to the witness.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So I just want to clarify that.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Sure. And so when you provided the Commission your statement, I take it that you would have told them all the important information that you wanted them to know?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
As far as I was aware, yes. To the best of my ability.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And ---
John Mather, Counsel (POEC)
I’m sorry, Mr. Commissioner. I do want to interject here. Our rules provide that there can be no examination on a statement of anticipated evidence without leave, and I think leave needs to be sought if there’s going to be questions about that.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. I won’t put the statement to her. I’ll move on. I understand that you noticed the honking generally stop after the injunction was granted, though some trucks still honked intermittently for short periods of time? Is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And so that’s what happened after the injunction? Is that correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
To the best of my recollection, correct. That was the immediate aftermath.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. Now between January 28th and February 5th, 2022, did you attend your employment at the Government of Canada?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I was working from home, though I struggled to maintain productivity due to the disturbances that were taking place.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And at the Government of Canada, I take it that you are on salary? Is that fair?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
That is correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
So between January 28th, 2022 and February 5th, 2022, you did not lose any income? Is that fair?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
That would be correct. There was a leave code that was applied for government employees that were affected by the situation.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. But prior to the situation as well, you were working from home, wasn’t that also under the general covid policy for Government of Canada employees?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Could you clarify to the question, please?
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
So prior -- weren’t you working from home prior to January 28th, 2022 anyway?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And how long were you working from home for?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I had started a new position on January 10th with Shared Services Canada. Prior to that, I was employed working from home with another agency.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And what agency were you employed with before?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I was employed with the Canada Revenue Agency.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Canada Revenue Agency. And so from January 28th, 2022, and before, you were already working at home?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Thank you. And moving on from sort of your background with working from home, I understand that you had the interactions with the protestors and you confronted them on Kent Street. Is that correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And when you confronted those protestors, do you remember saying to them, which was recorded, “Go back to where the fuck you are from?”
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I may have said that.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Yeah. And I take it that you never saw any of the -- or never said to the Commission, or saw any protestors or truckers physically harm anyone? Is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
There was only the, I would describe it as intimidation with a truck.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And you never said to the Commission, and nothing in that regard, with respect to seeing protestors or truckers threatening to physically harm anyone either; did you?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I did not make that statement.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And you didn’t say to the Commission or see anything in your observations that could be classified as espionage or sabotage?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I’m sorry?
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
You didn’t see anything that could be classified as espionage or sabotage?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
No.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Thank you. And you didn’t say to the Commissioner you observed any of the protestors or truckers destroy or light a fire to any buildings or anything like that?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Not inside of any buildings, no. Just outside.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Outside. So you’re saying that they were destroying the outside of buildings? Is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I did not say that. I said they were lighting fires outside of buildings, as in the bonfires that were all over the city.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. But they weren’t trying to knock down any form of buildings, or property, or anything like that?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I can’t comment to their intentions.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Well I understand their intentions, but I submit you didn’t see them do anything like that?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
No, I just saw the fires. Open fires.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And you didn’t see them try to destroy any other trucks or vehicles or light them on fire or anything?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I did not.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Thank you. And so I just want to talk to you a little bit about that class action as well. So you became the lead plaintiff on February 4th when it was filed; correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And as of today, I understand there were only three other additional plaintiffs to that action? Is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And the first one is Happy Goat Coffee Company? Is that correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And Happy Goat Coffee Company is a chain of coffee shops that has three coffee shops in the downtown area? Is that fair?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
As far as I know, correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Thank you. And the second plaintiff is, they got added, it’s a numbered company, but it operates as Union Local 631. And I understand that’s a restaurant and bar on Somerset Street? Is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And the third plaintiff is a fellow by the name of Geoffrey Devaney? Is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And he was a bartender and server at a restaurant in ByWard Market?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
My understanding is that he was employed in the ByWard Market.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And that he doesn’t live in downtown Ottawa?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And so after you got the injunction on February 5th, I understand that both yourself and Mr. Champ began to offer the protestors and truckers an agreement that they could sign to be released from your class action if they agreed to leave. Do you remember that?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I would like to clarify that the injunction was granted on the 7th.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. But after the -- on the -- beginning the 5th as well, as I understand, you began to offer this release to the protestors and truckers? Is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And so who was it that you had going out handing out copies of this release to the truckers? Do you remember?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I am not aware of that information.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Did you know that Councillor McKenney was handing them out for you?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Now I do.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And now you do from me telling you, or did you know before this?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Well it was a lot of events and I think it was mentioned that McKenney was out doing this. However, I was not directly involved, other than agreeing to offer this agreement.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And I understand also that you know the NDP Member of Provincial Parliament for Ottawa, Senator Joel Harden. Do you know him?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And he was contacting people and organizing events to raise money for your lawsuit? Do you remember that?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And was it not the Ottawa City Councillor Catherine McKenney and NDP Member of Provincial Parliament for Ottawa, Joel Harden, who supported you and put you forward for that claim? Is that not correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
That is not correct. I’m -- I’ve stated that that was not true previously as well.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And so I just want to bring you to sort of another statement that you had said when you were at the Leaders Summit for Action for Chinese Canadians.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I would also like to clarify that the Leaders Summit has not occurred.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. But you gave a video?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. So can you agree with me that you stated the following: “It came about that the lawyers needed a lead plaintiff to stand up and speak about what was going on and really try to make a difference, because we weren’t seeing any change in our community, which was not acceptable for anybody, but being a Chinese Canadian, it is a bit of an odd role to play, because it's not something that is really necessarily supported or common within our culture, but I really saw the need for somebody, anybody to stand up and speak for the people and help us out of the situation we were in, and the stars really aligned and here I am." (As read)
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, that's true.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Thank you. Those are my questions for you, Ms. Li, and then I just have a few for Ms. La Ronde.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Before you continue, would it be all right to clarify my relationship with Joel Harden and Catherine McKenney? No? Okay.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
If His Honour would like, that's fine.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
There'll be a brief opportunity to re-examine ---
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Yeah.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
--- at the end so.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
So Ms. La Ronde, good morning.
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Good morning.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
So, Ms. Ronde, I understand just from your background, and I'm not trying to poke or anything like that, but I understand you were born around 1947 in Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan; is that correct?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
I was born in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, but grew up in Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan, and you ask women their ages so ---
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
I won't -- I'm not going to. I promise not to do that.
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
They can do the math.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Yes, all right. And I don't want to get into too much with your disability and I'm very sorry ---
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
No, no.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
--- for the struggles that you've had particularly during the convoy and protest but I understand that about in 1961 is when you began to lose your sight; is that fair?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And despite that, you thrived. You obtained a bachelor degree in psychology from the University of Saskatchewan in 1974?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
That's right, yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And you completed your law degree at the University of Saskatchewan in 1984?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
1983.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
'83.
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
M'hm.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And thereafter you completed your masters of law at the London School of Economics; is that correct?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And how many jurisdictions are you a member of the bar in or a member of the solicitor's group?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
I was a member of good standing with the Ontario bar and the New York bar of -- but recently, I resigned my membership from the Ontario bar.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay.
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
I'm still active as the non -- a retired member of the New York bar, but I'm still licensed.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And I understand that after becoming a member of the bar you began to work for the Government of Canada; is that correct?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And you spent 10 years with the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada; is that correct?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
It was more, like, 25 years. I'm just -- just let me recorrect that. It was from 1990, September 1990 to April 2011.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And then you were also with the Department of Veteran Affairs Canada; is that right?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And around that -- in the '80s, you also incorporated a company called De La Ronde International Inc.; is that right?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
That's correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And that company is still in operation?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And is that company not a federal government contractor?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
No.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
No. But it does do government contracts and assists with I believe a lot of First Nations work; is that right?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
It could, yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And you worked as a lawyer for the Government of Canada; is that right?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
No, I was working on the policy side of the picture. I was not a just lawyer with the Government of Canada. I was an executive.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And I don't know the answer to this and I'm going to ask that of you, do you mind telling the folks what brought about your participation in this Commission?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
I had a phone call from the Commission, Commission solicitor asking my permission to, first of all, have a conversation about my experience and then asking my permission if my name could be put forward as a potential witness in this.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Thank you very much. Those are all my questions for the both of you, and have a good morning.
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Thank you. You too.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Thank you. So the next I will call on the Government of Canada to briefly cross-examine.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. BRENDAN van NIEJENHUIS
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
I just have three questions, Your Honour, on Ms. Li. You described a lawless environment during the period of the convoy occupation, I believe, in reference to my friend's questions there, yes?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay. Did that change after you obtained the anti-honking injunction on February the 7th?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
No.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Did it change by February the 14th, the lawless environment that you described?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I don't recall exactly, but I would say perhaps some of it had subsided, but it was still present. If anything, it was more underlying and more desperate, in a sense.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
You obtained an extension of the injunction on February the 16th; is that right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And you showed us photographs on February 17th and 18th, though you couldn't recall which of those 2 dates it was; right?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I believe it was the 17th, yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay. And was there still a lawless environment as you perceived it at that time?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Given my experience personally, I felt that was the case.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Thank you. Those are my questions.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Thank you. Next, I will call on the Ottawa Police.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS. JESSICA BARROW
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Good morning to you both. I just have a couple of questions for you, Ms. Li. You spoke earlier this morning about the injunction. Did circumstances change after the injunction in terms of the level of threats that you were receiving from the community?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Following the injunction, I would say the level of threats increased due to the public attention that had been placed on myself and the situation. Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And once that occurred, once you were receiving a higher level of threat, would you agree that you had multiple interactions with the Ottawa Police Service as a result of that?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, that is correct.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
You had made them aware of the threats that you were receiving?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
The majority of the threats were through the internet, and on certain things; however, I was receiving calls and messages to my personal devices. However, the nature of these messages, voicemails and calls did not seem serious enough for me to make a official report. There was only one instance where there was a serious threat received by the RCMP that had been forwarded to the Ottawa Police that was investigated.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And the Ottawa Police actually attended your residence a couple of occasions as well; correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
That is correct.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
I just want to bring up one document if you don't mind. It's OPS-3014460. Can you see at the top of the page that this is a document dated February 9th?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And can you see about halfway down the page there's a subheading Constable Islam and Constable Lemieux?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
It appears as though there's notes under that heading in relation to the activities of those officers?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
If we could go to the next page, bullet number three, it says, "Mo and I spoke with..." (As read) And then, of course, there's obviously a redaction. "...regarding the threats she has received from her involvement with the injunction related to the convoy protest and the warrants." (As read) Obviously, we can see that there's a redaction here, but would you agree that on February 9th you did, in fact, speak with these two officers from Ottawa Police Service?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Okay. Thank you. And if you could look at that second sentence, it indicates, "She feels very supported by the OPS with this." Would you agree at this time that you had received the attention in relation to the threats from Ottawa Police Service that made you feel comfortable that they were managing that situation?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Thank you. Those are my questions.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Thank you.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Thank you. The next I'll call on the Democracy Fund, Citizens for Freedom and JCCF.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. ROB KITTREDGE
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Hi to both of you. I'll just have a couple of quick questions for you today and first I'll tilt them so they're facing the right direction. You discussed decibel levels with Commission Counsel during the protests. Were decibel levels ever measured inside of your apartment, Ms. Li?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, they were.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
They were?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
By who?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Me, myself.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
How did you do that?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Through decibel measuring devices downloaded onto my phone. These devices -- these applications had been proved -- they had been researched to be comparable to actual physical decibel testing devices.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Can you give me the names of those applications that you used?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Off the top of my head, I believe one was called decibel X or something along those lines.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Can I get an undertaking? Is that possible in this context? I hadn't checked.
Our rules do not provide for ---
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Yeah, okay.
--- party request undertakings during examination.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
All right. So you say you used multiple decibel apps?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
There was two, you know, I believe it was called Decibel X; however, it's been some time.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Okay. And do you remember what exactly the decibel reading was?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
The decibel readings, from my memory, ranged from approximately 75 decibels to at times 85 or 90.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Okay. When speaking with Commission Counsel earlier, you began to describe how you had been pleading with the protestors, and said, "There is a certain frustration when the people that are supposed to help you aren't helping you." Do you recall making that statement?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, I do.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Who were the people who were supposed to help you?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Those people were the Ottawa Police and Bylaw Services.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
And what were they supposed to be doing?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
They were, from my understanding as a resident, citizen, and taxpayer, they were supposed to be supporting us and making sure us, as the public and community, feel safe and that the laws are upheld.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
What what laws did you feel weren't being upheld?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
There were issues with noise, idling, parking, et cetera. Illegal fireworks, illegal fires, public urination, public defecation, harassment on the streets, soup kitchens.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
And there just wasn't any enforcement in your mind of those laws prohibiting those behaviours?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
A lot of the time, I had -- I hadn't spoken to officers directly. I had made calls to Bylaw specifically detailing the incidences that were occurring, and on one such occasion I described fireworks in the vicinity of gasoline and other open fires, as well as things like alcohol and drugs. So that to me presented a safety issue, and therefore I reported it. However, as a result of my report nothing came to -- nothing came to it, and I was informed that the officers on the ground were to keep things safe despite the reality of the situation.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
So in essence, the complaints that you made didn't result in enforcement?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
No.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
And you mentioned that you obtained an injunction in the context of your class action lawsuit that prohibited honking, and that for a time after the injunction was granted the honking diminished but it returned after a time.
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Is that correct?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
That is correct.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
And would it be fair to say that it returned after a time because your injunction wasn't being enforced?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I would say that I can't speak to exactly why it occurred, but I am -- I would feel that enforcement would be a contributing factor.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Did you see any enforcement of your injunction?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
No.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
All right, those are my questions. Thank you.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Thank you very much. And the next is the Ottawa Coalition. Any examination there?
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thank you very much, Commissioner.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. PAUL CHAMP
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
I just have a few questions for both of you. Ms. De La Ronde, can you just confirm approximately how long have you been living in Downtown Ottawa?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Thirty years.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And have you experienced or observed other protests or demonstrations in Downtown Ottawa?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
I've observed other protests in Downtown Ottawa, but closer to Parliament Hill. They did not come to where I was living. Never.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thank you. You told us, Ms. De La Ronde, about being concerned about wearing headphones or earplugs, about knocks on your door, about smoke, or maybe not hearing alarms. Why did you have that particular concern?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
I was concerned because there was the smell, and I was informed as well about gas spills on the street, that there was open bonfires, that they were roasting food out a few metres from my building, so there was such a potential for a fire, a huge fire, and an explosion. So I was concerned that if I could actually get those earplugs to work then I wouldn't hear if my smoke alarm went off or if people were pounding on my door to say "evacuate, evacuate".
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And Ms. De La Ronde, you told us a bit about the diesel fumes. Was that diesel fumes that you would just smell outside on the street, or did you smell them in your apartment?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
It was very strong in my apartment. It permeated drapes, blinds, bedding, carpet. It had a -- the whole unit had a dull, gaseous odour about it.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Did you do anything about that after the protests were over?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Yes, yes. I got -- eventually worked toward getting them cleaned, all of them.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Ms. De La Ronde, you told us a bit about the honking and how you experienced that. After the protests were over, what was your experiences with honking sounds?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Anytime I heard a honk of a horn, and particularly of a large vehicle horn, I could feel it sort of ripple through my body, and I would feel that my nerves were still frayed.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
In the immediate days and weeks after the end of the demonstrations, what was your experiences with horns?
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Very much like that. That -- I kept hearing them, like phantom horns, I kept hearing them in my head. I also had phantom smells too.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And by phantom smells or horns, meaning they're not there, but that's what you ---
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
They're not, they're not there.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thank you, Ms. De La Ronde. Ms. Li, I just have a few questions for you. There were some questions put to you about Councillor McKenney and a Member of Provincial Parliament, Mr. Harden. Had you ever had any interactions with them or met them prior to the class action being commenced?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
No, I had not. Perhaps in passing on the street, but nothing -- not -- they didn't know who I was.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And there were some questions put to you about the injunction and what impact it had on the horns. On the day of the injunction argument of Monday, February the 7th, were you observing that hearing?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, I was.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And were you observing or listening to anything else before or after that injunction hearing?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
After, I did observe a Facebook Live video from one of the organisers who had ordered the truckers in general to stop the horns due to the injunction being put in place.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
So what --- you were watching something online? What was it?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes. It was a Facebook Live video I believe from Chris Barber, if I'm not mistaken, though I can't be sure as to which organiser specifically it was, but they had been laughing about our lack of sleep and something about giving us a break from all the noise.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
The -- what did that livestream person, what did they say about the injunction; do you recall?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
They had said that they -- I remember they were saying, like, "stop the horns, stop the noise."
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And did you hear any -- did you notice or observe any connection with that statement on the livestream video and what was going on outside?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes. Shortly after the video the horns had subsided. And for -- it was like -- like just sort of thinking back to it, like it's hard to not be a little dramatic, but it really was like -- it was like this respite that had came, and it was significant the silence that was present for some time.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
You were following or observing some of the social media of some of the protest organisers?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
After the injunction was obtained, you told us about listening to a social media stream on that date. Did you hear or observe any other social media streams by convoy organisers speaking about the injunction after February the 7th?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes. I do recall after the first video, I don't recall exactly when this occurred, but the first video I believe that the organiser had believed that -- it's hard to say because it's -- there was a just words being spilled, but there was something about that we, not necessarily myself or the lawyers involved, or -- it was a general reference I think to, like, the City or the Government or just the opposition, really, that they were going to give into some demands, but after some time had passed, they had realised that no demands were being given, and to, like -- I don't remember the exact words, but there was a call to action to, like, just let 'er rip.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And let what rip?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
The horns.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And after observing that, did you notice any difference in the horns out in the street?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
Yes, I did notice that there were some -- I remember very distinctly there were some confused horns, because really it sounds sort of crazy to attribute these kinds of descriptions to horns. But whereas before they were sure I think, and like resounding, these were confused, almost as if, do I do it, do I not do it, do I do it, do I not do it? There was a little bit more hesitation in the honking.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And Ms. Li, just a couple -- final couple of questions. When we -- when you talked about measuring the decibel levels, where were you measuring that, was that on the street, or was it in your home?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I had measured the -- in reference to the decibel levels I had described, it was inside of my home, though I had taken some on the streets where it was much louder, closer to 100 or more.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And your apartment, don't tell us which floor, but is it above or below a 10th floor?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
It is above a 10th floor.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thank you. You told us a bit about bonfires, seeing bonfires. We're unsure if we’ll get any evidence about this from the Ottawa Police, but just from what your observations were, what were the bonfires like?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
They definitely varied depending on the location that you went. There were quite a few of them, some were small and just for warmth, others were larger for -- I think there was a pig, like a whole pig being roasted, and I think it was under a fire, but I can't be certain about that. But there was that and there were several bonfires down Wellington Street, often times on corners in intersections where there were people huddled around it, often accompanied by signs and flags,
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thank you. And then finally, you responded to a question from Ottawa Police Council about that, you had expressed or were thankful that the police were managing this situation. What situation did you feel that they were managing?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
I felt that they were managing my personal safety correctly.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And what about it on the streets, did you think they were managing it from your observation?
Zexi Li (Ottawa residents)
No, I did not.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thank you, those are all the questions I have.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Thank you. Does Commission counsel have any brief follow up?
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
No re-exam, thank you.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Well, I want to thank both witnesses for their coming forward to the Commission and for their evidence. The Commission appreciates you coming forward. I also want to thank counsel for the parties, it was very disciplined cross-examination, a very good start, and so we thank you both and you’re now relieved of your obligations and someone can come forward and assist Mme. De La Ronde to --
Victoria De La Ronde (Ottawa residents)
Thank you, Commissioner.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay, thank you. While the witnesses leave, this may be a good moment to take the break and we’ll come back after the break. We’ll take 15 minutes, and when we come back we’ll proceed with the second panel.
The Registrar (POEC)
The Commission is in recess for 15 minutes. La Commission est levée pour 15 minutes.
Upon recessing at 11:02 a.m.
Upon resuming at 11:17 a.m.
The Registrar (POEC)
The Commission is reconvened. La Commission reprend.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. I think we’re ready for the next panel. On est prêt pour le prochain panel.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Mr. Commissioner, my name is Jean-Simon Schoenholz, I’m Commission counsel. I’d like to call Kevin McHale and Nathalie Carrier as the next witnesses.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Bonjour.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Good morning.
The Registrar (POEC)
Mr. McHale, will you swear on a religious document, or do you wish to affirm?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Affirm.
The Registrar (POEC)
For the record, please state your full name and spell it out.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Kevin McHale, K-e-v-i-n M-c-h- a-l-e.
MR. KEVIN McHALE, Affirmed
The Registrar (POEC)
Ms. Carrier, will you swear on a religious document or do you wish to affirm?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I wish to affirm.
The Registrar (POEC)
For the record please state you full name and spell it out.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Nathalie Carrier, N-a-t-h- a-l-i-e C-a-r-r-i-e-r.
MS. NATHALIE CARRIER, Affirmed
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I just want to clarify, I will testify in English though. Sorry, sometimes I switch without knowing.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
We can accommodate that.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Oui, merci.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Allez-y. Go ahead.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Merci.
EXAMINATION IN-CHIEF BY MR. JEAN-SIMON SCHOENHOLZ
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Mr. McHale, Ms. Carrier, could you please start by telling me your title at work?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I’m Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director of the Vanier BIA, which is the Business Improvement Area.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Kevin McHale, I’m Executive Director of the Spark Street BIA and Mall Authority.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. I’d like to pull up a map, just to help orient ourselves. If we could zoom in there? Okay. And let’s go close to where Parliament Hill is, if we can zoom in? So Mr. McHale, you see at the top right there of your screen is Parliament Hill; correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And is Spark Street kind of the highlighted line there?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct, that’s the five blocks of the pedestrian promenade.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. And if we could zoom out? Ms. Carrier, where does the Vanier BIA cover?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
It covers three main streets, Beechwood, Montreal Road, and MacArthur from roughly the river to Saint-Laurent, with the exception of Beechwood that ends when Havelock begins.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And those are indicated here on the map?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. And did you have any engagement with businesses outside of those three streets during the relevant period?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Both Kevin and I sat on daily meetings, and we also sit on the board of COBIA which is the Coalition of BIAs, so we do sometimes get communications from others. I have family and friends that own businesses on Bank Street for example, and some of my businesses on Montreal Road or Beechwood, would own other franchises in others.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And you’re generally aware of the parking lot at Coventry Road that was used by some of the protestors?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Generally aware. I would say intimately aware since January.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Can we just identify that on the screen, please?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
That’s right.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And that location that's been pinned aligns with -- sorry, the one on the left, please -- that aligns with the parking lot we’re referring to?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
In essence, both parking lots were being used at one point, so both the Hampton Inn one and the one that belongs to the city. They are joined together, but there are two separate parking lots.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And Ms. Carrier, the -- your BIA, as well as the Coventry Road location, would you describe that as being outside of the downtown core?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
It depends who you ask and what's being done. Sometimes we're considered downtown because we have more urban issues that are, you know, homelessness, or you know, drug related issues, things of that sort. But for the case of an event that happens downtown, we would be considered slightly on the outskirts, yes.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And were you liaising at all with any of the businesses on Coventry Road?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I was, just by nature of being the closest BIA to them, at one point because things were escalating and there was a lot of complaints being made, I did begin to liaise with a few businesses there.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. We’ll talk more about that later. Can you just quickly tell us, what was your previous experience before joining the Vanier BIA?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I was the Production Manager for Ottawa 2017, so I did large scale public events like La Machine, Crashed Ice, Kontinuum Underground, and you know pre to LRT being created, Picnic on the Bridge, those kinds of things. I have 20 years experience in events.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And did you have experience in that role liaising with the City and Ottawa Police?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I would say that be more unofficially and anecdotally, because of the knowledge that I carry with me, there are things that were brought to this table that were flagrant to me based on the knowledge that I have as - - previously, as a large-scale event planner.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And in referring to things that were Flagrant, you're referring to events during the January and February ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct. So things that we saw that would be event-like during the occupation or protests referred to my previous roles.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
And my current roles. We do events at the BIA as well.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. So for both of you, could you just start by telling me what kind of information, if any, did you receive from the City and OPS in anticipation of the arrival of the convoy?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I would say that we received very little information prior to. In fact, it was mostly the BIA in ByWard that started requesting from our councillor. So to be clear, Councillor Fleury has three BIAs within his ward, ByWard, Rideau, and Vanier. And so ByWard and Rideau had started getting increasingly aware of what was happening. We had been speaking with Bank Street and Spark Street as OCOBIA, and they requested from Councillor Fleury to amass stakeholders so that we could better prepare for the weekend ahead. This was the week leading in, obviously, the week of the 27th/28th.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Mr. McHale?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah, I would say it was very minimal. Spark Street experiences a number of activations and protests and marches and such throughout the years because of our proximity to the hill. So communication was quite minimal. I think it was only really -- we started to receive some because some other BIAs and OCOBIA, which is the Ottawa Coalition of BIAs, starting making direct requests, as we were seeing this event starting to unfold, being bigger than what we typically experience in downtown Ottawa.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. I’d like to pull up Coalition document, sorry, COA00000060. If we could just scroll down? So, sorry, scroll back up. So this is a document dated January 27th. And if we scroll down, is this one of the emails that would have been provided to the local BIAs?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And was this kind of representative of the information the BIAs were receiving in anticipation of the arrival of the convoys?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes. The fact that we actually received it was kind of -- I mean, to receive something, again, because I think we were demanding some more input and support as to what we’d -- what we needed to inform our members of. And this is again -- the information provided isn’t really any different than what we would receive for any other activation or any other event in the downtown core space. So it really didn’t meet what we kind of expected from a level of robustness.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And what did you expect?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
We expected to see a bit of a game plan as to what the actions were going to be to deal with the mass of vehicles that were expecting in the downtown core, perhaps similar to what we see during -- when road closures and such are put into place for an event like Canada Day, where vehicles aren’t allowed in the core for the day, and barriers or city vehicles are used to limit access to certain parts of the downtown core. So really what we wanted to see was an action plan of how police and officials were going to manage the situation.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And would you agree with that testimony, Ms. Carrier?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I agree. I think we were looking for the plans that we normally get and receive or are shared with us leading into Canada Day weekend, or Winterlude, or those kinds of things. So in this particular case, we were expecting Canada Day type closures. And in the case of Vanier, that would only pertain to us as it pertains to any overflow traffic that often or sometimes gets directed to Coventry or would end up on Montreal Road or Rideau.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Did you request that type of information? Did you or anyone else in the business association community?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
We requested from the councillor to have a briefing with Services, which we got. And when that briefing happened, we were surprised to see that that was not this posture that OPS and City were taking, meaning the -- you know, the closing down of the streets in the downtown core to accommodate the level of what we were -- I was seeing on social media was heading our way.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
What kind of information was provided during those briefings?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
To me, ---
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Again, ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
--- specifically, so ---
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Sorry, to clarify, ahead of the convoy’s arrival.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Ahead of the convoy, it was a protest that was slightly unusual because of the nature of the trucks; right? Normally when we have protests, it’s -- there’s busses that arrive and drop off people and then an event happens and they get back on busses and leave. In this case, the trucks were the protestors in many ways. So there was some level that it was going to be complex because of the trucks. But for the most part, we were told, you know, by the end of the weekend, everything should be good and everyone will likely be gone.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And would you agree with that, Mr. McHale?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah, I would agree.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And was that similar to the -- were you receiving information that was similar to what you’d received in other large-scale events, Ms. Carrier?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
No.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
No. How did it differ?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
There was a lack of information for something that we deemed and I deemed having done large scale events on that very particular space. You know, La Machine ran from ByWard all the way to the museum and back. There was actually a Saturday night event that was here. We spent two years planning that because of the sheer level of people and the machines themselves were big. This was -- and so there was really no information, in our opinion, or it didn’t seem to be -- it didn’t seem to be taken as seriously as other events.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Now if we can -- if you can take a look at paragraph 4 here on the screen, it says: “All open-source information in our interactions with Freedom Rally organizers indicate this will be a significant and extremely fluid event that could go on for a prolonged period.” (As read) Did anyone during those briefings provide any explanation for what was meant by “significant and extremely fluid event that could go on for a prolonged period”?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I think that there was an unpredictability about this event. There was reference to there being multiple organizers. But I don’t think we were given much more. Not to my knowledge, ---
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Mr. McHale?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
--- or my recollection.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
No, I would -- the feeling I have when I read a line like this, probably pre-convoy protest, would be that this is just kind of an open-ended protect yourself, saying that, you know, if some of the organizers decide to stay, we don’t know exactly. I mean, it’s not uncommon to see this kind of language, I think, in kind of an announcement like this. But again, our typical experience with other protests in the area are that people come, they protest, and they leave in a reasonable manner and where, at the time, when they say they will.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And what was the impression you got from the communications from Ottawa Police Services?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
That’s the feeling I had going into that weekend, yes, with the communication that we had received. Again, it seemed fairly low key from what we were receiving. My personal feeling was it was a little bit similar to the farmer’s protests that we had a number of years ago in the Ottawa core where a group of farmers came through and brought in tractors and other heavy equipment and were here for a day or so and then left. So it was kind of my feeling of it, was, again, having been on Spark Street for nine years and working in the core for 20, that this would be a loud boisterous weekend event and that by Monday morning I’d be trying to figure out how to clean up my street, which wasn’t the case.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
To clarify, was that your own assessment of the incoming convoy?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct. Yes. It’s my own assessment. Again, that’s taking that assessment based upon the information we were provided.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Right. Thank you. Did anyone during these meetings with city and police officials ask why access to the downtown core was not being blocked, Ms. Carrier?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I feel like at some point all the BIAs there, there were five of us, did. I remember my colleague Kalin from ByWard certainly, you know, making mention to why this wasn’t happening or why couldn’t we block streets like we do often for protestor events, why couldn’t we prevent access to our core. There was no real answer to that.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
You don’t remember any specific response to those questions?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I remember Chief Sloly saying publicly, and not specifically to our daily briefings, but publicly saying things to the order of “I can’t stop trucks from driving in the City of Ottawa. I can’t stop vehicles from driving in the City of Ottawa,” which was baffling to me personally as an events person, because we had and we do often for events.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Mr. McHale, do you recall any specific response to that question?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
No, I -- the response would be what Nathalie alluded to, which is that basically they didn't have the rights to stop the vehicles from coming in.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Did they provide information on why that was?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
No, nothing written.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Who from the City of Ottawa was participating at these meetings, Ms. Carrier?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
It evolved. So in the beginning, it was basically the three BIAs we added in, the three BIAs being Rideau, Byward and Vanier. We added in Bank Street and Sparks. And there was bylaw, traffic, so a series of city services, bylaw, traffic, police, OPS, our NRTs, which is our neighbourhood resource team members, which is a police term for police that are dedicated to specific problematic areas, for lack of a better term, like Byward and Vanier and other areas. And, you know, there was -- I recall -- it was evolving. So depending on the day, depending on what was happening and as the situation was evolving, people would come in and out of these meetings daily based on availability or -- I mean, there's certainly city management services. ACOBIA was there, so Michelle, the executive director of ACOBIA.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Did the Mayor of Ottawa or the City Manager of Ottawa ever participate?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I -- yeah, I don't know.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
I can't recall. I don't believe the mayor participated on one of these calls. I believe someone from the staff was on the call a couple times. Really, on the political side, the call was driven by Matt Fleury, councillor for Vanier. And he and his staff hosted the call every day and there'd be mixing in. Councillor McKenney was on the call a couple of times. Who else?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I remember this ---
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Mona Fortier, yes.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Sorry.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I'm so sorry, go ahead.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
No, no. The MP for Vanier, Mona Fortier, was on the call as well, yeah. Joel Harden was on the call as well.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Later in -- when the occupation became the occupation and not a protest, the call of roughly 20 people was 70 people at times daily. So there were MPPs, MPs that would join in on those calls. But for the most part, the senior city person in -- to my recollection was Kim Ayotte, who was Emergency Services, so he was the person sort of speaking on behalf of fire, paramedics and obviously police, when police wasn't on the call.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And did ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Sorry.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
No, finish your thought, please.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I was going to say, oftentimes, the police representatives we had on the call are not people that I would consider senior OPS that I would have seen in other events.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
So did any of the senior OPS officials, former Chief Sloly, Deputies Bell and Ferguson, did they attend?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I have a recollection of Chief Sloly joining the first week, so between the first and second weekends, there -- I don't recall what day exactly, but there was one call that he was on with us.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah, he was on one or two calls at the very beginning, and then as the situation continued, he was no longer on the call.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And the deputies, did they attend?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
No, generally, police representation was Constable Lemay, who was the community officer ---
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Okay.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
--- was the primary police contact on the phone call.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
And there was -- and I apologize. I do not remember her name, but I believe she was the deputy who came once or twice on the call as well.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Ferguson?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Chris Ferguson.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Sorry.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And do you recall -- so you say Chief Sloly attended once at that first week, so after the first weekend. Do you recall, you know, anything specific that he said during his attendance?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
This is difficult because these are people we work with. These are people that we rely on. I remember being scared personally. I was -- because I remember the Chief saying at one point, "You guys are scared. I get it. I'm scared too." And I thought if the Chief of Police is scared, something much bigger is happening here than a protest, and that personally scared me, and I think a lot of us on that call were shaken. There was also a sense that week that things were starting to get shaken up. You know, there was instability. We -- I sensed a sense of defensiveness, you know. Everyone was caught off guard, I think, everyone. I don't think any of us could have dreamed that this event, that we -- in our biggest thinking would equate to Canada Day, sort of, you know, the infractions that happen, the closures that happen, the people that come in, the disturbances it creates, the loud noise, the fireworks. None of us I think could have understood that that would actually get so much bigger.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
So did you each feel that the business community, the BIAs that you represent, that they got the information they needed to prepare for these events?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
No. No.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Ms. Carrier?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
No, no. Despite us asking vehemently daily. There was no ---
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
What specific information were you seeking that you did not receive?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
So there -- things that pertain to businesses that are very specific in events like this, or -- and I'm sorry, I keep calling it an event. That's my knowledge. So things like will they have access to loading zones, how can deliveries happen, can staff get in, you know, where will the bus routes be, what -- and because there was so much fluidity to what was happening, there was no sense that the plan today was going to be the next -- the plan the next day. There was -- you know, there was some fluidity to it, but mostly, those are the things we needed to know. Can staff take OC Transpo and get from Vanier to their job at the Rideau Centre? Will the Rideau Centre be safe? You know, those are the things that pertain to businesses. Like, can we have -- can they have deliveries picked up? And can they still do click and collect? And can Uber Eats and Skip the Dishes get through? And to give context to it, though we're five kilometres away in Vanier from the downtown core, Uber Eats was not servicing. They were not servicing. So unlike what could be said to have happened to businesses during COVID, businesses were completely crippled, and that has to be understood by this Commission, because there were no deliveries. There was no loading zone. There was no Uber Eats. There was no clients in the stores. A lot of the protesters that arrived did support businesses and I'm not going to say that they didn't. They supported some businesses, but there was a lot of chaos. There was a lot of businesses that were deeply affected by protesters. And then there was this sense -- there was a lawlessness, if I can speak specifically to restaurants, which are often the most flexible of all of our businesses; right? They adapt very quickly. They can figure out things very quickly. But restaurants often had catering tables organized by protesters right outside their doors offering free hotdogs, free chocolates, free, you know, to everyone. Meanwhile, the business that was trying to stay open and survive was not getting any business.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. I'd like to pull up document COA-00000063. So the document we'll see here, Mr. McHale, is an exchange between you and Councillor McKenney.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
M'hm.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
If you can scroll to the bottom, please? Yeah. Okay. So I'll just let you refresh your memory and read that exchange. So Councillor McKenney is asking if you need any additional information.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
M'hm.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And your response is -- and if we can go up just a tiny bit? So on January 28, so before the arrival of the convoy you say, "I think we are good." And then continue. Can you just help maybe explain to us what that meant in the context of what you were just communicating to me?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah, I think, again, it comes down to having been on Sparks Street for over nine years now and having a very veteran merchant mix. There wasn't initially going into it necessarily a lot of concern. So I, you know, again, having a bit more -- you know, dealing with protests and activation through the core all the time, again, I was -- as I said earlier, I felt that this was going to be large and boisterous, but not necessarily -- not obviously the three-week event that it was. So we -- and again, Sparks Street, we tend to be a little self-sufficient. So we were very active on social media, making sure we were getting information from OPS and bylaw, as we were directed to through Coms, and which was said the fastest way to get our information oftentimes was Twitter. And so Catherine did reach out to make sure that we had gotten what we had. And so again, yeah, it was very much I think we're good. The members are aware. Again, my members go into an event like this any other protest, not thinking about closing their doors, not really worried about -- concerned about staff. At events, as we always say -- I always say on Sparks Street, people march up to Parliament Hill determined to get their message out, to tell people about what they need -- what they think that needs to be told and say their piece and they leave satisfied and happy that they've accomplished what they set out to do, and then they end up visiting our coffeeshops and our restaurants, et cetera. It was only kind of into Saturday night, Sunday where we realised this was a different -- there was a different energy in the crowd, if I can use that term, and that's when I get a lot of my businesses, who on the Saturday were open or trying to open. Regulations in Ontario were starting to be lifted and they're being ready to be lifted on the Monday, on the 31st, and so our businesses were kind of actually getting ready for the provinces to reopened and to welcome customers back inside their businesses after a very long January, or yeah, January/December. So again, I wasn't overly concerned. There was a very casual nature to the conversation, and that's kind of how I speak and how I flow.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
In hindsight, were you prepared at that time?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
In hindsight, yeah. I mean, as I say, I was -- here, I -- you know, I talked with staff. Along Sparks Street, we have bollards that can be installed. We use them in the spring, summer, fall to control traffic. They're out right now on the street if you're out there today. Wintertime we have to remove them for snow operations. So we had actually taken them out back in November and so the street was open. And again, it was at that point where at the same time we were just sitting there say, "Okay, do you think we should put them in?" You know, we started seeing vehicles coming in, we didn't want them on the street for what we thought was just the weekend. So my event supervisor and I made the decision, you know, we -- you know, we had to dig out the holes, and they're all full of snow and ice, and dig them out and vacuum them out and we put the posts in for the weekend. And I think it was kind of a fortunate decision for us to do that because I feel like the street would have ended up as kind of a secondary holding spot for vehicles and other activities.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Did you consult OPS?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes. We had reached out to Constable Sean Kay, who we had a conversation with a couple of months ago for another activation. The constable's job is to liaise with marches and activations like that. So we had reached out to Sean to say "Do you think we should do that? Is it going to interfere with Operations?" Again, having a knowledge of the street, in the past when there have been activations or incidents, Sparks Street can sometimes become a holding spot for, or just a cut through for police services or other entities, Operations and such. So we just did a reach out saying, "Is this going to interfere in any of your planning or any Operations?" And he said, "No, nothing, so just keep -- just let us know when it's done." So we did that. Later, at the beginning of the week, I want to say about February 3rd or so, we had to -- we reached -- or 2nd, 2nd or 3rd, we reached back out to let him we were taking them out. They had done their job, they kept the vehicles off the street. The feeling was there was two things happening then. I felt that the vehicles couldn't move anymore, they were kind of jammed into the spaces, and we had snow falling, and so we had to pull them out so that snow clearing could happen. What ended up happening was there was no snow operations for the next three weeks, so you had a nice layer of snow and ice on Sparks Street that -- for the remaining of the convoy.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
So did you keep the bollards in for the whole period?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
We ended up removing them. And what we realised from observing the crowd, the vehicles and everyone around us, and the way the groups were operating is we felt Sparks Street was okay without them in at that point because we didn't think anything large could get in anymore. There was a lane for fire and such, but that was about it, and that was being respected by everyone. So -- and it would have been -- again, these were mechanical, all -- they're not all automated, it's not a heat system, it's a pretty simple system, but by that time to get -- to put them back in was going to be very difficult after a snow event.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Had you ever put these up for another protest before?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
We had not.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Ms. Carrier, I understand again, as you previously said, that you had some -- you liaised to a certain extent with the businesses on Coventry Road and visited that location.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
M'hm.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Is that correct?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And why was Coventry kind of a significant location in these events?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Because the businesses were right next door to the encampment. So to put it in context, there is a hotel, a parking lot for the hotel, a parking lot for the stadium, the stadium, and then there is a Canadian Tire, Best Buy, and a Starbucks that are right there. There is also, just at the corner of Lola, there is a veterinarian and emergency hospital for animals, and also, one of our organisations that we liaise with a lot, the Minwaashin Lodge, was there as well. So there is organisations that are racialized that are in and around that area, so in my expertise as being a business relations person, I started just checking in on them to see if they were okay.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
How frequently did you go visit that location physically?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Usually once a weekend. The weekends were definitely the worst. But Canadian Tire, we - - I must've spoken to them five or six times, different people at each time. Sometimes it was the person, the customer service person; sometimes it a manager on duty or another. The Starbucks, I would be going in to get a coffee, because I spent a lot of time at Coventry, and anecdotally I would ask questions and spoke to the manager once, I think.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So what did the manager or other personnel from Canadian Tire report to you throughout this period? And maybe try and identify which time.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Right. So in the beginning, it was, you know, they were selling a lot of stuff. They were selling gas tanks, and they were selling rope, and you know, all the type of things that I think you would buy if you were camping out. And they also reported that large groups of protestors, you know, by large I probably mean 3 to 10, would come in at once and then do the sort of thing that was, you know, that is now sort of cliché, but would go up to the workers with masks on and say, "Why are you wearing a mask? Why are you doing this?" They would disrupt the sort of general, you know, the store, they would disrupt the store. And there was also evidence or not evidence, sorry, there was things that were relayed to me that they -- the protestors had been putting up posters throughout the store that looked like public health posters, but saying things like, "masks are stupid, or masks aren't needed", or you know, so counterintuitive sort of things that staff... Nothing, you know, violent, but definitely disruptive. The most terrifying call I had was on the last -- the third weekend, where the manager was talking to me, and he said, "You know, Nathalie, I don't know if this is something but I feel like I should tell you. We've sold out of knives and bear spray this weekend." And that is something that I reported immediately to OPS.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Did you - - were -- did the Starbucks location, and their manager, report anything to you?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Just disruptions. You know, there's a lot of LGBT people that work in OPS and, sorry, in Starbucks, and OPS as well, I'm sure, and that -- sorry. But you know, there was a general feeling of annoyance, you know, it was an annoying thing. It was, you know, it was fine, but it wasn't, you know, the pleasant sort of... You know, there was some -- some protestors were perfectly pleasant and lovely, you know, that should be said. They're not all homogenous; right? But there were definitely the ones that would make comments about why they'd be wearing a mask in a window, and the door would be -- you know, "the window's open, you don't need a mask", those types of things. And again, I think we have to put this back into context of the first weekend being our stores were still closed. You couldn't go into a restaurant that first weekend; that was reopening on the 31st. So the -- you know, the feeling that we have about masks today, really has to be brought back to how weird that felt then.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
I understand that you also visited the Coventry Road parking lot where the -- that the protestors were using during this period; correct?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Several times, yes.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And you took some videos?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I sure did.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
I'll show a few to you. So if we can pull up COM, five zeroes, 744. If you could tell me when this was taken and where? [VIDEO PLAYBACK]
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I believe -- I'm going to say it's Sunday night of the first weekend. Sorry, this is very embarrassing. It has to be said. [END VIDEO PLAYBACK]
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
So this was the first weekend you were telling me?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct, on the Sunday night. And again, it has to be put in context. The reason I took this video was to share with my colleague at OPS because that day we had been told that, you know, now we're going to move towards egress, but I was trying to demonstrate there is no sign of egress at Coventry.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And when you say, sorry, you said your colleague at OPS. You mean a kind of a police liaison in that area?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
The person that was on our calls with us during -- at those daily meetings, yes.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. And can you describe ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
--- what was on that video? Anything significant stand out to you?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Well, two things. So this video, to put it in context, is next to the stadium, so on, you know, depending on what map you're looking at, not on the hotel side but on the other side. What I had observed during that weekend, and it increased during the week, and certainly on the second weekend, was the sense of directing their own traffic, of allowing certain trucks in, or, you know, people in or not. So there was a sense of security that was -- security system of some sort that was building up. I observed large scale tents that, again, from an event planner perspective, signified to me, you know, organization, and places to work, and places to make food. I saw food being brought in. I saw deliveries being made. This is over the course of the four weeks. And I sawt hat encampment grow from an overflow parking to an encampment, a very solid, very organized, Blues Fest large scale event style, “We’re here for a long time and we have the infrastructure to stay.”
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Let’s just play COM00000743, please? [VIDEO PLAYBACK]
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
That’s the same night. The other side of the parking lot. [VIDEO PLAYBACK] Again, terribly embarrassing. Sorry.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
So your understanding ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Everybody hates their own voice; right? Sorry. I just had to say that out loud. I’m nervous.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
So based on your observations that day, it sounds in the video, did you conclude that people were there to stay longer term?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I am somebody that is very savvy with social media. To me personally, it was clear that the 70-kilometre train of trucks that crossed the country was not coming in for a small protest in a day. And to me, that Sunday night was the proof that, you know, somebody somewhere had underestimated or not listened to the anger, frustration, that a large, at that point, you know, large number of people felt. They were coming to the City of Ottawa as the representatives of what they thought and they were going to stay there. They were going to stay there until they were heard.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
I want to just show one last video. COM0000749. [VIDEO PLAYBACK] So when was this video taken?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I believe that’s the second weekend.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Okay.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
And what you see in that video are things that, again, as an event planner, I took because it drove me crazy, because there was a propane tank next to diesel with, like, wooden pallets packed right next to it, which no -- I mean, an event would be, A, not even allowed to operate, second, would be shut down and police trucks would be there, bylaw would be there, and as an event planner, I would be fined. And there was no fining. I saw tents that normally, again, as an event planner, both in my BIA role, but also previously, you need permits to put up tents like that in the City of Ottawa. You pay a permit, an inspector has to come, there has to be an engineer evaluation. To my knowledge, none of that had been done at Coventry. So I essentially had a festival happening in my community that was neither sanctioned, or was it protected by the normal standards that the City of Ottawa would adhere to. And in the city, there’s a thing called the SEAT Program, which is Special Events Activation Team, and any event that goes through the City of Ottawa must go through the very, very stringent process of being evaluated by that, and none of it had been done. I witnessed downtown stages on, you know, the back of a truck, you know, wooden things made, wooden things with diesel being poured on to them. Like, just things that were, in my 30-years experience, absolutely baffling, and quite frankly, you know, dangerous.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
There’s a few other videos ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Sorry.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
--- I won’t take you to because of time, but Ms. Li this morning testified that she saw urine in some of the streets.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yeah.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Did you ever witness anyone ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I ---
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
--- dumping urine somewhere?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yeah, I have a video that I submitted when I was driving to see one of my staff, and I was coming back towards -- on Nicholas between DND and University of Ottawa, and I was taking the video to demonstrate that there was lawlessness. Like, there were trucks parked on sides of roads and in the middle. This is an onramp to a major highway. And as I was driving past, I saw somebody, out of their thing, dump a chemical toilet. And I caught it by accident on to ---
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
From what you -- sorry, from what you ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Right outside DND.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. From what you observed, were the participants in the convoy respecting the rules of the road at all times?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I think some were, and I think a lot weren’t.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
And what did you observe that led you to that conclusion?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
There’s another video that I submitted where, at Coventry, there -- I don’t know this for a fact, but I deduced that there was sort of a shift change that would happen. There would be a series of trucks that would leave in the morning, and some would come back. And they would sort of do this convoy style, obviously. They’re a convoy. So but on several occasions, I would be trying to sort of leave that parking lot, and there would be 50, 60, 100 trucks all in a row not respecting traffic, not respecting traffic lights, and sort of operating as a parade. But again, in the City of Ottawa, when you do a parade, you have to have a police escort, there are certain laws, it’s announced ahead of time what you’re -- you know, your trajet, sorry, I don’t know what that word in English is.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Route.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Route. Merci. And, you know, so again, these were things that would happen. I saw convoys of trucks -- sorry, like farm tractors driving down Vanier Parkway, which is not even a trucking route. You’re not even allowed a truck on Vanier Parkway normally. Like, none of our businesses could get a truck to drive down Vanier Parkway to come give them a delivery, and yet, you know, we’re seeing these types of things. So I saw a lot of that.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Mr. McHale, can you describe, generally, the impact on the businesses in your BIA?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah, generally for Spark Street businesses, the -- for the most part, especially after that Saturday, the first Saturday, I would say about 85 percent of them just stayed closed for the remainder of the protest and for the week afterwards. It was difficult for them. I mean, businesses that were open would suddenly end up with five, 10, 15 people in the store unmasked wanting to use the bathroom, or just to warm up, not actually getting any services, especially if it was a retail business. Food businesses initially in that first weekend, you know, reported me to -- staff would report to me that they had difficulty managing the customers coming in. Businesses were, of course, were under the regulations for the closure and such, so if they were allowing customers in, those customers had to be masked, there was limits on what they could do. It was impossible for them to enforce it. And that was something I think we did bring up on one of the calls eventually, which was -- and then, again, initially we were told, “No, it’s up to the business to enforce that. The business has to make the decision whether they’re going to stay open or closed. It’s up on the business.” And then it was brought to their attention it’s quite impossible for a single shop owner to police five or six people who are in -- determined not to follow the local health ordinances. So we did get some clarity on that, that eventually the -- it would be in the best judgement of the bylaw officer whether or not they would impose a fine on the business or a warning.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Are you aware of any businesses that received fines for ---
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
No. None of my members reported anything.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
It was said though -- sorry, I have to say, it was said that if fines were given out, they would be given out to the business, ---
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
M’hm.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
--- not to the people. So that’s, again, another deterrent to keeping your business open, because if you can’t control or have security there at your own expense, which ---
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
--- most of these stores didn’t have at that point. Again, we’re coming off of a two- year, you know, covid, and then we all got caught off guard right before Christmas that we were shut down again. So a lot of these businesses had no money for security or anything. So they thought, “Well, if I can’t police it, I’m going to get a fine. It’s not worth it.” So they would close.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Mr. McHale, do businesses on Spark Street typically close during protests?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
No. When this started getting bigger than it was, I was talking to my Chair specifically about this, he’s been downtown as a business operator for over 50 years and has never closed his business. That would include during the G20 Summit when it was here a number of years ago, and other activations. It’s never occurred to them to close during any event before. This was the first time where he felt concern for his safety and any staff he were to bring in during that time, which led to him closing his business.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. What other impacts, Mr. McHale, on Ottawa businesses generally are you aware of as a result of the convoy?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah, a business of mine who was publicly against the convoy as it was interfering with their business had their Google Review attacked. So they suddenly randomly started getting one-star reviews on their business, and that’s something that’s very difficult for a business to -- it’s an easy thing for someone to do if they’re ticked off, somebody to give someone a one-star review, but in this day and age of internet reviews and such, those things are so important to a business, and suddenly a business that had a four and a half star rating was suddenly trending at, I believe at like two, two and a half, which is -- there’s no -- it’s difficult to recover from anything like that and it’s very difficult to go to the providers, the Yelps and that and say, these are all fraudulent reviews. This is a bike shop owner and so his business at that time of the year is very quiet anyways, but he does have some customers coming in doing maintenance during the wintertime and such and the intention was to be open for his mechanics to do work through the winter, and during this period it was just impossible.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Those are all -- oh, go ahead.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I was just going to say it should also be noted that the Rideau Centre in its history and in the history of Cadillac Fairview had never closed for a day, and even when the stores are closed the Rideau Centre is the walkthrough for transit, so it’s always open 24/7, you can go to the washroom there, you can go warm up in there. It closed and that cost them $2 million a day and they were closed for three - - three weekends, the worst of which would be Valentines Day and Canada -- and Family Day. And I think for businesses, we have to state how important that is. I have a business, Quelque Chose Patisserie, they have their bakery and -- sorry, I’m going quickly -- their bakery in Vanier they also have two other franchises, now three, but because -- and they had trouble at the Byward one so they closed down, but that affected the bakery and it affected also Westboro, because their Westboro location people were told to stay home, so they didn’t have it. So again, that is -- that losing -- for that bakery to lose Valentines Day and Family Day weekend carries them through the first quarter. Those two days it was said to me yesterday by that business owner, that carries them through January, February, and March. And again, that’s a normal January, February, March, not one where you were shut down at Christmas, not one where you’ve been shut down for two years. So it was devastating.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you very much. Those are all my questions, we’re out of time. But I do want to allow you if there's anything that I haven't covered that you think we need to share with the Commission briefly.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Go.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
No, you can go. I’ve been going first, so you go.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
I just think it’s difficult to explain because -- it’s been very difficult sometimes for us to explain how devastating it's been for our business community and the downtown core. You know, I prime example I think was an example that was about halfway through the event I'm in line that night, after spending 12 hours on the street, in the line at a coffee shop in Kanata, just to pick up some coffee for the next morning for my family, and I'm looking inside this coffee shop and I’m seeing customers inside. And immediately my brain said, “Oh my God, they’re in violation of the health orders”, da, da, da, and then I realized, no, the rest of the province has been allowed to open, it's just downtown Ottawa. And I think that's the effect that this had, was because this activation happened for as long as it did, police directed the residents and visitors to not come downtown. It's something we still deal with today with the Wellington closure and such, and the reputation of the city and the downtown. We've already seen in tourism numbers this summer, they are down. We’re continuing to see that the reputation of the city has been -- as a place to visit, has been greatly tarnished and it's going to take us years to truly recover from that in the downtown core, if we ever do.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I have two things I would add. One, just to say to that, I have friends who, you know, decided that they would have this beautiful Ottawa staycation David summer, and they go, and they bike, you know, and they go to the market, and then there sitting out in the market at the end of this really amazing day, and then all of a sudden this protest comes up and people start yelling and screaming, and so this was months afterwards. So to Kevin's point, it's still happening now, there's still disruption to businesses. The second point I'd like to make in closing is that, and I don't know this has been tackled, but Vanier is the most diverse BIA of all the BIAs in Ottawa and we have the highest level of racialized people within -- or racialized business owners. So MacArthur specifically is the street which is the closest street to the convoy, a street that is very multicultural and has a lot of, you know, a lot of specific cultural groceterias, restaurants, those types of things. Anecdotally, there was a lot of -- it was very difficult for some of those business owners, and though they may or may not have closed, the sense -- and I think, you know, the speakers this morning sort of talked to that, there was a sense of like, foreboding in the city. There was this intense feeling, and specifically, one of our organizations that we worked quickly with was targeted, or not targeted, was intimidated to a certain extent by having men standing outside their windows looking in, again, comments being made, and this is a shelter for Indigenous women and children. So you know, it has to be said that the damage done, I think was somewhat disproportionate to those in our city that are equity seeking and equity deserving, especially our small businesses.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you very much. Those are all my questions.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Thank you. Again, I’d ask, has there been any agreement on the order of cross- examination? Seeing no indication, I will call on again on -- in terms of the length of time that’s been allocated, starting with the convoy organizers.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Good morning.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Good morning.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. BRENDAN MILLER
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
My name is Brendan Miller, I’m counsel for Freedom Corp. I've been asked to make sure that we introduce ourselves before we start. I just have a few questions for you, and just seeing how, most of these are what you call Brown and Dunn questions. I just need to give them to you so that there’s some other evidence down the road. I need to be fair to you, so I need to put a lot of this to you, okay?
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Just to be clear, Brown and Dunn is simply, they put a statement to you that it may be contradicted later. So you should have a chance to comment.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Thank you.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Thank you for that clarification.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
So yes, sorry, I’m too lawyer.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I Was trying to fake it till I made it on that one.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
That’s good, it’s good. You did a very good job, you sold me. So -- okay. So I understand that after protests there was two funds set up, one being $20 million was set aside by the federal government to compensate Ottawa businesses affected by the protest, and another one for 10 million from the provincial government. Is that correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And to date, or at least as of June, I understand that of the federal government funds, only 8.6 million have been used. Is that fair?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I don't have that knowledge. I know a lot of my businesses took advantage of it.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
I can't comment on the total, but I could state that the majority of my Main Street businesses -- my storefront businesses did apply to the fund.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And of the $10 million provided by the province, I can't find if much of that was used. Can you tell us, do you know any amounts with respect to the amount of money that was used from the provincial funds?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
No.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Thank you. You had said in your evidence, Ma’am, that Uber Eats wasn't available during the protests. I'm going to put it to you that it was.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Okay. I ---
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Can you -- I’m giving you an opportunity --
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I’m not sure ---
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
That’s the purpose of this, so ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Right.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
--- I want to be fair to you. I'm going to put it to you that Uber Eats in fact was operating during the protest, and was in fact even delivering food to the protesters.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Then I would say there are likely times Uber eats was operating and other times on the weekends which I think our businesses would deem to be the most busy times, where a lot of them weren’t. There was a lack of drivers. I know that was a major issue, and then because of the closures, you know, there is zero access for it. So whether the app was open or not, I'm not aware, but I can tell you that many of our restaurants in Vanier and others could not use that service ---
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
--- as a method to sell their food.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
And for -- sorry -- further to that, some would make the orders and they wouldn't be picked up, so there was an additional loss.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And did you yourself experience any inability to use Uber Eats?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I did not use Uber Eats in that time, no.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. Did either of you have contact with the Member of Parliament, Mona Fortier during this time? I believe she was the President of the Treasury.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes, she is the MP that represents Vanier, so I do, yeah.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And I take it that when you contacted her, at one juncture you asked her to help you with respect to removing police blockades that were affecting the market in your area. Is that fair?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I did not, no. That was not my request. That may have been my colleague in the market, but it was not me.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And in the videos my friends from the Commission played for you, those videos taken by you, you would agree that there was no honking or noise in the background in those videos, was there?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
In some there were, not in those particular videos, but at times there was honking. There wasn’t as much honking at Coventry, no.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Yeah. And what time -- I saw all the videos it was ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Roughly 6:00 p.m.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Roughly 6:00 p.m. So ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Well, the first weekend that was roughly 6:00 p.m., on the second weekend it was 9:00 a.m. in the morning.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
So it depends. I was there different times.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. But you agree in both those videos there’s no loud noises, there’s no honking while you’re driving and taking those videos?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
There was honking, yes. There was definitely honking. There was some loud noises. Whether they were a loud as downtown, no they were not.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
But there was definitely honking and depending at times too. Also, yeah. No, there was not.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And were you aware that on January 25th, 2022, the City of Ottawa received an email from the Hotel Association here in town stating that the truckers and protesters had booked stays for over 30 days?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I was not aware of the email, but I do know that Steve Ball from the Hotel Association was on many of our calls, especially in the third and fourth weekend, near the tail end of them, and he did make that aware to us. He also pointed out to the fact that there was a lot of hotels that couldn't be accounted for because they would be booked through third party.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
So the hotels.coms or things like that.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
So can -- is it fair to say that, to your knowledge, that the Municipality of -- or the City of Ottawa knew on January 25th, 2022, that these protesters and truckers were intending to stay a lot longer than the weekend?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
It appears to me that they should have known that, yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And you had mentioned that you saw some folks pouring out urine and other fecal matter or what have you.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
It was urine.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Yes, okay. And what date was that; do you recall?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
The date is on the video. I believe it was the second weekend, possibly the third weekend. I'm sorry, it's on the video, but ---
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
But it wasn't at the beginning?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
It wasn't on at the beginning, no.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Were you aware that the protesters -- I know truckers had applied for and had been given permits for porta potties originally, but those permits were then pulled?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I am not aware of that, no. But I'm happy to hear that at some point something was permitted, yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Well, that was the beginning -- at the beginning. And I just -- I'm trying to prepare you.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Thank you.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And you had mentioned that you had seen or heard from some store owner that they had sold out of knives and bear spray; is that right?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
The Canadian Tire, yes. That's what ---
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
--- it was told to me.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Is it fair to say though that you never saw any protesters or truckers running around waving knives?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Most of the people I know that hunt with knives don't wave them around.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. Good. I ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
So they would be concealed perhaps, but I don't -- I guess what I'm trying to say is I don't think waving around a knife states whether or not the knife exists.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Did I see the knives being waved around? No, I did not.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And you never -- -
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Do I trust that the Canadian Tire was telling me the truth? Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. So and you never saw protesters with bear spray?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I was not in the heat of it on the last weekend, if that's what you're implying, no.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And despite that Canadian Tire had sold out of these items, you had no knowledge of who they sold all of these items to; is that fair?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I had none, no.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
So you don't know if you sold them to protesters or if they sold them to local residents; would that be fair?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I suppose that would be fair, yes. I mean, I suppose we could probably cross-reference credit cards at some point and figure that out, but I don't think that that is the case.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Credit cards. Well ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Well, I don't know.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
I think the feds will need to get another order for production for all that.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Likely. Way above my pay grade, sir.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Way above mine too.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Thank you.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
So I believe those are all my questions for you. Thank you very much.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Thank you.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Thank you. Next I'd like to call on the Ottawa Police Service.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS. JESSICA BARROW
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Good afternoon to you both. My name is Jessica Barrow and I represent the Ottawa Police Service. I want to start -- we had a bit of a discussion earlier, we heard a bit of a discussion earlier about what information BIAs would typically receive as we're preparing -- or as the City was preparing for a protest, or an activation as you called it, Mr. McHale. And so I want to unpackage that a little bit and I'll start with you, Mr. McHale, if that's all right. So in terms of the types of information you would expect to receive, would that typically include the nature and location of any traffic disruptions?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
As well as any plans the police may have to mitigate any such traffic disruptions?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
You would also presumably expect to hear about any information the police have available to them about the expected behaviour of the protesters?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Within reason, yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
As well as the expected number of the protesters?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And perhaps how disruptive the protest is likely to be to your local businesses?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes, on occasion we've been told about how the levels of cooperation between the organizers and City officials, so, yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Right. And you would expect to be advised where businesses could direct any concerns they may have, should those arise throughout the course of events; correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
I take it though that you would agree with me that there may be circumstances under which there are impediments to police disclosing certain information to local businesses; is that fair?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
It's fair.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Or that may impede the police's ability to consult with the public or community members or business members and jointly agree on strategies?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
I agree with that.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
For example, there may be sensitivity or confidentiality around certain operational planning techniques that may be going on at OPS?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
I'd agree with that.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
As well as in relation to any intelligence information in the possession of the Ottawa Police?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And I take it you would obviously agree with me that you could not expect the police to provide information to the public which is not yet known to them?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
I would agree with that.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you would agree that the police may need to quickly or unilaterally adopt or change strategies to address the changing circumstances of an event?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
We spoke earlier, we heard earlier about the experience that local BIAs and in particular the downtown core have with events and demonstrations and protests in the City of Ottawa; correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you've indicated that they're a fairly regular occurrence?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Would you agree with me that the convoy was unlike any of the previous demonstrations or protests the City has seen?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
I would.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
More specifically, the size of the convoy was unlike any previous protests local businesses have seen?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And the volatility of the convoy was unlike previous protests?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And in fact, you indicated that previously businesses have never been required to close?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
That's correct.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And that this time they did because this protest was very different from all previous ones?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Many chose to close based upon what information or lack of information was provided to them, yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
So I want to talk now -- we talked sort of a generalities, now I want to focus on the specific communications that were provided to BIAs in the leadup as well as during the convoy. I want to start with a document. It's an OPS- 403228. And if we could go specifically to page 6? Just maybe scroll down a little bit. Thank you. That's perfect. Can you see here that there's an email exchange between the Ottawa Police and the City of Ottawa?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Perhaps just scroll back up a little bit, so we can see the date. It's on January 26 at 12:09 p.m.?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
M'hm.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And would you agree with me that it says that, "The community police officers are in touch with downtown BIAs and are providing them with updates to expect large crowds and traffic disruptions. We cannot tell them to stay open or to close, but some businesses may elect to close, so as not to get tied up in an anti-vax demonstration." (As read)
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
I see that, yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Do you recall that as of this time, which is January 26th, OPS community police officers were in fact reaching out to local BIAs to share information in advance of the convoy's arrival?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah, information was being sent to us and other organizations, yeah.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And this is 2 days prior to the beginning of the convoy starting to arrive on the 28th?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Dates are correct, yeah.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And businesses are being told that there will be large crowds as well as traffic disruptions?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And that there is a possibility of anti-vax demonstrations in downtown establishments by convoy participants?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
But that ultimately, the decision has to remain with the businesses as to whether or not to close?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
I want to take you now to OTT-00000166. There's also a .0001 on the end if that's required. And if we could just scroll down a little bit, you'll see an email to the January 25th email below. That's perfect. So you can see here it's an email from Sébastian Lemay on January 25th at 11:38 a.m. And you would agree with me that Sébastien Lemay is one of the Community Police Officers, I believe, that was testified to earlier?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes, he’s not mine.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
No, but he’s -- yes.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you would agree that it tells us a few details about the upcoming convoy, and this is as early as January 25th; correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
“The Ottawa Police are in the process of continually monitoring the progression of the convoy.” (As read) Correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes, sorry.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
That: “They can expect significant traffic disruptions.” (As read)
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
That: “Police resources will be deployed to mitigate safety risks.” (As read)
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And it points you to where you can go to receive regular updates?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah, as we always check regardless.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Right. And then, of course, it promises to disseminate any new information as it’s being received? And would you agree that further information subsequent to this was disseminated in a similar fashion from either this Community Police Officer or others that were local to your area?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes. We’d get other emails similar in nature and broadness.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Great. Ms. Carrier, I want to turn to you, if you wouldn’t mind, for a minute. I’m going to take you to OPB0001257. Thank you. So this is the minutes of the Ottawa Police Services Board’s special meeting that took place at 1:00 p.m. on January 26th. If we could turn to page 2 of that document, we see an agenda item that reads: “Operational Briefing on Weekend Demonstrations” and it’s the Chief’s report. Did you watch this meeting?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I did.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
You did.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
M’hm.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
So we may not need to go through all this since you obviously watched the meeting, but would you agree that the meeting informed community members on the fact that this was a fluid event that could go on for a prolonged period? And we of course saw this same sentence in another communication as well? Is that correct?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I would agree that that’s the information that was made to all public, yeah.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And that the event was unpredictable?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And that existing intelligence was that protestors were peaceful, but that they would update if that were to change?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And if we turn to page 4 of this document, the second last bullet, we can see here that there’s questions being asked by Councillor Fleury, and we see here in response some advise to business owners. Is that fair?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Sorry, the second last bullet? Or the ---
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Sorry, it starts, I guess, the last bullet.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Okay.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
If you keep scrolling. Yeah, okay. So sorry, the second bullet on page 5. There’s a question raised in relation to the BIAs in particular.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes, I do remember that.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Okay. And do you recall that there was also information at this point that the police were anticipating numbers in the one to 2,000 range, but that even within the hour, they expected that that was information that was continuing to change?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes, I remember that, but that’s not a lot of people normally. So again, that doesn’t -- I just want to state, because I think it’s important to state the context. Three thousand (3,000) people on Parliament Hill is not a lot of people. Like, when you look at what the numbers are on Canada Day. So again, it doesn’t point to something that I would look at that and go, “Oh, wow. Three thousand (3,000) people. We’re going to be, you know, in this ---
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Right.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
--- for the long run.” So 3,000 people is not a ton of protestors, no.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
But they were indicating that they were giving you the information they had at the time, and that as that changed, they were going to update the information; correct?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct. And again, this wasn’t to BIAs. This was to the public.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Right. But you were permitted to attend and did in fact attend; correct?
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
I just want to point out you’re out of time.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Okay.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
So if you want to wrap up or get to a point?
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Sure.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
A lot of this, I think, has been a bit repetitious.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Sure. I’m happy to wrap it up. I just want to ask a couple more questions to you, Ms. McHale. Is it true that you were a fairly frequent ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Ms. ---
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Sorry, Mr. McHale, Ms. Carrier. You were in frequent communication with your Community Police Officer throughout that time?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
So that’s actually a very good question, because our NRTs in Vanier were pulled from us and taken downtown. So I was not in communication with my own normal OPS people with who I transige. I don’t know what that word is in English, but that I work with every single day. I was in liaison with the community officer for the ByWard, who was now doing five BIAs.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
So you were speaking with, I believe, Cst. Lemay; correct?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Right. Okay. And you would frequently ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
But that -- just so we’re clear, that’s not the constable I would normally deal with.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Right. But you were in communication with ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Mine were taken away.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
--- someone from Ottawa Police; correct?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Yeah. And he was responsive?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Yes. And you had raised complaints or concerns ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
--- or information you had found on social media, for example?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes. So there was a sense that it -- he didn’t necessarily have the -- I don’t know how to explain it, but he’s not a senior level executive of the Ottawa Police Force.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Would he indicate though, in response to those emails, that he was passing the information along ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
--- to whomever maybe would be that senior individual?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Okay. Those are my questions. Thank you ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Thank you.
Jessica Barrow, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
--- both for your time.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Thank you. Now -- okay. Former Chief Sloly’s counsel, please.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. TOM CURRY
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Can I ask you to start with -- both of you, separately, would you agree that the event that you described, this protest was, in your experience, unprecedented?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
As to its scale?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
As to the demeanour of the protestors?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And equally, as to the police response? There was a larger police response to this protest or occupation than you had seen ever before?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
I would say at the end of the occupation there was a larger police presence than before. I would say that from my vantage point, where my office was and where I’m located, that the police presence throughout didn’t appear to be much larger to me, visually, compared to other events.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Right. Over a longer duration obviously?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
You would agree, Ms. Carrier?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I would agree with what Kevin said, yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
In the beginning, not so much, but near the end, definitely more.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Understood. Now, in respect of the things -- and my colleague in the Police Service just asked you this, but I just want to understand it, and for the Commissioner’s purposes, neither of you is suggesting that you have better insight into the community of security intelligence or police intelligence than have police agencies; correct?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
No. Correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay. And you would -- I want to come to the meetings, if I can, that you had with police. And you’ve had police liaison officers in the community with whom you’ve spoken, both of you; correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
M’hm.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And in that respect, you had the same, or perhaps better access to police than you have had in other protests? Would that be true?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
I would say that the call initiated by Mat Fleury’s, and his office, allowed us to have a daily conversation with a community officer, or occasionally somebody slightly higher in rank. I would say that throughout that, we didn’t receive any additional insight or information more than what was being released in press releases during that time.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Daily -- just stopping there, you had daily contact with police?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Almost daily, as long as they weren’t being pulled into some other action or meeting.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And which if they were, you would understood why?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Clearly.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Ms. Carrier, you agree with that?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I would agree with that.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And Mr. McHale, a couple of things. You had -- you told us, I think, that you had met with Chief Sloly, or he attended these calls, on one or you thought two occasions; correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah, again, we held about 30 some of these calls, so I can’t remember all, but I can -- would absolutely state that he was on at least one call.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Yes.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Sure. Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And you thought perhaps two? Probably two?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Possibly two. And again, I apologize ---
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
--- that -- we had a lot of them.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Ms. Carrier?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I only recall one.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay. And you both gave statements to the -- of your anticipated evidence. You were interviewed by our friends for the Commission; correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And did you read those statements before you came here today?
John Mather, Counsel (POEC)
I’m sorry, Mr. Commissioner. Again, ----
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
I’m coming to that.
John Mather, Counsel (POEC)
Okay.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
I understand the issue. Did you read them before you came here today?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I have not.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
No.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay. At the time you gave the information to the Commission, you did your best to provide information that was accurate and complete; correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
To my knowledge, yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And you knew it was important?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
You knew, for example, that it was going to be disclosed to, among other people, the lawyers and parties who are here today; correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yeah.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Mr. Commissioner, there’s one issue I wish to raise that concerns the rule about the use of these statements. And it specifically concerns the suggestion that Chief Sloly made a statement that one of the witnesses Ms. Carrier referred to. May I simply ask the witness to confirm that the statement that she provided to you was not found anywhere in her statement?
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
I think you can go ahead and ask whether or not that's -- she's made that statement before, but ---
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Thank you.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
--- I don't think you can cross-examine on that statement, unfortunately.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
That's fine.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
It was not put into evidence, and we don't know the circumstances in which that was done, et cetera, but I ---
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
That's fair.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
--- I'll give you some latitude.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Thank you very much. Ms. Carrier, prior to your saying that Chief Sloly told you on a call that he was scared, am I correct that you didn't say that before to anyone?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
To the Commission?
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Yes.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Like I've said it several times, yes, but not to -- perhaps I didn't say it the day of the Commission interview.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Well, do you accept from me that the statement of your anticipated evidence doesn't refer anywhere to the ---
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Wait a minute. I don't think that's ---
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay. All right.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
This is not a statement of anticipated evidence. I think that's been made clear.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
And I think that's going beyond what I allow.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
All right. Thank you. So then may I, Mr. Commissioner, because it's important, I'll simply say this, Ms. Carrier. Isn't it true that what Chief Sloly said on the call was that he understood why people in the community get -- including, presumably, from the BIA, were frightened in respect of what they were observing and experiencing, but at no time did Chief Sloly say that he was scared or frightened personally? Would that be fair to him?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
No.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
All right.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I think he said -- I think it was definitely in the intention that you were saying. I don't think that he was, like, I'm terrified and I don't know what I'm doing. That's not what I'm implying. What I'm implying is that he was very candid with us. You know, we had gone through a very difficult weekend. He was very candid with us. And he, I think, was relating that he too was scared. There are things that were happening that -- you know, there was a lot going on.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
But that was not something that you have said previously?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I have said that several times previously, but not to the Commission.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay. And ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
And ---
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
--- can you tell me, please, Ms. Carrier, on what date did that meeting take place?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
To my recollection, I don't recall. I believe it was the Tuesday after the 1st.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
But you don't recall?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
So the 1st or 2nd of February, I would assume.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Right. You would assume. Can you tell us what else the Chief described? Any specifics that he described?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
He described a very fluid moving protest, an occupation. He described what he had said a lot in the press conference, that there were lack of resources, that this was something that was evolving by the minute, that this was unprecedented. I want to say I have tremendous respect at that time for Chief Sloly, and I believe -- you know, I don't know what his intentions were, but I believe in that moment, it was fluid.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Right. Can I just leave it on this basis? Because, of course, you can imagine that your statement that he said that ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Right.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
--- he was personally scared, he's going to -- I just have to tell you, he's going to say ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Okay.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
--- he didn't say that.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Right.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
But instead, he was expressing why he understood people were frightened.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I would concede too that that was the intention, yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
What I said.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
The expression of empathy.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Thank you, Mr. Commissioner, and thank you to the witnesses.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. That's -- the next is the Democracy Fund, Citizens for Freedom, JCCF.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY ROB KITTREDGE
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Good morning. My name is Rob Kittredge and I just have a couple of questions for you. For the sake of time, I will just address them to Ms. Carrier. Ms. Carrier, when speaking with Commission Counsel, you said that businesses were completely crippled and noted that access to loading zones, access by delivery services, et cetera, was an issue for some businesses.
John Mather, Counsel (POEC)
Excuse me, Mr. Commissioner, there has been a couple references during this examination to these statements of anticipated evidence, and I think it's important that the nature of those statements get clarified before any questioning continues. Those are statements that are provided to Commission Counsel. They are not attributable to the witness. They are statements of what Commission Counsel anticipate a witness may or may not say. They should -- it is Commission Counsel's view that they should only be questioned upon in extraordinary circumstances, and they shouldn't be serving as the basis for these examinations.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
I'm basing that on a statement that was made to Commission Counsel that businesses were completely crippled.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Are you referring to the statements during the hearing, sir?
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Statements during the hearing.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Then that's fine.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
And all of these items came from the statement. I'm aware of the issue. So would it be fair to say that from your perspective, the primary cause of these issues was congestion resulting from illegal parking in downtown streets?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I think that was one of the issues.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
But specifically, the -- I'm talking about specifically the issues with regard to access to loading zones, access by delivery services, and those sort of things, with regard to those issues, would you say the primary cause was congestion?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Sorry, when I consider congestion, I consider that a fluid moving traffic of congestion. This was not a fluid moving traffic of congestion. This was blockaded.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Okay.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
This was -- these were cars that were parked that weren't moving. These were loading zones. These were handicapped parking that were being blocked for hours and days on end, well beyond the normal ---
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
I think we may be in violent agreement here.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Okay.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
The -- I'm ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Sorry.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
You'd say that illegal parking was the ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Definitely.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
--- proximate cause of those issues?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
And does the City of Ottawa typically enforce parking laws and bylaws?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Typically, yes, very well.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
And in the context of the convoy protest, there wasn't any real enforcement of parking laws and bylaws; was there?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
There wasn't the usual level that we would be accustomed to in the circumstance like this.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
And you were not satisfied with the level of enforcement?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I will be honest and tell you that this was not a problem that was specific to Vanier, but on behalf of my colleagues and BIAs that are central, we were not satisfied with the level to which ---
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Okay.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
--- those types of things were being dealt with.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Thank you. You mentioned that unlicensed free food services were being operated on the sidewalks immediately outside Ottawa restaurants and that this negatively impacted restaurant revenues. Do you remember making that statement today?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I do.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Does the City of Ottawa typically allow unlicensed food services to operate on city sidewalks?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Absolutely not.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
In the context of the convoy protest, there was no real enforcement of food licensing requirements; was there?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
No.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
All right.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
And I can tell you, I just ran an event where there was two people serving food, local businesses, and they were more enforced ---
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Right.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
--- than anything I saw then.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Right. You also stated that you saw tents set up -- I believe this was -- oh, and I'll -- you indicated that -- or it was indicated that many businesses chose to close during the convoy protests and that this was a choice and not a requirement. Do you remember that statement being made by your colleague?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I do remember that statement being made by my colleague.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
And but some businesses chose to remain open and did quite well revenue wise due to the increased foot traffic resulting from the protest; is that correct?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Some I think did well, yes.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
All right. Well, those are my questions. Thank you very much.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
No, they did not? I don't know. I -- I'm not the best person to answer that question, but sorry.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Next is the counsel for the Government of Canada.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. BRENDAN van NIEJENHUIS
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Thank you, Commissioner. And sorry to single you out, Ms. Carrier, but I wanted to ask you just a few questions about your emails. My name is Brendan van Niejenhuis and I'm one of the counsel for the Government of Canada.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Thank you.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Could we call up COA-00000073? While that's coming up, Ms. Carrier, you provided some of your own content that we watched earlier to the Ottawa Police Services, but you also provided some open-source social media content from what you found online; right?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I did.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And that was usually to a Sébastien Lemay there?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Was that your usual contact?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
During the occupation, yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay. And so this item here, if we can just go down to the bottom, you're providing Sébastien Lemay with a link to a TikTok Live; is that right?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And you say it's Ottawa jam the airport?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
What do you recall or what was your interpretation of what you saw and sent to him?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I believe that specific TikTok Live was Pat King TikToking Live, so broadcasting live from his car, stating that he and other vehicles were leaving Coventry and on our way to the airport to disrupt the airport as well.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay. If we can go to another example, it's COA-00000118. And again, if we just go to the bottom here, this is on February the 8th; is it?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
It looks like, yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Yes, and you sent again another TikTok Live to Sébastien Lemay at the Ottawa Police Service?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct, yes, I did.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Yes. You say, "On this TikTok Live, they are openly discussing tactics for breaking laws." (As read) Right?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Do you recall anything about the specific content of this TikTok Live that you are reporting to him?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
There was a lot that I sent, but I believe in this particular one was references to diesel cans being filled with water and not diesel to confuse police officers. And there -- and I don't recall the rest.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I apologise. I did not review this particular slide.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
No, that's fine. That's part of the nature of the TikTok live is that it ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Right.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
--- is it ephemeral or it goes away after the stream is done generally?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Yes, although you can save copies of -- you can record your screen on your phone. So ---
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Am I correct ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
So often TikTok lives will be rebroadcast as non-live events.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And in fact, if you go up to the top of this document, you see Sebastien LeMay's reply to you addresses that precise question; right? "Do you know if there is a way to view TikTok lives after the fact?" (As read) Right?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
That's correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And you've just told us that you can do that if -- am I correct, that that's only if the streamer actively chooses the -- chooses to make their TikTok Live available as a live replay?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
To be clear, I am not a TikTok expert, I'm just a hockey mom that watches way too much TikTok. But my knowledge is -- and certainly during this period. To my knowledge, the person can take their video and rebroadcast it, but also if I am watching your TikTok, I can record my screen and then share a version of that. So there are times after this where there were TikTok's that I recorded parts of the screen for my own posterity to remember.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
But there's a large volume, as you say, out there that you were looking at in large volume that from time to time you would send on to the police; right?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I wouldn't say a large volume that I sent on to them, but I would certainly report back to them, and Sebastien, and in the daily meetings there were things that I would report from what I had seen the night before.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay. And you weren't in a position to be able to record large volumes of it for ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I was not in that situation.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay. Can we go lastly to COA 6068? But you were asked earlier about complaints that you had received from members of your BIA and their contacts, and some of those questions were about being informed that the Canadian Tire Store near Coventry had sold out of bear spray; right?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
This particular one, I believe is the -- oh, yes. This particular email is not the bear spray email.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
This is not, that's correct.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Right.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
But I'm just reminding you that you were asked about that earlier.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Oh, yes. Yes, I was asked about this earlier. So I would report back on some of the things that I would hear from the manager.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Sure. And here again, this is -- this is, you know, the top is Sebastien LeMay thanking -- it's Sebastien LeMay thanking you for sending this along; right?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And if you go to the very bottom of this what you're forwarding here, the -- if you keep going to the very bottom email from February the 10th, do you see that?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I do.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
This is what you're relying on, that the Canadian Tire, at least according to what you have been told, has also sold out of gas cans, Canadian flags ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
--- and the powerful hand held horns and smaller marine horns?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
This was on the first weekend or, like, around the first and second weekend, yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
And this was from my community association with who we work very closely.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay. And you reported that on to the police?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I reported it to the police, correct. There was a sense at times that BIAs were sort of in a position to have the ear of people, so there -- oftentimes our community associations will rely on us for those types of things.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Thank you, those are my questions.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Thank you.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. And finally, the, or next is the Ottawa Coalition.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. PAUL CHAMP
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Good afternoon, Kevin and Nathalie.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Good afternoon.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Good afternoon.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
I think you're going to be a TikTok star after your performance today.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Oh, my god. My husband told me this was going to happen, and I said no. Sorry.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Kevin, to start with, a couple of questions for you. WE heard that some businesses did stay open, you know, not which -- you know, notwithstanding the different people coming in with masks and so forth. Did you hear from your members or have any information about how those businesses felt they did revenue-wise as compared to they might at other times?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
A couple of businesses, we have -- you know, we have a number of tourist shops on Sparks Street, so the owner reported, you know, he sold a lot of Canadian flags. They were moving out of the store very quickly. It's a product he sells regularly. But -- and then we had some eateries that would try to open and try to close, in particular in that first weekend. Again, they were just trying to serve customers. And some actually even saw it as a potential opportunity because again we had been under this unexpected lockdown over the Christmas season and through January. My members, we were all set to host Winterlude, which is a massive event here in the City of Ottawa, and my members, we had just found out a couple of weeks before that it had been cancelled because of the COVID surge. So a lot of my businesses were like seeing that, oh, maybe there's an opportunity again on a weekend to make some money. But the ones that did stay -- did open, most -- the vast majority just found it just impossible to manage the crowd and keep their staff safe and to avoid confrontation in their stores.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Right. And just to confirm, I'm not sure if it's been clarified precisely in the evidence so far, at the time of the first weekend of the convoy there had been a complete lockdown; stores and restaurants weren't allowed to be open; is that right?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And then after, when they were allowed to open, public health regulations around the mandatory of wearing a mask was still in place; is that correct?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Okay.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Very much so.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And you told us that -- about some businesses concerned about being open because of having to enforce the mask public health guideline?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Did some of them encounter other issues making it difficult for them to open? For example, staff being able to make it to their location?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
I didn't specifically hear that. A lot of the businesses, again, many of our businesses because of COVID didn't have staff. Where they'd have two and three staff working a sandwich shop, for example, it was down to just the owner of the business. So that owner would try to make a go of it on their own, but that would be the unmanageableness of -- I mean, there's still limitations on the number of people in your business, and then again, you -- getting a large group of people in your place and trying to manage that crowd, it was quite difficult for them.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
The -- you told us that some of the information that you were told to get from the Ottawa Police was by following social media and so forth ---
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Right.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
--- of the police. Can you recall, were the Ottawa Police putting out any guidelines or advisories with respect to the population generally in Ottawa about going downtown?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah, advisory to citizens was to avoid the downtown area if possible, which a vast majority of people just take as stay away. And we've seen that twice now with the motorcycle event a few months later and some other activations now. But businesses never get that instruction. The instruction to business has always been business owner must make that decision on -- with their best judgement. And so that can be very difficult for a business. Again, they feel the pressure to, if they do have staff, keep their staff. They don't want to cut their hours, but business has been so hard and so how do you -- you know, if you do have staff now you're paying them, it's coming out of your pocket, it's been -- economically it's been a very difficult two years for small business, and -- so it's hard to make those decisions. So even when they would try to just open themselves, again, you would just -- no one was coming into the businesses to buy per se, certainly on the retail and service side, they were just coming in to warm up and see if they could use the bathroom more often than not.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thanks. I'm going to ask you a question about a document, and I'll just the registrar if they can put it up. It was the OPS document ending in 3228. It's OPS 3228. And when you get it up, I want to go to page 6. While we're waiting for that to get up, Kevin, you had mentioned about Google reviews.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
M'hm.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
I've heard about a local law firm that has suddenly seen their ratings plummet from these one star reviews. Have any of your members heard of any way to correct that?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
You can contact the Google or Yelp and look to provide evidence as to why that could happen.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And just to follow on. If you followed up with Google several times about that, any other tips or guide?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
They're a bit of a beast to deal with, yes.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thanks. Okay, great. So this is OPS 3228. Can you roll to the -- just the end of this page? Okay, just stop there, actually: "So our community police officers are in touch with Downtown BIAs in providing with updates to expect large crowds and traffic obstruction." (As read) So that was the information that was put to you by the Ottawa Police Council. Can you just go down, keep going down? Keep going. Okay, here. Here, this is internal Ottawa Police. They're talking about what information should be provided to BIAs: "Hi Julie. Do you know if OPS is or will be in discussion with some of the BIAs that could be see big impacts?" (As read) And I think this is about January 25th.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
M'hm.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
"I recall OPS having these types of discussions for previous events, is that the case for this event? (As read) So just on that, when there's other big events that are happening, or big demonstrations, or protests, does OPS share information with the BIAs typically about road shutdowns or interruption in service or bus routes and stuff like that?
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Yeah, the -- I would just -- I go back to the Canada Day as a prime example or Remembrance Day as an example where road closures are in place to allow the celebration of Canada Day or support our veterans and our past veterans, where there's a memo come out with road closures and et cetera, et cetera. It's pretty standard, in the corp. It's very rare that I would get something, per se, from OPS, which is very detailed. I mean, we saw that note come out that said call 9-1-1 or call 3-1-1. That's pretty standard in Ottawa for years that that's what you -- that's how you triage everything here. So but in terms of actually having a Zoom call or a specific communication going just to BIAs in our area specifically around Parliament Hill, which would be myself, Bank Street and Byward, no. I don't often get much.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thanks, Kevin. Nathalie, I just have a couple questions for you. Just to assist some of the people and some of the counsel who may not be from Ottawa, I think there might be some misconceptions about where Coventry Road and the location, the parking lot where all those trucks were set up, where that is in relation to downtown Ottawa.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
So it's slightly northeast five kilometres from downtown Ottawa.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
So it's -- okay. So it's ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
But it is joined -- so you can loop from -- normally, you can loop from Beechwood to St. Patrick's to King Edward or Dalhousie and then back from Rideau, that turns into Montreal Road and so forth so.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Okay. And we've heard some reference at -- or we will hear reference about a red zone, that the Ottawa Police was calling the red zone. Where was the red zone?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I believe -- in the beginning ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Roughly.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
--- there was no red zone in Vanier. I think it ended at the river.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Yeah.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
There was no red zone in Vanier, despite me stating that there was more happening at Coventry.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Right.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
But the red zone was not - - Vanier was not in the red zone.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Right.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
It was, to my knowledge, I think, SJAM, so Sir John A Macdonald Parkway to I think it was Bank, Catherine, and then down towards the market.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
So Coventry Road was about five kilometres from the red zone?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct. Well, it would have been at that point, like, at the edge of the red zone, maybe two or three kilometres ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And the continuous honking, was that going on at Coventry in the same way as it was in the red zone?
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
There were moments that it was very loud there and other times that it wasn't. There was a sense that that was their recovery area as well. There -- you know, that's where the hot tubs got delivered on the second weekend. There was, you know, food and there was a very jovial sort of atmosphere at times and other times a very tense atmosphere there. So there was, you know, daytime you'd see a lot of families, they were heading downtown, and then in the evenings, things would seem a bit more ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
So ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Depends on the -- there tension days; right? There were days that were -- it's a long period. Some days were different.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
So, like, it appeared that some people would go to the red zone and then go back ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
--- to come back for a respite from ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
As I said earlier, there - - it felt like there was, like, almost shifts that were running. You know, people that would either bring stuff downtown, and then come back. There was a sense of, like, you know, almost, like, a base camp where sandwiches were being made and then shipped to downtown, and then, you know, there was -- I saw myself lots of jerry cans being filled with gas in very unsecure -- certainly not legal by normal standards ways, you know, off the back of a pickup truck in a big oil barrel, in -- or, you know, cisterns or things like that on the ground in Coventry parking lot.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Yeah, and you told us a bit about permits and so forth, you know, permits for tents, for example. You were mentioning about, like, engineering that to be checked for -- why would they be checked for engineering because of ---
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
One, most tents used in events have to be fire retardant. So if you're going to cook within a tent, it has to have a fire retardant fabric, so that if anything happens, it won't -- you know, it won't cause a huge fire. There's also levels of pressure, so often big tents need to be anchored either into -- with spikes into ground or they have to be held back by big concrete slabs. And often, an engineer has to determine, you know, how much concrete needs to hold it if the wind takes it or -- so there's lots of different regulations around building and to build it is high, so you would need fall safety to put some of those tents up, depending on, you know, how high your pole is. Anything over six feet that you climb on a ladder you need a fall safety training, for example. So there's lots of just little things like that, I mean, that people likely do in their farms or anywhere most times, but not usually as part of a big public event in the middle of the nation's capital.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Right. And these permits, what is your understanding of the purpose of these permits? Is it just a way for the city to generate revenue, or do they serve -- -
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
No, I think it's all about public safety; right? It's about public safety and standards of operation that are based on years and years of the city, you know -- Ottawa's often called the festival city. We host -- you know, I think there's 120 festivals in the summer here in Ottawa, so there's a lot of -- you know, it's really about public safety.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
You're ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Oh, my last ---
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
--- out of time.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Can I ask one last question or am I ---
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Go ahead.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Okay. You had told us, Nathalie, about the interaction with Chief Sloly and your recollection of what he said. Is there some reason why that resonated so much to you? Or actually, I should put it another way.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
I mean, I think because at -- you know, because at times like this, in what was considered, for us at least, a crisis, for a lot of people in Ottawa a crisis, you turn to your leaders to have a plan and to be stable. And I remember very specifically feeling, and I will say feeling for the sake of, you know, this audience, feeling like there was a sense that maybe our leaders were a little shaken. And that's scary.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thank you very much, and thank you, Commissioner, for the indulgence.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Any brief additional question?
RE-EXAMINATION BY MR. JEAN-SIMON SCHOENHOLZ
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
I have one question in re-exam. Mr. McHale, it was put to you some questions about federal assistance. Were there any costs that that federal assistance did not cover -- or federal or provincial ---
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Well, there were limitations on how much coverage there was, so each business was 15,000 total. So -- which depending on the size of business, so while, you know, you may not have hit the full use of the fund, an individual business may have only incurred 2 or $3,000 of expenses during that time, it didn't cover potential lost sales, as an example. So that's obviously a big thing, so you weren't able to factor in your gross revenues lost that you could compare to a couple years ago or year before. Your rent may not have been the full coverage amount. The other side would be is that a larger operator, a large independent restaurant would potentially -- the rent would be $10,000. So the 10,000 or $15,000 was really insignificant to their operating costs. So it was -- I would say that the majority of my members did -- absolutely benefitted from that funding. It was very much appreciated, especially in the way -- how quickly it flowed into the downtown businesses that were affected -- I'll use the word unprecedented positively in the sense of how quickly it came in. Unfortunately, for a lot of businesses, it didn't quite meet what they needed in order to make the recovery from the three, four weeks of business loss. I would also say that because businesses specifically on Sparks Street were actually fenced in after the protesters, an activation was moved because the security perimeter was kept up for an additional week. So there was a lot of limited -- a number of businesses in the downtown core were affected for a week after the occupation was done.
Jean-Simon Schoenholz, Counsel (POEC)
Thank you.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Well, we're at the time for lunch. It's -- if we could come back at two o'clock, that would be much appreciated because we have a big afternoon, which will probably take us past six o'clock and maybe even past seven o'clock. So again, I want to thank counsel for respecting the timelines. That's much appreciated, particularly on a day like today where we have a lot of evidence. So we're going to reprise until two o'clock. And thank you to the witnesses. I forgot.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
That's fine.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Thank you both.
Kevin McHale, Executive Director (Sparks BIA)
Thank you.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Much appreciated. Un grand merci.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Merci beaucoup.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Retournez à ma ville natale de Vanier.
Nathalie Carrier, Executive Director (Vanier BIA)
Oui. Ah oui? C'est bien. Moi aussi, ma famille ---
The Registrar (POEC)
The Commission is in recess for one hour.
Upon breaking at 1:03 p.m.
Upon resuming at 2:00 a.m.
The Registrar (POEC)
The Commission has reconvened. La Commission reprend.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Thank you. Merci. Vous remarquerez que j’essaye d’être ponctuel, je ne garantis pas que ça va toujours être le cas, mais c'est une déformation de vingt ans comme juge, alors je m’en excuse à l’avance, mais ça va être la façon qu’on travaille. Okay. So we have, I believe, another panel that’s ready to go, Ms. Rodriguez?
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you, Commissioner. I’d like to call Councillor Catherine McKenney and Councillor Mathieu Fleury to the stand, please.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
C'est correct si je reste assis?
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Oui, oui. Oui, oui. Prenez votre temps. Take your time. Get settled down.
The Registrar (POEC)
Councillor McKenney, will you swear on a religious document or do you wish to affirm?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I’ll affirm, please.
The Registrar (POEC)
For the record, please state your full name and spell it out.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Catherine Ann McKenney. C-A-T-H-E-R-I-N-E A-N-N M-C-K-E-N-N-E-Y.
COUNCILLOR CATHERINE McKENNEY, Affirmed
The Registrar (POEC)
Do you solemnly affirm that the evidence to be given by you to this Commission shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I do.
COUNCILLOR MATHIEU FLEURY, Sworn
The Clerk (POEC)
Monsieur Fleury, voulez-vous prêter serment ou faire une affirmation solennelle?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Sur la bible.
The Clerk (POEC)
Pour les fins du procès-verbal, s’il vous plait, veuillez indiquer et ensuite épeler votre nom en entier.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Alors, mon nom est Mathieu Fleury — M-A-T-H-I-E-U —, dernier nom, Fleury — F-L-E-U- R-Y.
The Clerk (POEC)
Jurez-vous que le témoignage que vous allez rendre devant la Commission sera la vérité, toute la vérité, et rien que la vérité? Que Dieu vous vienne en aide.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Oui.
The Clerk (POEC)
Merci.
EXAMINATION IN-CHIEF BY MS. NATALIA RODRIGUEZ
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Good afternoon to both of you. Can I confirm, you both had an interview with Commission Counsel on September 8 of this year? Is that correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And you’ve had a chance to review the interview summary that was prepared as a result of that interview; correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct, yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And we have that witness interview summary at WTS.00000025. And I’m just going to pull it up here for you to see. And while we’re doing that, Councillor McKenney, do you have any corrections you would like to make to your witness summary?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I do not.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And Councillor Fleury, are there any corrections you would like to make to the witness summary?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
There are.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. Yes. Please, as we’re waiting for that to be pulled up? Yes. Thank you. And do you know approximately ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I can pull it up. I have it in here.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Oh, okay. Well maybe we’ll scroll down a bit. Maybe just tell us what areas ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It’s the area about - - keep going down. Keep going down. Going down. I thought maybe it was above that.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
I think it might be up a little bit.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Let’s keep going up. I believe it’s on this page here above the harassment section. Let’s see there.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
“Physical violence ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
That’s right.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
--- or threats.” Okay. So maybe I’ll give you an opportunity then to indicate what needs to be corrected.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
So the paragraph that begins with: “Councillor Fleury’s home address was posted online without his consent. As a result, a group of protestors drove in a pick-up truck to Councillor Fleury’s home and attempted to intimidate him. He and his family had to relocate until the protest subsided. Councillor Fleury reported the situation to OPS, but he never heard back from them. Councillor Fleury’s wife is Chinese-Canadian and was subject to online threats and abuse.” (As read)
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So how would you like to change that witness statement? What aspects would you - --
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
They’re really three separate components. I would define them as -- the first one is any public office holder, our information can unfortunately be found online in some instances, and I believe that that’s how protesters were able to find my home address and show up. The second section, as a result, all the way to “back from them” is accurate.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
And then the final piece relating to my wife is about the abuse that we received as elected officials through email, phone calls, online.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So we will make those changes, and subject to those changes, the witness summary will be entered into evidence.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Thank you.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Now, I understand that both of you are councillors to the City of Ottawa. Is that correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
And proud.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Can you tell me a little bit about the wards you represent? Catherine McKenney, we’ll start with you.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
The ward I represent is Somerset Ward. We’re located in it. The boundary is the Canal to the Trillium Line, just west of Preston, and then north to the Ottawa River, south to the Queensway, except that Preston, it goes down to Carling for about three blocks and then back up LeBreton.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Councillor Fleury?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
So my area is called Rideau-Vanier. It is the communities of Lower Town, some would say the ByWard Market, Sandy Hill, which includes the University of Ottawa, and the former City of Vanier. My western, or where Councillor McKenney and I share a boundary is the Rideau Canal. So the first property in my ward is the Château Laurier.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. Perfect. So I’m going to pull up a Google Map that we’ve created. It’s been shared with the parties. And the orange section on the left there, Councillor McKenney, can you confirm whether that accurately represents the boundaries of your ward?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it does.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And the area, the orange area on the right there, Councillor Fleury, maybe we can just go over where the boundary is, especially in the middle of the two. It’s a little bit hard to distinguish. Yeah. Right there.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, the Rideau Canal.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yeah, that’s the Rideau Canal there. Okay. So Councillor Fleury, can you confirm that that area represents the boundaries of your ward?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And now I just want to take a moment to look at the geography of Ottawa as it relates to the events in question a little bit more closely, because as we know, there are people from outside of Ottawa that are watching and may not have a sense of Ottawa geography. We’ve touched on a few things this morning, but generally, we can see Parliament Hill, if we can just zoom in on Parliament Hill. There we go. And there’s a grey line that’s directly in front of Parliament Hill there. And that represents Wellington Street, where a lot of the protest activity was happening. And if we zoom out from here and we look at the areas that are south of Parliament Hill that are captured in your wards, Councillor McKenney, can you give us a sense for where the residential areas on this map and whether they’re confined to a specific area, or they’re kind of sprinkled throughout, or whether there’s a larger concentration in some areas?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, of course. So the largest concentration is -- occurs from Laurier going -- you know, going south.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So Laurier, if we can just ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
--- zoom in a little bit? That’s Laurier there?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Is that correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes. And ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And it goes south from there?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
And it goes south from there. And of course, Laurier from Kent going west.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yeah.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
On Laurier, there are several high rises as well.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yes. And so we see Kent. We have the cursor right now at Kent and Laurier. So that’s the intersection there?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And then on the east side, how far on the east and west sides do the residential areas expand?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
The densest parts are to Metcalfe to the east, although there are some residential -- some residences on Elgin, but Elgin is a traditional mainstreet. So Metcalfe, ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yeah.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
--- certainly. And then going west, Bronson, however, Bronson going -- you know, past Bronson going down Wellington towards Sir John A. MacDonald Parkway also has some multi-residential buildings there as well. But Bronson, certainly in the Centretown area, is the border.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Councillor Fleury, where would the residential areas in your ward that were affected in this case by the convoy -- where would those be located on this map?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I think the close -- the first location would be right beside the new Senate, former Union, which is 700 Sussex, at the corner of Sussex and Rideau.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay, so yeah, that’s right ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Across -- right beside the Chateau Laurier.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yeah, so we’re right there.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, across the street. So everything behind it is mixed use. There’s a lot of ground-floor commercial but a lot of low-rise residences in the Byward Market. And then along Rideau Street, you have these high -- very high-density buildings that are 20-storey and above right -- starting at the Rideau Centre with 90 George, you have the Four Claridge Towers; you have the East Market Condos which are on Cumberland; and you have a lot of density along Rideau. One street up -- one street south, which would be on Besserer, and you have a lot of density along Cumberland as well.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And, Councillor McKenney, can you -- if we can go back to the residential centretown kind of area. Okay, yeah, there we are. Can you maybe give us a sense for -- and we’ll get to the basis of your knowledge on this in a second, but can you maybe give us a sense for how widespread the trucks were when the convoy was in Ottawa? Where did they go to in terms of blocking the roads and kind of establishing themselves?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
So primarily on Kent going south, as far down as Kent and Somerset is as far the occupation ever really extended, so Kent to Somerset, Bank Street.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So just one second.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
All right.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So let’s just get to Kent and Somerset for a second and maybe we’ll just -- we’ll put a pin in there just so that we can visualize it. So I believe Somerset is ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, just up from ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Just up -- yeah, just in that corner there, right?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yeah, right there. Yeah, so that’s Kent and Somerset. Are we able to drop a pin? Okay, well, we’ll have to, then, just visually visualize it ourselves, okay. So let’s zoom out from there. Okay. And then -- so that would be kind of the southeast -- the southwest corner?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And where else from there?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Bank Street had truck parked on it down Bank as far as, I would say, Lisgar. So Lisgar is just north of Somerset ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay, yeah.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
--- one block north.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yeah, one block north of there, okay.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
And then Metcalfe and O’Connor but it would expand during the weekends when more vehicles came into the city on the weekends. So Metcalfe and O’Connor, at times, mostly on the weekends, could have a lot of vehicles parked ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yeah.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
--- but it did expand and contract depending on the time of the week.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So several blocks south from Parliament down to Somerset is about -- it was six or seven blocks south and then expanding maybe five blocks east to west?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay, thank you. And, Councillor Fleury, then, in terms of where the convoy expanded into in your area, can you give us a sense based on the map?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it started in front of Chateau Laurier ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yes, okay.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
--- so what would be One Rideau.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Right, right there.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah. Went through the intersection of Sussex. There were a number of -- you know, further down towards the Shaw Centre, further up towards George Street, all the way down Rideau Street, up to Waller.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yeah, so we just got to go up on the map a little bit here.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, they’re ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Oh, other way.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It’s going east.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
There we go.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
That’s right.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yeah, that’s right. So we’re going that way now, okay.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
So towards King Edward ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yeah.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
--- there were rigs along King Edward and there were rigs all the way to the Loblaws on Rideau, which is at Nelson and Rideau. So that was the furthest eastern segment. And then were sections of rigs beside the University of Ottawa, Desmarais Building on Nicholas.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Right, and we see a pin there just on the bottom there. Now, there’s a pin at the top there where it says “Shepherds of Good Hope” and I understand there was incident there.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Did the trucks expand up to that area?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So if we can expand -- if we can zoom out, rather. So we can -- it seems pretty expansive, then, if we’re looking all the way up there and then down to the residential areas in Centretown. Okay, so that’s very helpful to get a sense for the scope and breadth that we’re talking about when we’re discussing some of these issues. Okay, I think we can take the map down for now. Just a high level -- and we’re going to get into more details but I just wanted to ask at a high level how the residents in your ward were impacted by the protests of January and February of this year. Councillor McKenney, I’ll start with you.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Well, on the first weekend, people were braced for, you know, what they anticipated would be serious disruption. They were surprised when -- and frustrated and angry when the city and/or police allowed trucks to actually enter non-truck routes. So trucks -- very large trucks parked along Queen Elizabeth Driveway, for example, which is not a truck route, and stayed there for the weekend, and then coming down Kent, Metcalfe, O’Connor. So there was, you know, that first weekend, more of a bracing just to kind of get through the weekend. Started to see almost immediately -- and I started to receive emails and it was on social media -- symbols of hatred, you know, swastikas and Confederate flags, you know, Pride flags being, you know, targeted, so there was fear. Certainly, people that first weekend who were reporting back to me, and calling me, and emailing were fearful but they were braced for it and, you know, had been told that would it end on Monday and waited for that. So after Monday, when it didn’t end, it just became -- you know, in the words of people who were, you know, calling me and talking to me, they felt that they were under a great deal of threat, seniors reporting that they, you know, had trouble going out, they felt threatened when they went into a grocery store, you know, residents not being able to leave their apartments. I had to help on couple leave the downtown with a police escort on the first weekend. There was a Pride flag in their window. They’re apartment was targeted. Somebody had defecated on the back step. And then later that night, you know, a pickup truck with angry people in it came back and were harassing and yelling at them so, at that point, they felt very unsafe and we had a police escort them out. So it was, you know, a general sense of fear, terror, and, you know, dismay that they felt abandoned by their city and by their police.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Councillor Fleury, how about you?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I’d like to add ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Sure.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
So just to recognize that everything my colleague said is very similar to the realities I face -- that our communities face. I would add that the number of closures -- we have, in my community, one of the largest commercial properties, which is the Rideau Centre located at the corner of Rideau and Colonel By. There’s 300 business in the Rideau Centre. I’m told by the general manager, close to 3000 employees, and they were forced to close on the first Saturday and it took them about four hours, with help from police, to properly close the facility. Many of the businesses in the Byward Market -- there’s around -- it’s hard to give you an official because there’s businesses along Rideau Street; there’s businesses in the Byward Market. Many of them closed for the weekend and never reopened. Those who stayed open, many closed after that first weekend because of incidents with staff. And many incidents were reported relating -- there were a number of restrictions in place at the time? Mask wearing -- restaurants were not open. There’s a number of elements like that which created many incidents with part-time restaurant staff in the Byward Market and on Rideau Street. And then the non-stop noise of that first weekend, we have, as you've seen this morning and as we’ve encountered through the realities of walking through the site and communication with businesses and residents, just a non- liveable area for folks who lived in the Byward Market, lived on Rideau Street, lived on the northern part of Sandy Hill. Non- stop noise, the intimidation when they went out, specifically if they followed regulations and wore masks. There were a number of incidents where bus detours had to be conducted and we have communications with residents who, for example, waited for a Para-Transpo -- Para- Transpo is the accessible bus of Ottawa -- and couldn’t get to their cancer treatment because the bus couldn’t get there and they were not mobile. There were a number of incidents, as you know, and both Councillor McKenney and I, we have the LRT, the tunnel section. So if you want to access transit you have to walk -- go through long escalators to the platform. And there were a lot of movements between St. Laurent Shopping Centre and the downtown core. And many incidents on those trains that went unreported. And you know, fortunately OC Transpo did adapt but those first few days to weekends it was quite challenging. And so much so that many of the transit routes downtown just didn’t operate.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Councillor McKenney, were the businesses in your ward similarly affected?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, they were, Sparks Street in particular and also Bank Street. Bank Street ended up being closed down with trucks parked on it, all the way south to just north of Somerset. So I would say Lisgar. Again, on the weekends is when it really -- things would escalate. The transit stations were taken over. There were makeshift kitchens. There were barrels with fires burning on the street. And yeah, it was impossible for anyone to move about without encountering the people in the city who were occupying the city at the time.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. And I understand that during the second and third weeks particularly, both of you visited the site, walked around, walked the streets. Can you maybe describe a little bit of what you saw during those walks? I’ll start with Councillor Fleury.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Very different from weekends to week days. On week days it was more, let’s call them, permanent occupiers with the larger rigs. As the weekend approached, it was pickup trucks that would be parking anywhere and everywhere and kind of add to the existing weapons that were on the street and that tension that was existing.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Sorry, by “weapons” what do you mean by “weapons”?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Well, for us, you know, having the physical truck on the street created a big weapon in the spirit of the noise, the pollution of the fumes, the ability for folks to operate their businesses, to open, for us to offer services. There were a lot of rigs at the corner of Sussex and Rideau, and Rideau Centre is kind of that connection point on transit and for many of the access in and out of the market and on transit for routes that are coming from the western part of downtown and the eastern part of downtown. So not having access to that Rideau Sussex intersection created that congestion in that space. So I mean, I could go on and on but I think you get the picture that there were really really -- you couldn’t. You couldn’t live in that space. It was non-stop noise, non-stop pollution. You couldn’t get out because you’d hear yells. You’d get yelled at. There were a number of micro aggressions on the periphery of the red zone, particularly in residential communities which both Catherine and I lived firsthand and heard directly from residents. And then through the weekend it was this influx of pickup trucks who would not follow rules. Like, for example, in the market, you know, the Byward Market -- and just to locate you a little bit, at the corner of Byward and George Street there’s The Bay on one side. So there’s this big kind of sidewalk, if you will, that leads to Sussex. The road is pretty defined. It’s a one lane in each direction with parking bays on each side. Well, pickup trucks were just parked anywhere and everywhere in any direction, on the sidewalk, in vehicular lanes, so even if residents or businesses, for example like The Bay, Chapters, and so on -- their loading zone is right there. They couldn’t physically get garbage in and out or their equipment if they wanted to open. So you kind of -- I’m giving you an example. It was the same issues along Rideau. It was the same issues along Nicholas, and in different parts of the Byward Market.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Councillor McKenney, what kind of issues did you observe on your walks?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
So I started to go out after the first weekend, Monday, when we knew that, you know, about 80 percent of the large trucks left. But the 20 percent that were left were remaining and had -- you could see no intention of leaving anytime soon. And as Councillor Fleury said, we would get this surge of people coming into the city who were sympathetic to the, you know, original convoy that had entered. I started to go out at that week, walk around. I would go through the convoy and observe. I would meet with residents who were feeling threatened. I delivered food to some people. I delivered pet food to some people, in particular, who were living in some of our community housing buildings who felt very threatened and not able to go out. I organized one -- what we called the safety walk so that we could come out together as a community. And that happened the second week. But you know, we stayed within the residential area away from, you know, where the convoy had taken root. We had organized a second one and we called it off because the environment just felt more threatening and I didn’t -- my fear through all of this and my key concern through all of this was the safety of residents that I represent. You know, there was nothing more on my mind than the safety of the people that live in the city and that I represent. So you know, again it would get the surge on the weekends and you know, I have stated before and I will again, you know, I was always careful when I went down, walked through the convoy. I was accosted on a few occasions but not, you know -- never felt that I was in any real danger. But walking home through the residential streets was always when I felt the most threatened. It’s often when I was threatened. You know, homophobic slurs, transphobic slurs, just you know, people recognizing me from media or other means. So it was more, you know, on the streets going home it was more those isolated incidents that were the greatest threat throughout the -- and that’s what I heard from residents as well. You know, it was uncomfortable. They had to stay safe walking through the convoy especially if they wore a mask, racialized. But it was outside of that where it was more so the people who were sympathetic to the convoy who were coming into the city and causing that type of fear.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And I'm going to take you then, Councillor McKenney, to a document that you received. It’s a video that was sent to you by a resident and you have mentioned that residents were communicating with you and sending you correspondence. It’s at OT00012814. Now, first of all, do you recall receiving this video from a constituent?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I do.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And the email indicates that it was on February 1st. Do you have a sense for where the video was taken just based on what you could see there? And we could just show it up again just to --maybe just a still shot of the video. Just on pause here. But does that give you a sense for where the video was taken?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes. It would indicate that it’s on Metcalf Street, either Metcalfe, Nepean. It's just behind the Shopify building, which is on Elgin.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And that's the one we're -- that blue kind of beige one that we're seeing there, that's the Shopify building?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And so this is a residential area?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it is.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And it's in your ward?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it is.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And is this consistent with the kind of sound level that you experienced in that area?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it is.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And this is, you know, one video that was sent to you, but were there others in similar kind of nature, or how would you this relative to the other emails and communications that you received?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Certainly, it was very consistent with other messages I received, but also social media that I was being sent. And also, just being in the area for days and having that type of horn noise going on almost 24/7, it was very -- it almost never stopped. It might for a half-an-hour now and then, and it would start up again, and it just traumatized residents. So it was very difficult to absorb that terror that residents were living under. It's why I just went down every day just so that I would be able to give voice to it.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And I'm going to take you now to another email you received, and it's at OTT, three zeroes, 14415. And so we can see that it's dated February 2nd, and the subject line is Centre Town Convoy Disruptions and Noise, and the sender starts by saying: "Good afternoon. I hope you're all having a peaceful afternoon. I'm not. I live on the intersection of Metcalfe and Cooper Streets in Downtown Ottawa. Since Friday, I have had a non-stop barrage of truck horns, a very illegal train horn, drunken revellers and plain old guys screaming in my neighbourhood. This is oftentimes directly outside of my window, and I am just above street level. See attached video to experience how loud it was this past Sunday. This started as early as 7:00 a.m., and over the weekend I heard honking and screaming until well past 1:00 a.m." (As read) Do you recall this email?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I do.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And this person indicates that they're at Metcalfe and Cooper. And can you confirm that's a residential area within your ward?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it is.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And this person describes horns as early as 7:00 a.m. and at times going past 1:00 a.m. Does that accord with your experience as well?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it does.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And if we look at the fourth paragraph, this person says: "Besides all of this, I have anxiety, constantly being on edge, not knowing how long I will have just a little peace and quiet, or if I will be able to safely get groceries. It's taking its toll on me. My jaw hurts from clenching non-stop, my heart constantly races, I have been sleeping on average of three to four hours a night, I can't stop shaking, I'm barely eating and my stomach ache is constantly upset. My anxiety is well-controlled in normal times, but prescribed medication and coping mechanisms can only do so much when the threat is real and constant." (As read) How would you say this resident's description of the impacts compares to the overall tone of communications that you were having with residents?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
This is one of hundreds of emails that I received with this very, very similar description of what was happening for people who lived in the residential area, in Centre Town. By this time, anybody who could leave was leaving. I had parents calling me from out of town trying to get their adult children out of that area. So this was the beginning when people in Centre Town, if they could leave they were, and people being -- people who were left behind, for the most part, relayed this type of experience to me for three-and-a-half weeks, and they had nowhere else to go.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And we're just going to look at the video that the constituents sent to you. It's at OTT, three zeroes, 14416. [VIDEO PLAYBACK] [END VIDEO PLAYBACK]
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Councillor Fleury, did you receive similar emails regarding impacts from your constituents?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Very similar, daily. Everything that Councillor McKenney is describing is what we were both hearing from any resident that was within the red zone or on the periphery of the red zone, plus a number of microaggressions that are described. People were scared to leave, even if they weren't in the red zone, and when they left there was a number of incidents near the red zone which created additional anxiety. The noise, the smells, the fumes non-stop. I mean, I think this email is actually pretty light compared to some of the emails we received, frankly. People were losing it and losing it on all -- you know, locally on us, as their councillor. We were trying to do our very best, on the City, on authorities, yeah, I think this email is actually pretty tame compared to some of the stuff we received.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. And so for your ward, did the -- you showed us on the map how far east the convoy was kind of established. Would you say that the noise issues were spread in a similar fashion to where you indicated the trucks were located in your ward?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes. As you know, Rideau Street has very high buildings, so the noise did bounce off some of those buildings creating larger zones. Because it is the, kind of the winter period, so the noise travels much further into the -- this is mixed use zones along Rideau and the ByWard Market, but into the pure residential zones of Lower Town area, and in the northern part of Sandy Hill, particularly.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. And we're going to go to a video provided to us by the affidavit of Sean Flynn that's been submitted by the Coalition of Businesses and Residents, and this is at COA, five zeroes, 132. Yes, five zeroes. [VIDEO PLAYBACK] [END VIDEO PLAYBACK]
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Councillor Fleury, can you -- are you able to tell us the location where that video was taken just based on the surroundings there?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, that's on Rideau Street, on the north side of Rideau Street, right before you get to Sussex Avenue.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And you walked through that area during ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Many times.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And does that accord with your recollection of what it was like walking through that area?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And we know from this morning that February 7th, one of the residents, Zexi Li, who testified earlier today, obtained an injunction to stop airhorns and train horns in the downtown area. Would you say that the noise level improved after February 7th, and if so, did it stay like that, you know, throughout or did it come back? How would you describe the noise level after February 7th? I'll start with Catherine McKenney.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it did subside. The horns certainly subsided. There were still some instances, you know, in the following days, where, you know, horns would start up again, but overall we were not getting, you know, that constant airhorn from 7:00 a.m. until 11:00 or 1:00 even. It did have a -- it did make a dramatic improvement in terms of the horns.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Councillor Fleury?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Agree.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And I want to just take you to another video, also in the affidavit of Sean Flynn. It's at Exhibit F, and the document ID is COA, five zeroes, 136. And before we play it, I just want to preface it that based on the affidavit it indicates that it's on February 12th, that's what the affidavit states, which would be after the injunction, and the affidavit states that it was on Albert and O'Connor. So with that context we can watch. [VIDEO PLAYBACK]
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So based on that, would you say that that accords with your recollection of what it would have been like around the 12th of February in the downtown area?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
So I’m not certain if February 12th was the weekend. What I can tell you is that on the weekends when we would get a surge of people who were sympathetic to the occupation coming into the city, it would become much, much more disruptive, much louder, but also even though after the injunction things were quieter, it would pick up at times, absolutely.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And February 12th would have been a Saturday. So ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That makes sense. It looked like a Saturday, judging from the video.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Councillor Fleury?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, agree.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And in terms of any kind of threats to safety, unruly behaviour, was any of that type of personal safety issues reported to you and/or did you witness any of that yourself, Councillor McKenney?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I didn’t personally witness any acts of violence. I was -- you know, I was told about them. I had -- actually, it was a friend. It was reported in the media. She’s 70, or was 70 at the time, and she was at the corner of Somerset and Bronson, and this was on a weekend. And a man who had come into the city, you know, who had flags on him and was part of the surge, the weekend surge, punched her in the face. So that’s a friend of mine. That’s somebody I know. I didn’t know it was her at the time when it was reported. I found out later that it was her. And someone reported to me that a friend of theirs was wearing a mask on our light rail train, was accosted for wearing the mask, and ended up having his nose broken. But that was -- that’s not something that I witnessed first hand. Also, we had instances, you know, where people reported back that, you know, they would try to go out, they were circled by people, you know, intimidating them, asking for police help, it just wasn’t there. People just felt very abandoned while there was, you know, the -- while this was happening in their residential area, in their neighbourhood. They also had no security. Everything was focused on Wellington Street and north of Laurier. And police just weren’t responding to the threats that people felt that they were under. So that was reported to me in hundreds of phone calls, as I was downtown with people, and just, you know, general lawlessness without any security available for people.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
How about you, Councillor Fleury?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, I would concur with the description and give additional additions to the matter. There were detour bus routes that were in effect that were on the periphery, if you will, of King Edward and Rideau and there was an elderly couple waiting for the bus with their mask, they were stripped off the mask waiting for the bus, just while they were waiting for the bus. In the ByWard Market, on the edge of the ByWard Market, we have an Andrew Fleck Childcare Centre, where there were a number of incidents, and I believe they had to -- I was communicated by the Executive Director that they had to close. They had reported a few days earlier, incidents that were happening. And ultimately, I believe on February 6th, they decided to close for kid’s and their own staff’s safety. There was media reports, and I had discussions with the Executive Director at Shepherds of Good Hope of the incident around one of the homeless residents who was assaulted and beaten up and where food was stolen at Shepherds of Good Hope. There were a number of incidents, too many to give you a full description, but there were a number of coffee shops that were remaining open, because coffee is sort of an easy pick up and go environment, and there were a number of incidents where crowds would come into these coffee shops and take over the space and threaten staff. And a number of encounters on Rideau Street and in the ByWard Market specifically.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So these were all incidences that were reported to you by constituents or business owners?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Business owners, the staff, and we would take that information and ensure that it was appropriately reported to the authorities, and we’d ask for clarification. At some point through the process, we had a liaison officer who we hoped, you know, we were conveying that, and we hoped that was following up on these incidents, but they kept happening. They kept happening. I describe them as microaggression, because they -- you know, it wasn’t the punching in the face, but it was all these microaggressions in transit, walking to businesses, childcare, homeless shelters. A number of these incidents that created an unsafe environment for residents and business operators in the area.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And when you say you were forwarding these to the authorities, who in particular were you forwarding these incidences to?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It depends. It depends, but usually it was an official at the City of Ottawa, either someone in Emergency Services, or the City Manager. And the Ottawa Police. And that depends as well. Early days, they weren’t as coordinated, so a lot of information directly to the Chief, and then after that, they created an environment where we were -- all councillors, but obviously Catherine and I more so, because we were flooded with communication by residents, we were providing that to the police authorities.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Councillor McKenney, did you forward, also, reports that you were receiving from your constituents to authorities? And if so, to whom?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes. So early on, I was. You know, not every email. I would, you know, answer emails, respond to emails, try to get as much information out to residents as possible. Every day I would consider what residents -- what information they needed. So I would respond in that way. It was just -- it was hundreds of emails. Four staff who did nothing but respond all day long. You know, certainly when it was, you know, if it was something that was, you know, was being relayed to me that, you know, criminal, you know, I would forward that to police. But by, you know, a week in, when I just didn’t feel anyone was taking the complaints very seriously and they were just getting more and more -- what I was hearing was just getting more and more serious and worrisome, I -- every day I would bundle up emails and send it to who was then the Chief of Police, the Police Services Board, our City Manager, Mayor, and I would just send it all and tell them, you know, it was for -- if I knew I would be hear one day, it was for the inevitable inquiry into what is going -- you know, what will be an inquiry into this. I just didn’t know what else to do by that point. I just didn’t feel that there was any support available for us.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Now I want to show a video that was part of the City of Ottawa’s productions. And it’s at OTT00010436. [VIDEO PLAYBACK]
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Now, first of all, have either of you seen this video before?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I have.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. Yes. And do you know the context in which it came to us in our production? Do you know who it belonged to or how it came to us, by any chance?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I do not.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No, I don’t.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
What I want to ask about it is, Councillor Fleury, you had used the term “weapons” when describing the trucks, and here in this video we see some unsafe behaviour. It appears to show a truck driving in the wrong lane against traffic on the sidewalk. Did you observe any kind of unsafe use of the trucks? Or what did -- can you expand on this notion of weaponizing that you mentioned earlier?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Sure. I was describing earlier the ByWard Market, where on weekends there were be the surge of folks. And obviously we have -- we’re used to protests in Ottawa, we’re used to events, we’re used to Canada Day, where 100,000 people come to downtown core and celebrate our country. There’s enough parking. There’s parking underground, there’s parking in the ByWard Market, paid parking. The rules of parking were not followed. People would park in any direction, would park on sidewalks. In a very pedestrian area, if you know the ByWard Market, it's small businesses, storefronts. It's really clear where you're supposed to park and where is the pedestrian route. So the surge of vehicles, pickups, is one of the aspects, and we saw that in different areas of my community. The Biker's Church in Vanier was one area. De La Salle High School was another one. Along Rideau Street and the ByWard Market were other areas. Nicholas were others. So there's that -- those incidents of people not following the rules of the road in pickup trucks, which is a different vehicle, which is a weapon in itself. But the weaponized description to me is really the rigs who take space on the street and make noise through the horns that you've shown in video. The fumes -- and I know reading through the evidence preparing for this, we weren't informed of Ottawa Public Health and the risk to the health, but we were getting a lot of complaints from business operators and residents in the area of the smells, the intoxication of those smells. So the compounding effect of noise, smells, the physical presence, the inability for folks to in some areas walk on the sidewalk, walk safely at a crosswalk. We have, like any community, folks with mobility needs, and getting on and off a curb anywhere and everywhere doesn't work safely. So that's the description of the weapon is that that truck took space on the road. The truck itself created an environment that was unsafe for the immediate neighbours and made it impossible for the -- what is our responsibility in terms of safety and wellbeing of residents and businesses in our community to safely live and be in the zone.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Councillor McKenney, I want to take you to an email that you received. It's at ORR-00017349. And if we go down to -- further down. Okay. So let me see. Go down a little bit more. Let's go down to the bottom. Okay. There we go. So this is an email from -- redacted, it's a constituent, so it's been redacted. It was sent on February 4th, and the -- yeah, there we go. And the subject line is complete absence of police on Metcalf Ottawa occupation. And so this email describes the -- says the occupation is growing on these streets. And then at the second paragraph it says, "OPS at 9:30 a.m. today said 150 officers would be deployed but there isn't one in sight 6 hours later, and they are only digging in to their Metcalf stronghold." (As read) Do you recall receiving this email?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I recall receiving emails. I can't say that I recall this one in particular, but I recall receiving emails that indicated that the residents did not feel that there was an OPS presence in Centretown.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And if we go a little bit up from here, we'll see that you forward that on, on the same day to city council, Peter Sloly, some OPSB members. You copy a member of Parliament Yasir Naqvi, Minister Mendicino and Steve Kanellakos, the City Manager. And you talk about an absence of police presence in our downtown neighbourhoods and the ever-expanding red zone. Do you recall sending that email?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, I do.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And why did you forward this complaint? Was this part of just a general practice of forwarding complaints on to this group of people?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
It was the beginning. You know, we -- this was, you know, the first week in, Monday. We expected the convoy to leave. It didn't. Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday things were just getting more and more chaotic, more dangerous for residents. We were, you know, we were told that there would be a heightened police presence in the residential areas, and it just didn't happen. You could walk around the residential areas and, well, the chaos was happening. People were being harassed. Sometimes they were being followed. They -- you know, certainly reporting back to me, you know, people who had been, you know, assaulted. And there was no police presence in their residential area. It was just all up at -- on the hill, on Wellington and the Parliamentary precinct area.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And if we go up a little bit from here, you say -- if you go up a little bit more just to look at the top, yeah, so just the bottom part of that page, the next day it looks like to the same group of people and you say, "This is the message I received back from OPS, which says today we had 20 to 25 officers patrolling Centretown as well as NRT members." (As read) And then you say, "20 to 25. A friend went out last night at midnight into the heart of Centretown and reported not one physical police presence. We continue to be abandoned in Centretown." (As read) Do you recall that?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, I do.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And if we go up a little bit more, you get a response from Carol Anne Meehan, and I understand she was a member of the Ottawa Police Services Board at that time; is that right?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That's correct.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And she says, "So very sorry, Catherine. Wish we had the power to do something besides watch." (As read) Now when she said that, what did -- what do you understand that she's saying there seeing as how she's a member of the Ottawa Police Services Board?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I took it as an indication from the councillor, who was also a member of the Police Services Board, that she was also frustrated with the police response into the occupation.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So when she says "wish we had the power to do something besides watch", did you understand her to be speaking about you and her essentially, the two of you?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No, I took it to mean -- the "we", I took it to mean we as my council colleagues, we as Police Services Board.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Councillor Fleury, if we go up, you say -- you respond to this exchange now and you say, "No police in ByWard Market, Rideau either." Do you recall that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I do.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And what does this -- does this email thread capture the sentiment from constituents about lack of police presence, or some people have talked about this morning feeling abandoned by authorities. What can you say to that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, absolutely. If you look at the date of this, I believe the red zone was smaller, and only encompassed sections west of the canal. And police were, at the time, describing their presence in the red zone. So they -- although we were sharing community concerns on the periphery of the red zone, the reports we were getting back from the Ottawa Police was few incidents in the red zone and presence in the red zone, which our focus was where we were hearing concerns, on the periphery. It's not a new issue in Ottawa. I want to be clear. Like, we have about 99 demonstrations a year. Every time there's a demonstration in Ottawa, local taxpayers of Ottawa lose their local police force to those demonstrations. That means neighbourhood officers that are in Centretown, in the ByWard Market, in Vanier are then focused on whatever is the demonstration. In this instance, that was the initial, but it grew into something much more significant because of no actions. There were incidents, vehicles driving on the sidewalk, police nearby not taking action. So it grew into a lot of questions from all of us, including residents and businesses on what -- are we in a state of chaos? Who's going to respond to elements that are happening that we wouldn't tolerate from just living in society or living in our city. And the -- not to lower the issues of the red zone, but the -- where we were pushing for more presence and support from community members was on the periphery of the red zone where folks were either living in the red zone, going to shop or getting out of the zone, and the number of incidents, or the opposite, coming into work, and there were incidents. I shared with you in one of our conversations the situation in the Rideau LRT. Rideau LRT is our biggest LRT station, largest volume in the city. Ottawa Police refused to go into the LRT Station. I had to get the head of OC Transpo to come and meet with us. She recognized the incidents; they see it on camera. There’s a bunch of CCTV cameras through our LRT network. They brought special constables in. She had to go herself and her leadership team in red vests to give a sense that there was safety in these stations because the Ottawa Police refused to go in.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And when you talk of the red zone, what is your understanding of the boundaries of that zone? What do you mean when you say “the red zone”?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
If you go back into official submission by the Ottawa Police, their Twitter accounts or their official communication in the City of Ottawa, they define the red zone. They basically took a map of both of our wards and would mark the red zone. It started off as being west of the canal and Albert -- north of Albert Slater towards Parliament. And it grew all the way to, I believe, Somerset in your area, and all the way to King Edward eastern part in mine.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So that would encompass residential zones? I just want to make sure that we’re not separating red zone from residential zones because it sounds like there were residential areas within the red zone as well.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
There is.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
If I could, at least from my perspective, it was Laurier and south of Laurier where we had no police presence, so I'm not entirely certain if at that point it was being referred to as a red zone. But it was north of Laurier where police resources were almost exclusively focused. And if I could just give one example, and you know, I work very well with our community police officer. She’s the head of our NRT, our Neighbourhood Response Team. She was my direct contact and one day I asked her if she would come with me to a building that had an attempted arson with doors taped. Residents were very frightened and she just reported back and said, “I’m sorry, but I’m being re-appointed to the convoy.” So I knew then that police felt their response to the convoy did not include residential areas.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. I want to take you to another email, OTT00005554. And its subject line is “Forward update re: trucks back on Metcalfe blocking two lanes as of this morning.” It’s dated February 8. And then if we go down to the original email -- yeah, there we go. The sender says: “They are quickly multiplying in numbers with cars now being added since I first saw them at 9:00 a.m.. Here are videos and footage from another neighbour.” And if we go down we see this photo. Are you able to, Councillor McKenney, based on the photo, give an indication of whereabouts it was taken?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes. This is at Metcalfe, just south of Laurier.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And if we go up to your Foreword, it says: “Trucks and vehicles taking over Metcalfe as I write a message to you.” And if we go up, I just want to see who you were sending this to. So you sent this to former Chief Sloly and copied Mayor Jim Watson, Member of Parliament Yasir Naqvi, Minister Mendocino, Councillor Fleury, and it looks like some other ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Colleagues.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
--- councillors, other councillors, yeah.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
M’hm.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Did you get a response from Former Chief Sloly on this email, do you recall?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t recall getting a response, no.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And can you confirm then that the footprint of the convoy in the residential areas, as this email seems to indicate, was expanding over time?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, certainly it was moving east, Metcalfe, O’Connor, and then south down Metcalfe O’Connor to -- you know, Lisgar probably was as far south on Metcalfe and O’Connor that it expanded to. But yes, it was starting to grow at that point. Again, more so on the weekends but people were very nervous when they -- seeing that, you know, this occupation was expanding onto the streets where they lived.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And you observed this kind of expansion yourself? It wasn’t just through people reporting this to you?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Oh no, I went down pretty much every day.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. And Councillor Fleury, in your ward did the area of the convoy grow over time or did it -- was it static over the course of the convoy?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It was certainly static in the Rideau Sussex node and along Rideau Street. I’d say east of King Edward towards the Loblaws, if you -- the Nelson and Rideau, it did change, I believe, on the third week. And the same thing along King Edward near the shelter when the incident happened. We saw that over time it was -- the parked rigs were getting closer to Rideau Street. So they had kind of doubled up on King Edward, instead of being on a long stretch along King Edward.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So they were concentrated more on ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Rideau.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
--- on Rideau. Oaky. So Councillor McKenney, I want to take you to some videos that you took while walking through the neighbourhoods. If we can go to OTT00030053. And if you can just describe to us what we’re seeing in this video.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes. This is Kent Street. It’s late at night. There are trucks idling, constant idling. And the reason for the video was to demonstrate the effect on people’s homes. They’re parked in the front steps of people’s homes essentially with, you know, emissions pouring directly into people’s bedroom windows.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And was this a kind of a one-off? You saw this and took a video? Or is this something that you were seeing constantly through your walks?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I saw this every night for the entire occupation at this area, in this area.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Councillor Fleury, did you notice idling as well in ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
I’m going to take you to a video that’s attached to an affidavit provided to us by the Coalition of Businesses and Residences. And it’s a COA00000112. (VIDEO PLAYBACK)
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And Councillor McKenney, it looks like that’s you that is depicted in the video. Can you confirm that?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it is.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And do you know who recorded you?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, Kiavash Najafi.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And it’s Mr. Najafi’s affidavit that this is attached to so that makes sense. And in the video it looks like you are taking a recording of a toilet, an outdoor toilet. Can you explain why you took that video? What was your concern there?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
So this was the Wednesday of the final -- the council meeting just before the occupation ended when I went down to Kent Street to record what I was seeing. I called into Council from Kent Street and what I was doing, just in order to demonstrate to my colleagues what was happening, and you know to show others what people were living under. And at this point this was at the beginning of the council meeting. We were still on Zoom so at the beginning of the council meeting it was only the people who were allowed in as panelists, so council, the clerk’s office, et cetera, staff, senior staff who could see what I was video taping. So normally the camera would be turned back at me and I would be sitting in my dining room. But I was down on Kent Street, turned the camera around. And while council was being introduced, rather than just sit there, I had the camera turned so that it would be evident to people in the council meeting what was happening on Kent St. that day.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And would that be the February 16 council meeting?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it was.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And I want to take you to an image that was also provided in the Najafi affidavit and it’s at COA00000129. Are you able to locate this area or indicate whereabouts this is?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, this is also on Kent, Kent at Nepean.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Kent and Nepean, thank you. And did you observe, personally, what’s being depicted in this image?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, I think I spoke to at least one of them on one occasion, one of the gentlemen here.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And can you describe what we’re seeing here?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, so this is Kent Street where the occupation took very strong root. And each block -- I learned this because I spoke to people as I travelled up and down Kent through the three weeks. Each block had a block captain. And, you know, there would be supplies brought in. There were often fires burning in barrels, trucks running. It was just an occupied street, I guess, is the best way to describe it. Yeah.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And what concerns did this raise in terms of health and safety or any other concerns aside from, obviously, they’re -- they don’t intend on leaving?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
M’hm. Well, certainly, as you can see, there are fires burning in the middle of our downtown street outside a residential area. There are -- you can’t see it in this photo but, you know, some of the video that I took shows, you know, jerry cans around with oil -- with gasoline. Often, in the middle of the night, there were fireworks. So everything combined just made for an exceptionally dangerous environment people feet away from their bedrooms, their kitchens, their children’s living area, schools in the downtown.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Councillor Fleury, in your ward, were there similar types of encampments or, I guess, similar to what we’re seeing here where there’s stockpiling of food, and wood, and fires?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Along Nicholas, right beside the University of Ottawa; Sussex and Rideau; and, at times, on George Street.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Now, Councillor McKenney, I understand that on February 15 you attended a counter-demonstration, as it’s called, in the Billings Bridge area; do you recall that?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, I do.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And what do you know about how this counter-demonstration came about or what the purpose of it was?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I started to hear from residents early that morning and one of -- a colleague, Jean Menard, who is the councillor for that area, that -- again, it was a weekend -- that vehicles were expected to enter, you know, into the city to join -- to join the occupation. There were two locations where they were expected, one was a more residential area in the Glebe, Fifth Avenue, and the other -- the other route was along Riverside at Billings Bridge. Through, you know, some communication, it was decided that people would go down and try to stop these vehicles from coming in and joining the occupation. It was decided that the residential area would be the location for this counter- demonstration. There was always a fear of violence affecting residents in their homes so it was decided it would occur on Riverside where there were no residents living.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And can you -- you were there at some point in the afternoon.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Is that right?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And what did you observe? What was happening while you were there?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, so by the time I arrived, there were hundreds of people there. There was a line of mostly trucks, pickup trucks, you know, with the flags that indicated they were sympathetic to the convoy lined up, stopped. And it was -- you know, certainly there was no threats of violence there. It was relatively peaceful. The general mood of the people in their vehicles is -- you know, I went up and down the street -- was one of, I think, a bit of surprise that residents, at least who were there, weren’t welcoming them into the city. But it just continued until about 4:30 when it started to get dark -- it was February -- and the decision was made just to allow each vehicle to leave one at a time if they, you know -- you know, if they would ensure that they would just leave and not go into the downtown, which they did. And they were asked to remove the flags from their vehicles.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And so how were these trucks being prevented from going into the downtown? Were people physically standing in the road? Was it cars ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
--- that were being parked? Maybe you can explain that.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No, sorry, it was people physically standing in front of each of the vehicles and not allowing them to move any further. And as it -- by the time I got there, there were enough people that, you know, it was just blocked. The street was completely filled with people surrounding each of the vehicles.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And I’m going to take you to a video that I’m hoping you can confirm whether it shows some of the events of that day, COM00000741. [VIDEO PLAYBACK]
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
These are just some images. So Councillor McKenney, can you confirm whether these images are of that counter-demonstration that you attended on the 15th of February?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, they are.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And we saw some police liaison team members there. What can you tell me about the police presence in that counter-demonstration?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, again, it was, as you can see, almost celebratory. It was peaceful. Police interacted mostly with residents. And, you know, it was a watershed moment, certainly, in terms of the overall occupation where it became very evident that residents were no longer going to just sit idly by, that they were going to take, you know, action where they felt that they could, and this is what you are seeing.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And what impact did this event have on the residents based on your interactions with them?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Well, that day it was very celebratory. I went down in the afternoon. I had been -- in the morning, I had gone down onto Kent and onto Wellington, walked around, visited residents who were feeling threatened down on McLeod at Bank. There had been an incident where doors of a multi-residential building had been handcuffed shut. So I’d been down into that area so I went later to Billings Bridge, so it was probably about 1:30 before I got there, two o’clock. By the time I got there, it was a celebratory mood, really.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Now, the Commission may receive some evidence that the counter-demonstration forced OPS to deploy resources away from the downtown to engage de- escalation at the counter-protest and that this did not assist OPS’s efforts to resolve the issue of the convoy. What would be your response to that?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
We needed OPS protect residents. This was residents’ only way to ensure that, you know, what was happening to our city was going to be recognized and responded to by OPS. You know, there were -- it was not a large of police, you know, present, so out of the hundreds of police officers up on Wellington, this would have been a small number.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. Thank you. So I want to speak a little bit now about the effects on the businesses, Councillor Fleury. If we can go to OPS document, OPS-00003441? If we go down to the January 26th original email. We'll go down a bit more to the first email in the chain. Yeah, let's just go down and make sure we got it. Yes. Okay. If we can keep going to the bottom? Okay. So that is the bottom, so now we'll go to the top of the email. So this is from -- if we can just see the from, ByWard Market BIA executive director, and it is directed at you on January 26th. So this is now before the convoy arrives. The subject matter is ByWard Market BIA concerns ahead of January 29, 2022 demonstration. And if we go down to the actual body of the email -- I'll just leave that there for a second to give you a chance to review it. It appears that the ByWard Market BIA executive director is raising a number of concerns. I'll just give you a second to read some of that.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So this email outlines several concerns regarding safety and security, regarding, you know, having more information about what to expect, suggesting that people may not be following public health restrictions. Was this one of the first emails that you received ahead of the convoy alerting you to the business's concerns with respect to the convoy?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I believe so. We had just received a city briefing. There was starting to be city communication and local media coverage of the risks. And as you can see, the BIA is both connected on what's happening at the city, but also with its own members and describing very early some of the incidents and concerns.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And so in the third paragraph, the last sentence says, "This, of course, in the context of coverage, detailing that there are some protesters suggesting and hoping that this weekend will be a Canadian equivalent of the American riots of January 6th, 2021." (As read) Were either of you aware of news coverage, these intentions by some of the protesters, or was this the first time that you had seen this suggestion? I'll ask Councillor Fleury first.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Until the convoy coverage started to come to our attention and until the city called a briefing, we received very little communication. But residents starting -- started to inform us. As you know, Ottawa does have the universities. We have active residents. We have informed businesses who were following it and were asking questions early. And if you -- I believe if you go back to the first briefing from the city and OPS, councillors and I, and Catherine certainly were asking very, you know, concerned questions around what will Ottawa Police, what will the City of Ottawa do to prevent risks for us residents and businesses in our area with few answers.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And, Councillor McKenney, had you heard any suggestion that some of the protestor's intentions ahead of the convoy was something similar to what's being described here?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, mostly through social media. You know, I -- as Councillor Fleury did, started to ask those questions. You know, we saw the messages coming out of, you know, the more western provinces leading up to January 28th, that week leading up, but, you know, every day just became a bit clearer as to the intentions. You know, at that point, we called them disruptions.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And if we go up a little bit, we're going to see that the email you then -- yeah, let's keep going. You forward that -- if we can go up? So you forwarded that on the same day, the 26th. It looks like to former Chief Sloly, Roger Chapman, who I believe is the By-law - - the head of the By-law and ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
That's right.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
--- Regulatory Services, Kim Ayotte, who is the head of the Emergency Management, and a few other people there in the City of Ottawa. And you say thank you to the constituents, and then you say, "Chief Sloly, Chapman and Ayotte, could you review the ByWard BIA concerns and connect with the BIA ED ahead of the weekend? I have cced Rideau BIA as well as GM of Rideau Centre who have similar concerns. How are we supporting local businesses through this demonstration from risk of ignorance to public health measures and pressures on a business they fear? Thanks for the prompt consideration, support and response." (As read) And if we go up, we can see that former Chief Sloly then forwards this to Deputy Chief Ferguson and says, "Trish, I got a message from Councillor Fleury wanting to follow up with you on this email and other related matters. He will contact you directly." (As read) And if we go to the very top -- oh, yeah, sorry about that. Yeah, Deputy Chief Ferguson says, "As a means of follow-up, this has been looked after." (As read) So did -- were you able to speak with Deputy Chief Ferguson about this matter?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I don't recall. I don't recall, to be honest. The information I received from police at the time was certainly very limited.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It was often, you know, they would receive the information we were providing, saying we have this information, we're onto it, but we wouldn't get -- I wasn't able from there to say open or close, or here are measures that Ottawa Police will put in place so that your businesses can operate. Here's a liaison that's being put in place, so that we can structure that. So you're going to see a lot of these communications where police says, oh, it's a short call, as if it's a resolution. Like, the feeling -- if you're an outsider, if you're just reading this, the feeling is, like, oh, there's a resolved matter. The resolved matter is ultimately the BIA or the executive director, they report back in to 600 members. So they need something in writing from the City of Ottawa or OPS at that point to share what should members know about, and how can they prevent, and what are their contacts if there are concerns. You can see by this communication that there was nothing in writing provided to myself or to the executive director of the ByWard BIA to bring response, to bring closure.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So then is it fair to say that the concerns that were raised by the BIA were not satisfactorily addressed in your interactions with Deputy Chief Ferguson?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Well, that's the Thursday. I believe that following Saturday, the Rideau Centre, Ottawa's largest commercial property, was closed at noon because it got out of control, and individual businesses were worried, and the mall security couldn't maintain safety of the operation. So they -- it took them four hours to close the Rideau Centre. That is a epicentre of a very large commercial property but a reflection of hundreds of businesses along Elgin, Bank Street, ByWard Market, Rideau Street and information that we were being asked by local business operators and their staff.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And on the subject of the Rideau Centre, I understand they were closed approximately 25 days straight. Is that your understanding as well?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Twenty-four (24) days.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Twenty-four (24) days. Thank you. And is that unusual?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
If you've been in Ottawa, or if you live in Ottawa, the Rideau Centre is closed one day a year and that's barely, because they're connected to the LRT station. They play an important function in the transit routes, the connection between the residents, the commercial district, the University of Ottawa, some of the nearby amenities, like, City Hall, for example. So the Rideau Centre being closed is an anomaly. Being closed for one day a year is kind of their standard. So you could see the pressure. And, you know, the general manager of the Rideau Centre was in daily contact with myself. The owner of the Rideau Centre, Cadillac Fairview, did meet with us, did meet with authorities at the City, including the mayor's office, to share concerns and try to find solutions in that first week.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And do you have a sense for why it had to close on that first day? Was it because of safety concerns? Was it because there were too many people? Was it -- what was the concern there?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Microaggressions. I don't know that I'm describing the term appropriately, but, you know, people walking in stores with -- and stripping masks. People questioning why people were wearing masks, large gatherings in the food court. At the time, you could pick up food. You couldn't stay in the food court. The food court wasn't able to be cleared. The security had requested that those who were there to leave, and they weren't leaving. Kind of the closest, warmest spot with public washrooms and, you know, a great commercial offering, I can understand the attraction, but that was kind of the -- all of the microaggressions in one instance was that on that Saturday at noon.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. Now, Councillor Fleury, I understand that you organized daily meetings with affected Business Improvement Areas, hotel associations, affected stakeholders. Do you know when these meetings -- when did you start having these meetings?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
The first week. So Ottawa has unfortunately -- I’ve been on the council table for the last 12 years. We’ve had a lot of crises. I’ve had to live the Rideau sinkhole, which would have impacted a very similar range of businesses in my area. We’ve had to live, obviously, the covid impacts and how we were informing businesses. So we struck a business leader group, which included the Business Improvement Associations for Vanier, ByWard, Rideau, Ottawa Markets. Based on strong collaboration with my colleague, we included Spark Street, Bank Street, some of the association members, so the hotel association, you know there’s a number of large hotels in both of our wards, and the tourism partners. I might be forgetting a stakeholder or two, but that’s -- from the external point of view, that was that. And then we had, at those meetings, invited all elected members that were in I’ll call it the Federal Riding of Ottawa Center and Ottawa Vanier. So you have the local councillor invited, you had the provincial MP and MPP and their respective representatives. And at different times, we had provincial minister staff, from Minister MacLeod at the time and other Minister offices, as well as same thing federally for different -- I don’t recall the specifics. I’d have to go back to my note, but they were also attendees. And at the City, we had a broad range of representation from Traffic Operations, Emergency Services, Bylaw Services, we had OC Transpo, as I described earlier in the session, Ottawa Police, and at times, Communications and Economic Development.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Now, in your interview summary, you stated that the Mayor, the City Manager, and the Chief of Police did not personally attend the meetings with the BIA. Were they invited to attend?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I believe they were. They organized two early meetings and then I started to organize a daily meeting, which they were invited to and were not attending.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Do you have an explanation from them as to why they didn’t attend? They never gave one to you?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
You’ll have to ask them. I think they’re ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
--- coming in to these.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
But they didn’t give you an explanation?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And did local businesses and BIAs express that they were content with the information they were receiving from the City?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No. We were often repeated the same public information that was available earlier in the day. There were some very specific questions, “How can I make sure that food can enter the zone so that my deliveries can continue?” “Can I -- how can I accommodate that --” for example, we know during the covid period, the Uber pick ups and the food distributions were very important. They couldn’t -- those vehicles couldn’t access the zone. So there’s a number of business issues that came to that table, and ultimately it’s, “Hey, City AOPS, what’s the plan? Should we be worried? Are you, you know --” and then, “Oh, these amounts of businesses are closed. What can we do about them?” It became complex, right, because you had employees of those businesses, you had to pay rent, then couldn’t pay rent, so then another set of conversation was there, like the group that represents the BIA were at the table as well. Then we hit a period between, obviously, January and February, where you have to -- those landlords need their pay, so those commercial businesses had to negotiate with their landlords. So that was another set of conversations. So there wasn’t one conversation theme. It was all about how do we get back to operating? How can we get back to operate safely in the area? It is an important time for us at the city. I think that’s the other measure that’s maybe not understood, is those weekends, late January, early February, are the Winterlude, is when we celebrate the winter activities, and there’s thousands of residents who come to the downtown, and visitors who come to skate on the Canal, to enjoy what we have to offer as a winter capital city. And those businesses were at -- there was restriction loosening at that point. So they were also hoping -- they had prepared -- they had purchased food, they had prepared their staff for larger gatherings. None related to the convoy, just preparing to the period. And yet often had to return them home. So there’s a number of -- Rideau Centre shared with us, and that was covered in the news, there are 3,000 employees at the Rideau Centre. Most of them are part time staff. And, you know, like the Apple Store, it’s 200 staff at the Apple Store. You have food, food court, and chefs, and you have cleaners, you have security. So that -- you know, it’s not just closing a commercial property. It’s all the family ramification of can that employee who is not working, not making -- not able to pay rent, can they negotiate? And what’s the pressure on that? So its impact is not geographic -- not simply a geographic one. It’s all the ripple of having a massive impact on the local economy in the city’s core.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And you mention that at these meetings, that businesses were getting the public information that general public was receiving. Is that unusual?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah. I’ve gone through a lot of crises, unfortunately, as I’ve described earlier. Usually very important information is provided at a white table from the City and other media authorities for what all residents need to know in terms of what would impact them, and then there are stakeholder information. “Can I get -- is transit going to operate? Can I get my distributers in? Is it safe to walk on the streets?” Those are the types of basic information that our business members were trying to get from the City. And we were creating that area, that daily space, with few interactions. And we kind of saw a number of situations where the City is there, the City is adapting, it’s closing streets, it’s removing, you know, some of the parking areas. It’s adapted. Do you remember in part of it, like, there’s a closure of bridges. So the City, from an operation point of view, is adapting. Bylaw, not so much so. Not because of their own doing, but because they fit into this command centre, you know, police operations, who call the shots on what can be enforced and not. And through that, there’s a number of concerns. How are we communicating to the members? How are we communicating the public? What’s the risk to residents? I know that one of the documents you have is around a pick-up truck with gas in the Rideau Centre parking lot. I can assure you today, if a pick-up truck showed up with gas, they would evacuate -- police would evacuate, police and fire, and all the authorities would show up, they’d evacuate the mall. In that situation, they’d remove the vehicle extremely quickly. They’d protect the public safety, and after that, they would remove the situation. No response to that. I mean, you have a pretty extensive thread by the General Manager at the Rideau Centre and what I’ll call confusion amongst authorities, and ultimately very fortunate that the Rideau Centre was able to support the -- find the operator and get them out of the situation. I mean, that’s the type of uncoordinated approach at a very microlevel that we weren’t able to get clarity to local businesses. And hence, I mean, you’d think about all of the residential properties and what it takes for people to go in and out of their properties, to access transit, to get their vehicles out. So it was chaos for both Catherine and I, not just on the business and the operations of that, but on the residents’ concerns. And we had little information or little hope of a plan that was going to be enacted to bring back safety and well being for residents in our city’s core.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So the City officials and police representatives that were at these meetings, were they able to give the type of specific information that businesses were looking for, such as what you described? Or generally no?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No. And if you see there are a number of times following those meetings where I provide -- I respond to the authorities and ask for clear, “Please follow up on this. Please follow up on that.” And at times, there’s also the business membership who is writing in to get clarification or get action. I believe there’s one, for example, at the Château Laurier, where there was a sprinkler issue and Fire couldn’t get -- apparently Fire tried to go down Rideau Street, as if it didn’t know that there was rigs on Rideau Street. Like, that’s the -- you know, we’re very fortunate that no more serious kind of life incident in those particular situations happened, because having the manager of the Château Laurier share that with their member association and for the member association to say, “What’s going on in City operations? How come you can’t respond effectively to -- you know, if there’s a paramedic call, how does the paramedic get to some of those residential buildings or some of the commercial --” I -- you know, we were all very frightened on our ability to respond at the level that residents would expect.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And to your knowledge, did the City ever ask local bias to restrict material and financial support to the demonstrators, would not sell them certain items or anything like that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I haven’t thought about that.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I’d have to think about it.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay, maybe you can think about that and ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
--- then get back to me at the end. Okay, so for -- in the interests of time, because I know -- I’m sure a lot of the parties have questions as well - - I’m going to -- we’re going to just move on to the City’s response and your experiences as councillors.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Une repose de cinq minutes, aller au toilette?
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay, I think the witnesses would like a moment so we’re going to take five minutes. I’m going to be a bit of a dictator so they’re going to be short. This is five minutes, not 15, so five-minute break. Merci.
Upon recessing at 3:41 p.m.
Upon resuming at 3:46 p.m.
COUNCILLOR CATHERINE McKENNEY, Resumed
COUNCILLOR MATHIEU FLEURY, Resumed
EXAMINATION IN-CHIEF BY MS. NATALIA RODRIGUEZ(cont’d)
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Welcome back, councillors. I just wanted to ask a question with respect to the emergency lanes. We have heard that the City and OPS attempted to maintain an emergency lane at all times to allow for emergency vehicles to go through ambulances and fire. Councillor Fleury, you also mentioned an incident at the Chateau Laurier where fire or first responders were not able to get to the Chateau Laurier. So I’m just trying to understand, to what extent were emergency lanes maintained open? Was this on every street? Was this on some streets? Maybe you can describe a little bit about what you saw with respect to maintaining an open lane. And I’ll start with Councillor Fleury.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Thinking about the Byward Market, the Byward Market has a minimum access points, if you will, and crossing Rideau at either King Edward or Dalhousie and entering those corridors through that north to south movement is vital. I can’t speak, you know, particular situations where that wouldn’t have been possible but, based on the videos, based on what I saw when I was on the ground, you know, I’m not sure that emergency vehicles were being -- if other vehicles were moving out of the way for emergency vehicles. I did see videos of different emergency vehicles at times throughout the three weeks trying to get to different areas of our zones. I’m not familiar with what was -- why was the call or why was the vehicle in that space but we did see how -- there was some social media video about how challenging and delayed the operations were. I can’t speak to a particular incident or location, but by -- you could see how clogged the streets were and how that occupation took hold, how challenging it could be, but I don’t have an eye on -- in terms of, were all of the paramedics and fire aware of routes and corridors and how they could get to each property? I don’t know the specifics of that.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
But in terms of streets in the Byward Market, for example, did all of them have one lane of traffic open to them or no? Were there streets that were completely cut-off kind of on either end where any kind of vehicles couldn’t enter?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Properties that were on Rideau, properties that were on George, properties that were on Sussex, McKenzie Avenue, the Nicholas/Daly area were extremely difficult to get into by motor vehicle.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And Councillor McKenney, what can you tell us about the maintenance of an emergency lane in the kind of downtown core?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
M’hm. Well, certainly, there was never a lane open on Kent Street. There was -- Bank Street would have the lane open maybe as far as Lisgar but on the weekend, certainly, you could not get past Lisgar going north. And the same with Metcalfe and O’Connor, on the weekends, often they were completely blocked. But Kent in particular, you could never get any emergency vehicle down.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So were there some streets for which and emergency lane was maintained throughout, do you know?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t have that specific information, no.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. Councillor Fleury, in your interview with the Commission, you spoke about problem that you perceived with the City’s bylaw enforcement and their response to resident complaints. Can you speak a little bit more to that issue? What were the issues, specifically, that you were concerned about?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I apologize. You were asking an earlier question and I just want wrap and idea that maybe ---
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yes.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
--- was not raised which is, in Ottawa, the proximity between Ottawa and Gatineau and the economic drivers of both sides do have an impact, and we do -- we were informed of a long-term care -- we were informed of some of the hospitals who were quite concerned around the ability for shift staff to get to the facility and provide operations. I think of Bruyère, for example, in the Byward Market. I think of some of the long-terms cares that are City operated or privately operated. I think of Montfort Hospital, particularly. So getting in and out of the area -- and unfortunately, many of our interprovincial bridges were in this red zone catchment. So, if you look at cameras of that time, there was massive backlogs because of either street closure or the rigs on King Edward, specifically. So fluidity and getting emergency -- it’s not just the emergency vehicle, it’s actually the workforce into those health contexts was raised by those institutions.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And so with respect to your concerns about the City of Ottawa’s Bylaw response complaints, what can you tell me about that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Bylaw is an automatic mechanism in the City and sometimes it kind of slings back at them. But you call 311 if there’s a violation, someone is parked on the street illegally or -- we have -- in the Byward Market, Bylaw goes proactively and tickets. If you didn’t pay for parking or if you’re not parked properly, they’ll tow you. So, in regular operations, Bylaw is on the ground on parking. It's respect -- ensuring that some of those rules -- and in more complex situations where, you know, if there is noise, if there is a fire, then different authorities in and around Bylaw, like Fire Services or others, will come and intervene. We, as councillors, don’t intervene in that. It’s an automatic process through 311 and when there are incidents, or if there’s lack of follow up, then often the resident would inform us and then we would convey that or connect with the police -- with the fire chief -- sorry, the Bylaw chief and their team and they would follow up accordingly with the resident without political influence. It’s important for us to inform, connect, but very -- you know, we know were are authorities are. They’re through motions of council, not influencing operations in that regard. And what was frustrating is the amount of parking in illegal lots, or even in the Byward Market, and vehicles that were abandoned, or vehicles that were improperly parked, and we’d convey that through to the authorities and it was this chain of command. Instead of going through a 311 and Bylaw goes out and responds, it was the 311 call is referred to police in the command centre and if the command centre judges that that is an applicable element, then they would share with Bylaw. But the problem is they didn’t. They were so focused on the red zone or the elements of the red zone that even basic Bylaw services that we would expect were not enforced, which compounded a lot of the tension point, and so much so that we came to realize that there was a trend. If you call 3-1-1 and there was an illegal parker, the operator would say, “Okay. Can you describe the vehicle?” Oh, there’s a flag. And then it was already Police Command. Even if we were outside of the red zone, like we’re talking, you know, blocks and blocks away. There wasn’t proper enforcement because of the way the system had shifted to Emergency Operation, and shifted under Police Command.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So then when the resident would call 3-1-1 they would be asked to describe the vehicle in order -- what was your understanding for why they had to describe the vehicle?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I never heard that. Yeah, I never heard that until the occupation.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And so is your understanding then that was in order to determine whether it was a vehicle associated with the convoy? Was that the purpose of kind of giving the description?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It’s the feeling that it gives me.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yeah.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
But it doesn't make the illegal parker legitimate from my perspective, and it creates this -- we’re here representing residents and businesses in our area. And if rules don’t apply -- like, rules don’t just apply. We’re often told, you know, by councillors, “There’s not a good business or a bad business. There is a licence, and if the licence allows them to operate it, they operate.” Well, it’s the same thing with our rules. They should apply to every resident, not because they’re -- the vehicle is a particular size or colour or there’s a particular element. So that compounded a lot of the issues that we were facing at regular enforcement on the parameter -- Cumberland Street being one, Wilbrod, in the Lowertown area -- were just not enforced.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And do you have any knowledge as to whether Bylaw was choosing then not to engage, or whether this was Ottawa Police telling Bylaw not to engage? Do you have any knowledge of that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
You probably refer to a number of interactions that I would have had with the Manager of Bylaw, Jen Therkleson, or the Chief Roger, or Kim Ayotte, where I was trying to get -- “Hey, what’s happening? Why aren’t we enforcing these?” And then eventually it came to be a description that, “No, this is under Police Command. We require that Police Command Centre to give us authority to go in and do it. “There are other considerations prior to our enforcement,” is the gist of what I was described.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And that would have been those three individuals who told you that, the three people you named?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah. I mean, they were pretty aligned and consistent in that this is a police operation. We rely on their comfort for us to enforce our bylaws.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And that was regardless of where in the city this was taking place? Like, I imagine at some point you're far enough away from the main site that Bylaw is doing its regular work, say, in Kanata, Orleans, and Barrhaven. How far was this extending? Do you have any sense of that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t, but specifically for my ward, we have a Bikers Church which was sympathetic to the occupation, and there were a lot of illegal parking situations. We’re talking, like, on the other side of the Rideau River. So if you want to bring back the map, it’s quite -- it’s a number of blocks, probably maybe two kilometres away from the red zone. You're into the old City of Vanier. And there’s no enforcement for parking violations. That’s kind of the -- I don’t know how far that went into the city. I can only speak to the information I had from community associations and residents about this loop; this loop of I’m calling in, they’re asking me to describe the vehicle. Obviously the resident is emotional, saying, “Yeah, there’s ‘X Trudeau’ or there’s a flag or there’s a pickup truck or whatever.” And then oh, yeah, they took my complaint but there’s no actions. It’s been two days, three days, sometimes a week. And that really -- we recognized the -- as councillors we recognized kind of -- we don’t have authority over police enforcement. But on the City of Ottawa side we’re responsible for the safety and wellbeing of residents and we do have bylaws and other tools that in this situation I still don’t understand why they got caught in the Police Command outside of the red zone. I can respect the red zone. You know, there might be tactical reasons or safety reasons. But I really don’t understand that, and to this day I still don’t have a City explanation that I can convey to a resident about that situation.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Councillor McKenney, do you have any sense about the bylaw’s kind of structure and when it was being enforced and when it wasn’t?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Only what I was able to observe, obviously, within the core of the downtown. Bylaw was not handing out tickets to, you know, large trucks. As you went west, you know, by the time you got onto the other side of the Trillium Line tracks, you know, we were starting to get complaints that parents parked outside schools were getting tickets. So they were ticketing in some instances, certainly outside of the ward that I represent. But you know, I don’t have any examples of calling Bylaw. I didn’t call Bylaw to come and ticket large trucks. I don’t think anyone did. But you know, as we moved west, a certain bylaw was active.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And I'm going to take you both to a letter that you co-authored on February 2nd, and it’s at OTT00014570. And this is -- Councillor McKenney, you sent this on February 2nd to Mayor Watson, Former Chief Sloly, Councillors, members of the OPSB. And I just want to go down to the signature line just to show that it looks like you both signed off on that. Do you see that there?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And we’re just going to go back up. So it says: “Mayor Watson and Chief Sloly, Ottawa’s urban core is in crisis, for six days and nights downtown residents have been under siege. They have faced unprecedented noise and pollution. Wearing a mask in public means being threatened with violence and sexual violence, of being spat at and screamed at.” And then you on to describe the horns keeping people awake, drivers threatening pedestrians, open fires, tanks of fuel being delivered to vehicles, illegal parking, downtown gridlock. And you're being told that more trucks may arrive this weekend to reinforce the convoy’s numbers. And then you say: “Therefore, we ask you, Chief Sloly, have you requested that the RCMP assume full operational control of Parliament Hill and the Parliamentary Precinct so that OPS can be deployed into the neighbourhoods to restore peace? “Mayor Watson, have you spoken to the Prime Minister, and what assistance did the Prime Minister offer? Have you requested that the federal government take control of what is happening in our city?” And you finish of with a plea. And do you recall authoring this letter and sending it to those people?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, I do.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And did you receive a formal response to this letter from either the Chief or the Mayor?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And what you describe in the letter -- if we can go up a little bit; in terms of the open fires, tanks of fuels, blasting horns every day, drivers threatening pedestrians, et cetera -- was this based on circumstances that you yourselves witnessed or that were reported to you or a combination?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Combination.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Combination.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
We’re a married couple.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
I’m going to start calling you “McFleury” from now on. And do you stand by the contents of this letter today?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay, thank you. Councillor Fleury, at one point you asked the City to look into imposing a curfew; is that correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Can you explain a little bit where this idea came from and what happened, what came from it, if anything?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
So there’s a number of information we were -- as you know, I represent the University of Ottawa. There’s a lot of to-be lawyers that are at the University of Ottawa, very very smart residents who have ideas who along the way we convey, you happen to pick, to choose one of them. We were trying to find a way to see a plan, an enforcement, so that we could get back to the safety and wellbeing for residents and businesses. For us there were a number of instances. You talk about the curfew. We have the Police Chief who tells us, “Well, there’s no more canister movement.” And then that continues. And then all of a sudden we get the pressure from residents in the city saying, “What’s happening? Like, why aren’t rules being followed?” So I know you want me to address that particular point. I guess my point is there was a number of these ideas that were shared with us that we passed along and either through formal motions of Council when I moved to asked the Chief Justice to change the bylaw fines for an increase, or the curfew examples are there as well. So I don’t recall the specific reason behind the curfew but it does fit the range of criterias that we were asking for information. And junction was another one that we asked the City's legal team to look at, and as you know, came really late and really slow.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So you don't recall what happened to the idea of imposing a curfew specifically?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And, Councillor McKenney, in this -- in the letter we saw a minute ago and also in a motion that you -- that was eventually brought, you had asked to formally petition the Government of Canada to assume responsibility for public safety and security within the parliamentary precinct in order to allow for Ottawa police officers to patrol neighbourhoods and be in charge of the neighbourhoods. And that was then a motion that was eventually brought to council. What was the purpose of this motion?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
So it was quite evident that the local police force was solely focused on Wellington Street and the surrounding parliamentary precinct. And when I say parliamentary precinct in this case, I'm including Wellington, although I know it's not formally part of the precinct. So it was very clear that, you know, our local police force was focused on what was essentially a federal protest, federal occupation. So I was doing everything I could to appeal to our federal government, our federal partners to assume responsibility for what was happening, and, you know, about, you know, getting any reaction. I ended up bringing a motion to Council, asking for the mayor to appeal on behalf of the City.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And did that -- that motion passed?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I believe so, but ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I think it carried, yeah.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I think it carried.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And did it have the intended effect?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No, it did not.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And do you know why not?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
You know, I mean, nobody ever really followed up with me as the local councillor, so I can't tell you specifically. But nothing ever came of it. The assumption of -- or the addition of police -- extra police resources didn't happen until much later, of course.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So I'm going to take you to a Ottawa document, OTT-00005837. And so this is an email dated February 8th, and it is from former Chief Sloly to Jim Watson, Mayor Watson, and Councillor Deans and copying Ottawa Police and City officials. And it says, "Dear Mayor Watson and Chair Deans, I am writing further to yesterday's special council meeting wherein the motion of Councillor McKenney regarding the parliamentary precinct was passed by City Council." (As read) So this would be the motion that we were just discussing?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And then he goes on to say, "In Ontario, policing is governed by the Police Services Act in accordance with Section 5(1)(1) of the Police Services Act. The City of Ottawa has discharged its responsibility to provide police services by establishing a police force, the Ottawa Police Service. As a result, the Ottawa Police Service is the sole police service of jurisdiction. It is important to note that the Police Services Act defines police force as either the Ontario Provincial Police or a municipal police force. The Ottawa Police Service maintains that Councillor McKenney's motion is absent jurisdictional authority where it intends for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to assume command of the response to the ongoing demonstration in the City of Ottawa." (As read) And he goes on from there. Were you made aware of former Chief Sloly's response to this motion the day following the motion?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Not that I recall, no.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And then in the kind of second to last paragraph, he says, "Although any deployment of officers will be under the direction of the Chief of Police as an operational consideration, the Ottawa Police Service will make every attempt to meet the spirit of the motion and have Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers work in and around the hardened area of the demonstration." (As read) Did -- to your knowledge, did that attempting to meet the spirit of the motion, did that have the intended affect that you were hoping the motion would have?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
It did not.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. Now I'm going to pose some kind of more general questions to both of you about generally the response to the events and authority's response. Specifically, we'll start with City Council. How would you, Councillor Fleury, describe City Council's response to the events in Ottawa, the events of the protest?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Too slow. Too slow and obviously, we're ward based, we're elected ward base, and only a few -- we're a big territory in Ottawa. You have to understand we're the size of Montreal, Toronto, Edmonton, Calgary and Vancouver in one city with one million in population. So our suburban colleagues or even within the greenbelt, they weren't directly impacted. And as you know, outside of this Commission, there's big divides on this current City Council. So it certainly -- it was -- in a crisis time, it was hard to bring us all together. I think eventually we got there, but it took way too long for Council to even get, okay, this is happening, this is serious. They're not moving. They're not going to get out. We have to be organized. We have to be intentional. And you could sort of see it by the frequency of the meetings, and also, the motions that were starting to pass. But if you go back to that first council after the beginning of what was at the time protest which became operation, our own colleagues refused to delay agenda items that were very significant, non-related to this on planning matters, on other matters, just to show you that we were living a crisis. We were getting flooded with the emails, and yet it took, like, a lot of time for our colleagues to wake up to the seriousness of the issue and the impact on us as a city, not just the -- a neighbourhood and not just the capital precinct components of it.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Councillor McKenney?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Well, there wasn't much in terms of jurisdiction that City Council could do. Certainly, this was, you know, under the jurisdiction of police. This was a police matter. It was a public safety issue. You know, outside of, you know, delaying committee meetings to allow myself, my colleague Councillor Fleury to focus on what was happening, calling on, you know, police or even writing to the federal government, asking the mayor to write to the federal government to, you know, ask for help, there really wasn't a lot that a City Council in itself could do to end this or to respond in any significant way.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Usually we agree, but I do want to kind of share my piece, which is following all of this, I've submitted a number of inquiries to Council, to the Police Services Board. I believe this was shared to this inquiry as well.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Yes.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
When was this illegal? And I keep getting a non-answer from different authorities. When was this declared illegal? When -- we are politicians. We're elected to represent our residents. You know, when did it go from a protest to an occupation to a siege? I've asked clearly those questions a number of time, and in a weird kind of way, it says, oh, well, it's when the mayor declared a state of emergency. Well, the same day the mayor declares a state of emergency tells everyone there's no impact of that. It's symbolic. But then everything unfolded around the declaration of a state of emergency. Well, if that's the case, then, yeah, council didn't wake up. He declared a state of emergency -- I don't have a date, but I think it's February 6th.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
That's right.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
We were living that since January. Like, that's many days later. I mean, you wake up a Monday morning and there's no plan. We're told, oh, by Wednesday they'll be gone. Wednesday night or Thursday morning when they're not gone, what happens then? It's a lot of days later.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So but Council is not the one who declares a state of emergency. That's ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I understand.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
--- the mayor; right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I understand. But Council can move a motion to ask the mayor to declare a state of emergency. There's a number of pressure points that Council can enact. As you've seen, I described the by-law, for example, right, the increase in fines. Well, we can't increase fines, but we can ask the justice to increase fines. And, you know, if Council's behind it and we explain it, there's a number of areas like that that Council wasn't quick, it wasn't aligned on its intentions, which I think didn't do -- we didn't have the full tools to resolve this, but there's tools we could have used earlier that would have signalized the urgency of the situation.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And there never was a motion brought with respect to declaring a state of emergency; was there?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
The mayor declared it, but he knew that we had a council two days after and I had drafted that motion.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So it was coming, is what you’re saying?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It was coming to the floor of council and it’s a good that he didn’t wait for two days, but it should have came earlier.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. And there were several motions we know that were brought to Council, many of them which passed, relating to responses to the Convoy petitioning the federal government, asking the government for assistance for residents and businesses, for example. How would you describe generally the various motions that were brought to Council and that were passed? Like we know there’s different types of motions; some of them are more political in nature and are more symbolic, other ones actually have an effect where they can make a change. So what kinds of motions were these? Councillor McKenney?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, so the motions that had started to come forward certainly were, you know, of the nature, if you will -- you know, asking for a more coordinated response, asking, you know -- but I will say this, and again, it’s not necessarily Council, but you know, where the City did fail residents was in not -- you know, we have a Legal Department, we have expertise on staff and, you know, it took a private resident to, you know, come forward with an injunction to stop the horns. You know, that’s where in my opinion the City failed in its responsibility to residents. The declaration of an emergency was just that; it was symbolic. Nothing occurred as a result of that; horns didn’t stop; trucks didn’t stop idling, you know, the harassment didn’t stop, nothing stopped, if that’s all that had happened. Yeah, it had no effect essentially. So when the motion started to come forward, you know, my opinion, and it’s just my opinion, like some of it was, you know, to demonstrate that we’re, you know, as a Council or different councillors trying to do something to move it forward. It became desperate really. It was, you know, grappling at straws really to find a way as a city to bring to an end what was a federal crisis.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And my understanding too, is that there was an amendment to the idling by-law which then made it a breach of the by-law, if you will, to idle below a certain temperature. And that was because in the winter, if it’s below a certain temperature, you can idle, but of course this was being used -- or this was not being implemented because the trucks were out there idling and so they raised the temperature –- or rather they lowered the temperature such that it would apply even in cold weather. Have I accurately captured the spirit of that motion to amend the by-law?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And did that have an effect -- did passing that motion and amending that by-law to make it applicable in cold weather, have any practical effect?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And why is that?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Well, again, it wasn’t an injunction. There was, you know, I think that -- you could see from the evidence that trucks continued to idle; people, you know, who were occupying those streets, it was February, it was extremely cold and trucks -- large trucks, vehicles, in some cases cars just continued to idle.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Councillor Fleury, do you have any information as to why that didn’t do very much?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I go back to the by- law enforcement. It was by-law authorized to enforce and how many tickets were issued? We’re under the same mindset that we were not informed that there was a slew of fines and that that -- you know, that wasn’t a tool that was used by enforcement authorities to start to advance our -- the dismantling of the occupation.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And at some point I understand there was a suggestion that there were enough votes in Council to pass a motion to request military equipment under the National Defence Act. Councillor Fleury, can you explain what that was all about and what came of that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I think the context of that is very important. So we have a former military member who is a member of Council who’s fought in Afghanistan and the conversation relating to that in its period is two-prong. One is, we have Chief Sloly who is now at that point officially requesting additional resources from the OPP and the RCMP. And we have our City and OPS saying that tow trucks are refusing -- that tow trucks under contract are refusing to offer service and we can’t procure more; we’ve asked provincial partners, they’re not coming with solutions. So I know it’s controversial because of, you know, the use of the Emergencies Act and you going back a generation on the use of that Act, but the spirit of that conversation is relating to equipment to remove the trucks, so the towing equipment, not the military. It’s the equipment of the military to enable dismantling of the occupation.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So if I understand it, the City of Ottawa tow truck companies that were under contract with the City of Ottawa, were refusing to tow and offer towing services and this was a way to fill that gap; is that right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. And what happened to that motion?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t believe it was ever brought because it got entangled into the federal politics of that and I believe the Prime Minister and others commented that there would be no use of that Act, but it lost sense of why the conversation was happening at the local level, I’d say.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
I see. So it never made it to the floor?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay. So in your view, both of you, was there more Council could have done? And I’ll start with Councillor McKenney?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Well, certainly as I indicated earlier; to have an engaged Council and staff looking at all options, which included in the end injunctions, injunctions, you know, on horns, injunctions on idling, but with strength. Certainly that would have, at the very least, eased some of the stressors, the pressures that residents were, you know, under throughout this -- throughout the siege. You know, in the end I still pen that it was our local police who, you know, in the beginning made a -- you know, a serious error in allowing trucks to come into our City off of routes. Actually I think they put up signs and actually, you know, pointed to where they could park and that. And then, you know, our federal government, our provincial government, not responding in a way that in any way suggested that they, you know, felt that having their capital under siege, or losing their capital. Really, we had a residential neighbourhood that was lost, that was under siege and no other level of government was taking it seriously. And until that happened, you know, we weren’t going to see an end to the occupation. And it really was about the resources in the end. It really was about what I called for early in the occupation. We need to have those extra resources brought in, you know, local police were not going to be able to respond once the occupation took route.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Councillor Fleury, was there more that City Council could have done?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I support the idea of an earlier injunction. It’s pretty obvious now. The state of emergency, although symbolic, was used by provincial and federal elected officials to advance dismantling or solutions to dismantle our by-laws. It took a while for us to raise the fines -- and not just raising the fines, but actually untangling the command of the by-laws and make -- you know, start eating away at the red zone and start limiting the impact in the residential and main streets of Ottawa. The way the city communicated with residents, I think there was also a lot of concerns around, you know, call 311, but then if 311 is not -- if it doesn’t work, then what happens? So, you know, I think there’s a lot of this. And I want to come back to one of the points, which was on the -- I believe it was the Wednesday or the Thursday prior to the convoy arrival -- it was the 26th of January; we were briefed by Chief Sloly at the time Kim Ayotte and a number of councillors, I believe, including Councillor McKenney, Councillor Brockington and Councillor Egli, who’s a lawyer by profession, we asked “Will our truck routes be respected?” and we were said -- we were told no because of a charter I won’t recite because I’m not a lawyer. But then, for us, from an outside perspective, hey, the following weekend, they’re at Queen’s Park, they’re in Quebec City, and wait a minute, the trucks are controlled. They’re not walking right into the front doors. And adding to that, we’re weeks into that, days into that, trucks are moving in and out of the zone, moving. It’s like, “Whoa.” It’s like a triple effect of this. Like, we didn’t -- there wasn’t a plan in place to limit truck movement. Then truck movement continued and there was no operational resolution to that like, “Okay, you can’t move in the red zone. You’re out of the red zone. We’re not letting you back in.” That took until basically the last days before that was taken seriously.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So you’re saying that before the days -- that during the first few weeks, anyway, trucks could leave the red zone and then re-enter?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
In you views, I want to ask you about the mayor’s response to this. Councillor McKenney, do you think there was more the mayor could have done, or how would describe his response to this event?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Well, certainly his response to me, as the councillor, you know, responsible for the residents for the downtown, of Somerset ward, I never received a phone call from the mayor. It wasn’t until somebody mentioned it publicly that a meeting was called, myself, and several councillors, and the police chief, and the mayor. So, you know, there was no attempt to work with me to provide guidance, to provide resources, support for, you know, residents. It’s not about me personally. I didn’t need any of that but the people I represent certainly did. You know, there was no urgency from the mayor to respond, to provide the information that people needed, to respond to the concerns that were, you know -- you know, that were being brought to his attention and that of many others. I forwarded, in the end, many, many emails and instances of, you know, chaos in the -- you know, in the residential areas. So yeah, it was very difficult. It felt like, you know, for myself, that I was on my own to respond to what was happening in Centretown.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Councillor Fleury, with respect to the mayor’s response, what would you say to that? NA
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It’s easy when you look back, you can judge. And I know he’ll be on so, you know, you can ask him the specifics. But I think I’m going to bring it up to kind of the conversation that it needs to have which is, you know, the mayor represents every resident of Ottawa. And when there is an area that is impacted, you want to work with closely with the mayor, and legal team, and so on so that everyone’s on board with the actions, right. So I bring you back to that period. You know, I’m the only councillor, basically, at City Hall. I can’t work from home; I’m at City Hall; I’m in my office. That entire building’s empty. Like, it’s empty. So, you know, there’s the factor of where councillors live, where the mayor lives, where City staff live. They’re seeing it on their screen. They’re seeing it on social media. They’re not living it. So I’m not casting a blame. I’m describing the period, right. There’s a period of time where people are behind their screen at home. We’re living the impacts in real time and it happen extremely quick. And then, you know, there’s the other piece, which is the period -- like, the crisis. At the City -- again, I go back -- I mean I’m young but getting old. Twelve years later, we’ve had a lot of crises 00 flooding, power outages, a recent derecho, the sinkhole on Rideau. It’s pretty standard what you see at the City. There’s a table -- a white table with nametags, a water bottle. You’ll have communication. You’ll have the service lead; that would be -- throughout Covid, it was Public Health. Through other crisis, it might have been Hydro Ottawa. It might have been a city official, the mayor, and maybe other jurisdiction. I didn’t see that white table during this situation, ever. And out of all the crises I’ve seen, it’s a bit unique that I didn’t see that and I’d love -- he’s never -- I’ve never asked; he’s never explained it; but that to me is, like -- as someone who’s lived the crisis at the City of Ottawa, it’s atypical of not seeing that confident, “We have a plan,” informing residents. It came through but it came through the police chief, through police communication, and some City information which was often criticized because of street closures and the tone that was used in City communications and police communications in the first few weeks.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. I want to take you now, just to close, to OTT00030058, and it’s a video, Councillor McKenney, that you filmed. And I believe we talked a little bit about this day that it was filmed but I’ll ask you to confirm it. We’re just going to stop it at 1:50 because I think there was, maybe, audio issues at the very end of the video. So we’ll stop it at 1:50 but we can go ahead and show it. [VIDEO PLAYBACK]
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you. So can you confirm, Councillor McKenney, that this was filmed on the day of the council meeting on February 16?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it was.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And you say in the video, “I don’t know who is counting trucks but I can tell that the street is not cleared.” What was that in reference to?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
So this was a council meeting after the mayor had made some arrangement with one of the convoy organizers to remove trucks from the residential area. That did not happen. And this council meeting was Wednesday. I was very, very concerned -- more than concerned. I was really quite frightened that another weekend would bring, you know, just so much more chaos. We just could not go through another weekend. And I was very concerned -- you know, that the mayor was relaying to council and to the public that trucks had been relocated off of residential streets. I decided, you know, probably an hour before council that I had to do something and I went down to Kent Street and I -- you know, I called in council from there to demonstrate that these trucks were still here. I needed people to see what was happening. It was very difficult because you would hear from people -- I would get emails. I got an exceptional amount of hate throughout the whole three and a half weeks but it was getting worse -- personal threats to myself, my family -- and there was so much -- people were dismissing what was happening -- not everyone, of course. I got tremendous support from across the city, people emailing me they saw what was happening and they supported that, but I just did feel that police, the City, or -- had a plan for the weekend. It was Wednesday night -- Wednesday night. We just couldn’t. Friday was the day that it all began again. So it was really a plea and a demonstration to everyone watching, what was happening to people who live here on Kent Street. You can see the residential towers on Kent Street. That’s their front lawn. That’s where they live.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And Councillor McKenney, did anyone give you any kind of assurances or comfort about the plan for that weekend after this video?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, after this video I began to hear more regularly from the interim Police Chief that there was a plan in place. I got more specific information, not detailed, and I wasn’t looking for detailed information, but that there was a plan in place to bring in the resources to end the occupation over the weekend.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And this was Interim Chief Steve Bell?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, it was.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay, thank you. Councillor Fleury, Councillor McKenney spoke about receiving threats to herself and to her family. Did you similarly receive threats? I believe we saw a bit of that in your witness statement, but maybe you can just explain that.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Okay. On the -- after the first weekend and when we saw no movement, there -- us speaking to locals, I was one of the first ones to say, “Stop the funding. Block the funding.” And I went on social media and said that.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
So this is funding to the convoy?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
That's right.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Okay.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
And hours after there were two pickup trucks that -- I have a young family -- came to my home and just yelled absurdities with you know, typical pickup truck with the flags on. And at that point I knew, okay, this is out of control. I had to shut down my own social media and I had to move my family out for the duration.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And was this reported to the police?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I did report it to the council liaison at the time. And we’re walking two responsibilities. I'm responsible for my family’s safety and wellbeing. I'm in a crisis at work. Like, so I've got to protect the family and I think Catherine did the same with their child. And for us then it was back on the ground, back in terms of what could we do. So we had -- we didn’t ask for it. We didn’t want police protection. We wanted police on the ground to clear out the streets and protect our community. But the stuff we had on social media, the threats, the -- you know, my wife is Chinese Canadian. I have a mixed kid. What a beautiful country we’re in. And here I am being threatened like, you know, “This virus comes from China. This guy is linked to China.” Are we real? Like, I’m a local City councillor trying to help my community. I recognize I'm in the capital. Leave us alone.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
And in closing, is there anything that either of you would like to add that we haven’t covered about your experiences with impacts on residents and businesses, the City response, the Police response, or any other matter relating to the convoy in Ottawa? I’ll give you a chance to think about it. Have we covered it, from your perspective?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Natalia Rodriguez, Senior Counsel (POEC)
Thank you both. Those are my questions. Thank you, Commissioner.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay, thank you. We’re going to have to take a break at some point because I think, among other things, the interpreters need some breaks too. I know you all are pretty strong and want to go through and I love the punishment. But I think they need a break. Now, the question is we can start briefly with the Coalition, or break now. I don’t know.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Je peux parler en français, si vous voulez, on peut donner une pause aux interprètes.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Ah, y’a des… y’a des signes ici, alors…
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Ah, d’accord, d’accord. Je m’en excuse.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
So we can take a sort of -- I had thought we’d do it about five o’clock if that’s okay, and you could get started. And unless there’s a different order, I take it. I’m not longer asking whether there’s agreed order, so if there is, let me know. But I'm assuming there isn’t. So is it okay to get started with the Ottawa Coalition and ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
: The only thing I’d say, Commissioner, I think we’re allotted 30 minutes.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Yeah.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
: So I’m not sure if we -- just because of the timing, I’m not sure if you're suggesting for us to start and then break part way through. My preference would be to do all of ours at once.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
We’d do your 30 minutes at once. And then it would be at 5:10 the break. Because I think we’re going to go late, so I'm trying to break it at a good spot. Is that okay? Or do you want a break now?
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
: It would be my preference not to do my full 30 right at this moment.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Well, then let’s take a 15 minute break. Let’s try and keep it to 15 minutes, please. Quinze (15) minutes, s’il vous plait. Merci aux interprètes. Thank you to the interpreters.
The Registrar (POEC)
The Commission is in recess for 15 minutes. La Commmission est levée pour 15 minutes.
Upon recessing at 4:40 p.m.
Upon resuming at 4:59 p.m.
The Registrar (POEC)
Order. The Commission has reconvened. La Commission replend.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. We’re into the last stretch.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
I’m just going to set my time, my stopwatch, Commissioner, to make sure I’m on time or under time. Thank you, Councillors, so much for joining us today. I’m just going to go through ---
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
If you could just introduce yourself for the record ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
I apologize.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
--- and for the witnesses.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thank you, Commissioner. Paul Champ, legal counsel for the Ottawa Coalition for Residents and Businesses, representing community associations and business improvement areas in downtown Ottawa.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. PAUL CHAMP
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Councillor Fleury, I’m going to take you through a few emails and I’d ask the hearing clerk to call them up. The first one is OTT2779. And while that’s being brought up, I just want to ask you, Councillor Fleury, I get the sense from your testimony, do you feel that the occupation in downtown Ottawa wasn’t getting the attention it deserved from the Mayor of Ottawa?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
That’s a tough question. Probably not as ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
From your perspective.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, probably not as serious as early as it should have been. But when it was clear, you know, I didn’t feel resistance. I can put it that way.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Did the Mayor reach out to you personally at any time about to ask you how things were going with you? We’ve heard about these awful threats to your family. At any point did he reach out to you?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Checking in throughout the weeks, I would say it took a while. And I was communicating with different members of his team throughout, so him maybe less so, but through his office in different instances for sure.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Well but like is there any of the personal concern? The human touch? Anything like that between yourself and the Mayor during that time? That difficult time?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, I mean you have to go back to the period. A lot of these were either through text or through Teams or Zoom meetings; right? So you turn on the Zoom, you turn off the Zoom. There’s not that sidebar conversation. There’d be a few texts throughout the last -- during that three weeks, but, you know, nothing that would -- nothing that comes to mind, I’d say.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Okay. We’ve got an email here that’s Ottawa 2779. This is an email from February the 2nd from yourself to the Mayor, and a number of other people, Serge Arpin, that’s his Chief of Staff is my understanding, and Steve Kanellakos, City Manager, Kim Ayotte, and Councillor McKenney. This is you that sent that email at that time?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Expressing the concern for your constituents?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And now at the end -- so you laid out a lot of the issues there. In the end, you ask him, “Please consider the following,” you know, four points that you’re hoping they’d consider. Did you get a response to this email?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I did not.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Could I ask to get Document Ottawa 3893? Great. So this is just a series of emails. If we go to page 2, near the bottom, we see that you’re getting an email here, Councillor Fleury -- a bit lower, lower, there we go. So you’re getting an email from a Mr. Brian O'Hoski. Who is that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
He’s the General Manager of the Rideau Centre.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Okay. And he’s reaching out to you, “Hi Mathieu.” So you interact with him fairly frequently?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes. Yes, he’s -- it’s an important property. He’s also the Chair of the Board of the Downtown Rideau BIA.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Right. And so he’s asking you, “Is it safe or unsafe to open and operate the Rideau Centre? Is there a way to leverage support of OPP or RCMP? Our accountability is to our paying tenants. For five and a half days we’ve been unable to meet that requirement.” (As read) Then we see an email from you just a bit further up, rolling up this time, yeah, thank you, to: “Hi, Steve, Mathieu, Kim, and Chief Sloly, please below see two clear questions from Rideau Centre. Can City and OPS please respond?” (As read) And why did you send this to -- that’s Steve Kanellakos, City Manager, I gather? Kim Ayotte, that’s Head of Bylaw and Emergency Services, Chief Sloly, -- and who is Mathieu Gravel?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
In the Mayor’s -- he’s Mayor’s staff.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Mayor’s staff. Okay. And then if you will just keep rolling up, we’ll see the response that you get: “I forwarded your request to the Councillor Liaison Office.” (As read) That’s Kim Ayotte. That’s the Head of Emergency Operations? Is that right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And he says: “We need to follow a process as we are getting hammered.” (As read) Did you know what Mr. Ayotte meant by that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No. We -- both our offices were getting tons of emails, but the way we were -- the way I was connecting into the City was tactical here. As you can see, we have the largest commercial property asking very direct questions which would influence their ability to open or not.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Yeah. And then you respond: “McKenney and I are both most impacted. I am not flooding your mailbox. Rideau Centre is not just any business. Thank you for your attention to this matter.” (As read) I interpret that as that the communications with Mr. Ayotte was starting to get a little tense. Is that how it was from your perspective, Councillor Fleury?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah. I’m used to the environment where if you go to the top and you’re funneled through a liaison or someone, it’s of lesser importance, or else the management would take action and respond. I thought the email from Brian was very clear and deserved a clear response one way or the other. Two simple questions, not long. Pretty obvious they’d been closed. I mean, he -- Kim would have known that information.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Hearing Clerk, can we get Ottawa 5511? Oh yeah, thank you. And the next page, sorry. Rolling down. Rolling down a bit further. There we go. So here’s an email from Genevieve Dumas from Fairmont. Who is that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
She’s the General Manager at the Château Laurier.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Okay. And to Steve Ball? Who is Mr. Ball.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Mr. Ball is the Executive Director of the Hotel Association here in Ottawa.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
In this email, Ms. Dumas is talking about a sprinkler failure that started a fire alarm and flood in her elevators, and then raises the concern that: “The fire truck couldn’t make it to the hotel. This would be the same case for ambulance. So all hotel in this radius is most likely in this same situation. It could be a major issue in case of real emergencies.” (As read) This is the situation you were telling us about before? Is that right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And then at page 1, we see -- so rolling up. There’s a picture there that we’re rolling up. And you said: “Hi, Chief. See below. What can we do? These seem to be extremely dangerous, life safety, and emergency response challenges. Not sure why OPS wouldn’t have accessed Château Laurier via Saint Patrick and Mackenzie Avenue.” (As read) Did you ever get a substantive response to that, sir?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thank you. Hearing Clerk, Ottawa 8282. Thank you very much. And I’ll take you on this one to the third page, if I could, Hearing Clerk. Keep going. Yeah, there we go. Perfect. There we go. So this is an email from Mr. Brian O’Hoski again from the Rideau Centre to yourself and Andrew Peck, that’s with the Downtown Rideau BIA, on February 15th. And here, Mr. O’Hoski is setting out that issue, he’s setting out a number of issues, problems with the Rideau/Sussex intersection. And then he says: “On a side note, Lamoureux Pumping had parked a red pick-up truck in my underground parking with a diesel fuel supply tank in the back and protesters were going back and forth filling portable gas cans and carrying them out to the demonstration.” (As read) The last sentence is: “That truck is still in my parking lot and I was not supported by bylaw. It’s been over 24 hours.” (As read) That’s the incident you were telling us about before, Councillor Fleury?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, correct. This says a 9-1-1 call that went un-responded to.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Then you get an email from the Council Liaison saying, “Hello, Councillor Fleury,” and then a few other things. And then it says: “The tow was booked for this evening. However, the vehicle left the parking lot beforehand. We’ll continue to monitor the situation.” (As read) And your response to that is -- if you roll up? That’s great right there. No, down a bit. “Thanks for the support, Mat. Obviously I’m glad the truck is gone, but this does raise some major concerns for us. Between the three groups, OPS, Bylaw, and Regulatory Services, still couldn’t manage to tow a single pedestrian vehicle that was engaged in illegal activity from a private lot in a 36-hour window.” (As read) So that was your understanding? It was there for 36 hours?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes. And not removed by authorities.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Thank God no one was injured there. You then -- or pardon me, that’s actually from Mr. O’Hoski. That’s not you. That’s Mr. -- that’s the Rideau Centre saying that.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
You then forward that on to Mr. Ayotte: “See below from the Rideau Centre. What should I answer him? I think he raises a fair point.” (As read) And Mr. Ayotte then writes this longish sort of email to you, and you respond -- if you just go up a bit, roll up, there’s the long from Mr. Ayotte, and then just roll up just a little bit more there. Great. And you just, in a one word -- sentence in response, that says: “I don’t believe this to be satisfactory.” (As read) What was -- why weren’t you happy with that email or why did you find it to be unsatisfactory?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It’s not the type of relationship I’m accustomed to between an important stakeholder and the City of Ottawa.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And then Mr. Ayotte responds: “This is the answer and I’ll leave it up to you to decide if you want to send it.” (As read) So was that a little bit of the tone of your communications with your own Manager of Emergency Operations?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Ottawa 7352. Great. And just roll down a little bit. Perfect. So this is an email that you received from Mr. O’Hoski again on February 15th about -- raising concerns about the Rideau -- sorry, that was the one we just had.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
That’s the same ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Sorry about that. Apologies. But just up a bit. “Hi Diane and Deputy Chief Bell.” So you decided after those exchanges with Ms. Ayotte, you wanted to forward it on to Ms. Deans, the Chair of the ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Police Services Board.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And Deputy Chief Bell; why did you send it on to them?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I’m not known to give up on things that I think are incorrect. I mean I felt that the response not only was inadequate for the seriousness of the situation, but also raised a number of other risk factors that could go unanswered.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Just for time, Councillor, there’s a couple of other documents I was going to put to you but I’m not going to do that, about some concerns about schools, that there was some concerns that schools are raising about the convoy, or it seems to be convoy associated trucks. Can you just tell us what you knew about that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
All the -- so I am francophone and the francophone -- both the francophone boards did connect with me. There are schools in both of our areas and they were wondering what was police recommending, if they should operate or not, they had issues for their staff to get to work, parents were raising concerns and there were a number of incidents where their parking lot was used by a pick-up with flags in the context of the school; and there had been on social media a number of threats of “go attack the school; go around the schools” and, you know, that sort of drove a lot of the concerns from the school boards. And we heard it separately from parents on those same issues. And the Ottawa Police Liaison Team did connect with them in this case. They were -- in the two or three schools that I can think about that were most concerned, the OPS liaison did meet with the principal and I don’t know what ensued of that, but -- the rare communication I got back and forth with police on, in that specific instances, they did take it serious.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Councillor McKenney, on that issue, on schools in your ward, were you hearing concerns about that from those schools or parents with children in those schools?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, from Centennial, which is close to ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
About six blocks?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
It’s about six blocks from here, yes. And also Devonshire, which is not in the Ward I represent, it’s just on the -- just to the west a block or two. But after Pat King had encouraged, you know, people -- his supporters to go around schools, I heard from several parents that that was actually happening in and around Devonshire and I brought that to the attention of Chief Sloly.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And Pat King, that’s one of the organizers that we’ll be hearing from later in the Inquiry. If I could get document Ottawa 30002. Now, Councillors, while I’m waiting for this document, I want to ask you both about like the diesel fumes and so forth that was happening downtown. I’ll just ask you first, Councillor Fleury, were you hearing anything from City staff about any concerns about air quality or the health impacts of diesel fumes in downtown Ottawa from these 400 odd trucks arriving all the time?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No, we were worried. That is one of the aspects around noise and fumes where Council was pretty supportive of our request saying what are the strategies, what are the risks? And the media and experts in that world sort of were speaking publicly to that matter, but we saw few actions to -- other than the injunction, to actually resolve that.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And Councillor McKenney, the same for you. Were you hearing from City staff about issues around air quality because of the diesel fumes in downtown Ottawa?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No, I never heard from City staff on that issue.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And what about -- but were you hearing from residents about what they were experiencing?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Oh, absolutely. The smell of diesel fumes on Kent Street and in that, you know, the center of the occupation, was actually -- made you feel ill after you were there about half an hour or an hour or so. I heard from residents daily about their concerns.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
So this document that I’ve pulled up, it’s an email that you guys did not get, but we see some of the people in on the to’s and the from’s, a Kelly Cochrane, a Todd Piper, Trisha Karam -- that was with the Ottawa Police –- Staff Roberts of the police, Michelle Ferguson with Ottawa. Do you know some of those people, are you familiar with any of those officials or police officers?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I’m not.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I’m familiar with one of the ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
The Public Health.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
The Public Health names, but ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
So this is an email that was sent, disclosed by the City of Ottawa, sent on February the 18th: “Subject: Message from Ottawa Public Health Regarding Convoy- related Air Quality Concerns” and the author writes: “Good morning; sharing with you messaging that OPH ...” (As read) Ottawa Public Health: “... requested that we share with our colleagues who are working or travelling in the P-Z.” (As read) I’m not sure if you know what -- is that a City acronym or something, the P-Z”?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I’ve never heard it before I saw this.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And here is a long email; you’ve had a chance to see this and then I’ll be sharing -- that there’s concerns here about the air quality and about the health impacts from Health Canada as noted, as well as Ottawa Public Health. Had that information been shared with you at the time?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
About the potential: “... the protest become entrenched and had become an ongoing occupation and potential risk and exposure of diesel exhaust and well documented health concerns has increased for those in the impacted areas. As a result, we would like to bring this to your attention and ask that you share this with any agency conducting health and safety risk assessments during the event.” (As read) So that wasn’t brought to your attention?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Councillor McKenney, can I get a document, Ottawa OTT364? While we’re waiting for that, I’d just like to ask you, Councillor Fleury, you’ve told us a bit about the personal impact to you and it was after you had gone on social media talking about fundraising; is that right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, I was saying the only way we’re going to see an end to this, is to stop funding -- stop the funding.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
All right. And who were you trying to communicate to when you put that message out on social media?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I’m a local City Councillor who represents the residents in my community and businesses and within our City. So it’s hard to control that within social media, I hear you, but my communication is to my residents and businesses.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And you were referring to the millions of dollars that was being raised on gofundme to support and keep the protestors here in Ottawa; is that right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And you were looking for some solutions, and whether the City could do something to stop the flow of that money to those individuals?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
All right. And then how far did that social media go that you heard about?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, I mean we had to shut down the platforms and as I said, a few hours later people showed up at my house -- again, I’m a local City Councillor finding myself on Fox News and gets to describe the situation.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
We have this document up, Councillor McKenney, it’s an email from a Jessica Bradley; who is that?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Jessica is the Assistant to Diane Deans.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And this is an email on February the 4th, 2022, “Subject: Block through Centertown” and it’s addressed “Catherine, Sean and Jeff”; those are two other City Councillors saying: “I’m writing this morning to strongly encourage you not to move forward with your planned walk through Centretown today.” (As read) Just for time, not to go through the whole thing, but what was the message you were getting from Councillor Dean’s office as the representative from the Ottawa Police Services Board?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, I believe this came from Councillor Deans through Jessica Bradley’s email, but we were -- we were organizing walks; this would have been the first one that we were organizing. And Councillor Deans did have, you know, certainly concerns, serious concerns that, you know, they would – it would cause resources to be redirected from other areas that police were focussed on. And, you know, she also called me to explain that, you know, she understands why I was doing and why I felt I needed to do what I was doing, but that she was afraid that it would encourage further violence.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Councillor Fleury, there’s one other question I was going to ask you about the By-law, and both of you a little bit. The way you were kind of describing it, outside the red zone there was some enforcement of by-law that you were observing but it seemed to be selective?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
A bit of selective enforcement that it seems trucks associated with the convey weren’t getting tickets but residents in Ottawa were getting tickets?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I described it the other way, but your assumptions align with what I’ve been describing. Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
I’d like to get document Ottawa 29762. Now, Councillors, I want to ask you about one big event that occurred part way through, and that was the removal of the Chair of the Ottawa Police Services Board, and another member of the Police Services Board by motion, and then -- which led to then a few others resigning. That event, as you may recall, there was an Ottawa City Council meeting on February 16th, 2022. We’ve got the in-camera minutes now for that. You participated in that debate that day?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I did.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Councillors, this was a motion brought by one of your colleagues, Councillor Moffatt, to remove Councillor Deans from the Police Services Board? Is that right, Councillor Fleury?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And Councillor McKenney, you participated in that debate that day?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, I did.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Okay. And just for point of time, we’ve seen some of the comments that you’ve made, both of you, but I do have one -- or a couple of questions for each of you. If I could go to page 4? And down near the bottom. Yeah, that’s perfect. You’ll see there: “Councillor McKenney noted that save for a few councillors that had reached out to them and offered help, other members had done nothing. They indicated they’d not received any calls from the City Manager or the General Manager of Emergency, Protected Services. The councillor noted that Councillor Deans had reached out. Councillor McKenney expressed opposition to the motion to remove members from the Ottawa Police Board, arguing it was a power grab.” (As read) Can you tell us -- oh, I apologize, it goes over to the next page. Sorry.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Scroll down ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Scroll down to the next page. I apologize. Can you tell us, what was the point that you were making there, Councillor McKenney? What was your concern about the removal of the Chair of the Ottawa Police Services Board in the middle of this crisis in the city?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Well this was February 16th. This was the day that I called into council from Kent Street and then I rushed home on LRT to get back in time for in-camera. I had to be in the secure space. So I had just gotten back to my home. The notion that Councillor Deans would be removed as Chair of the Police Services Board in what was the middle of, you know, a crisis in our city, we had a police chief who had resigned, we needed action. We needed stability. I was terrified of going into another weekend where, you know, the actions of harassment and intimidation were just increasing every weekend. And I felt very strongly that the Mayor and some members of council, but certainly the Mayor, was using this to take away any influence that Councillor Deans had vis a vie the Police Services Board and I referred to it as a power grab.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Do you recall how much did you have about this motion and what its objective or purpose was?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Not -- in that afternoon -- that afternoon, I figured it was coming. I had been in contact with Councillor Deans. I was trying to do everything I could to get resolution to what was happening. So I did have -- there was some indication that, you know, that there was something happening. I wasn’t brought into those conversations, of course, but when the motion dropped, it was -- it had never been communicated to me anyway.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And this has been -- sorry, Councillor Fleury.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I just think, you know, we see it maybe a bit differently for different reasons, but you have to consider the day.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Yeah.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
We have a council meeting that’s booked early afternoon with the Police Services Board in the morning. That Police Services Board pushes this into the evening. When we get out of that -- when they get out of that Police Services Board, we’re informed that the Chief is no longer the Chief.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Right.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
And then we walk into council and then everything -- we’re learning about this. We go in-camera, and then, you know, you could read through it. it’s like, “Oh, DC Bell will execute, but we have someone else aligned.” There’s a chaos within a chaos; right? So my perception is, to Councillor McKenney’s point, we need stability at this point. We need to get -- dismantle this. We need the operations; right? And there’s a number of things that led to the Sloly situation, but I just think just taking that -- those minutes without the context, ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Right.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
--- maybe misses some of the nuances.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
For sure. And so just the context was that the Chief had resigned, Chief Sloly had resigned, and then the Board had reached an agreement with another retired chief from another police services and wanted him to come in just on an interim or short-term basis to lead the police service and some people were concerned, “Well why don’t we just have the Deputy Chief Bell remain as interim chief?” That was the sort of -- that was the context?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And your view is, why bring in someone else? Just have Deputy Chief Bell stay in charge?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
My view is this new hire is not coming in fast enough.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Right.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
DC Bell is in place. We need dismantling. People have been asking us for three weeks.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Can you recall what Councillor Deans said about why she didn’t want to leave Deputy Chief Bell in charge as chief? Did she have any concerns with his leadership at that time?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t remember.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Councillor McKenney?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No, none that she expressed to me.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And you had asked, Councillor Fleury, about, well, what was the Board going to do if the former chief had not resigned? Do you recall that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And do you recall what Councillor Deans said to you?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I think it’s well scripted in that piece that you had -- you shared these documents. It was apparently a mutual agreement to resignation.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
You were asking well what -- if Sloly didn’t resign. If Chief Sloly didn’t ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Oh.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
--- resign, what were you going to do? Or did you have concerns?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I’m asking ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
She said something like, “Well we did have concerns he didn’t have a plan.”
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct. I’m asking that in the spirit of what was happening with Sloly, where initially he said this is not a police matter, there’s a political fix, then he said, “Well, we need additional resources.” Then all of us, under the pressure of the residents and community was saying, “What’s your plan?” And then all of that tangled over the days, the hours, and then eventually this resignation.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Could I get document OTT 8026? Now, this is an email that we’re beginning up, Councillor McKenney, that you sent on February 17th Deputy-- well, Interim Chief Bell at this point. And you say: “There is significant police action this morning. Should residents in Centretown be sheltering in place? Should they evacuate today? What are we doing to keep kids in schools safe? Has anything been communicated to people affected by the movement against this occupation?” (As read) And then we’ll see there’s an exchange up there that you weren’t in on between Robyn Guest and Serge Arpin. It’s a good question. Did you get an answer to your good question?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I did get an answer from the Interim Police Chief Steve Bell.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Can you recall what he said to you?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
My recollection is that he said there was no need to shelter in place or for any evacuation and that he would keep me updated as the operations moved along.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Could I get document OTT 25001? I’m hoping I got that right. I recognize I’m just about out of time, Commissioner. Councillor McKenney, I was going to ask you about access to groceries and grocery stores. Do I have the right one here? Yeah, it is. Just before I get into this document, there’s two major grocery stores in your ward? Is that right?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s correct.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And it’s the Independent at Somerset and Bank and ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
--- the Farm Boy at Metcalfe and Gloucester, I guess? Is that right?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Metcalfe Nepean. Yes.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Nepean.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
And did they stay open throughout the occupation?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, they did.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Did they close at any time?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
One -- the Farm Boy closed on one afternoon. It was overtaken by a significant amount of the occupiers. There was a message that had come out that the Independent had also, but in the end, I learned that, in fact, the occupiers had gone into the basement -- into the parking garage underneath, but in fact, the ---
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
Independent ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
--- store didn’t -- the Independent did not close down.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
They just closed down their parking ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, exactly.
Paul Champ, Counsel (Ottawa Coalition of Residents and Businesses)
--- their underground parking lot? Commissioner, I’m just going to respect the time and those are all the questions. Thank you.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Thank you. Next is the Ottawa Police Service.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. DAVID MIGICOVSKY
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Good afternoon, Councillors. Good afternoon, Commissioner. In the interest of trying to save some ---
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Could you -- again, we need ---
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
I’m sorry.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
--- people to introduce themselves for the transcription.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
My name’s David Migicovsky and I appear for the Ottawa Police Service. I apologize for that. In the interest of trying to save a bit of time, I’m going to try not to refer to a document, but if you need the document to assist you, I’m certainly happy to call it up. And so I want to start by talking about the January 26th meeting that the Ottawa Police Chief attended with councillors; do you recall that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And just, Councillor McKenney, I’ll address my remarks -- some of these remarks to you. And then, when I want to address remarks to Councillor Fleury, I’ll address them to you, again in the interest of trying to save some time so that I don’t have you both answer the same question. And I understand that at that meeting, you were specifically -- and that was the meeting with councillors specifically to let them know about what the situation was coming up; is that right?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And, as I understand, at that time, you were told, or the councillors were told that the situation was fluid?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you were also told, or the councillors were also told that the police could not predict what would happen?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That is my recollection, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you were also told that the number -- that they had certain numbers with respect to the expected convoy but those could change within the hour; is that correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That is correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you -- as a result, Chief Sloly advised that area business would therefore have to make decisions for themselves as to whether to stay open or not?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you understood that was because it was such a fluid situation?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And at that meeting, it was also indicated by Chief Sloly that the unpredictable nature -- that this was an unpredictable event; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That was what he said, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And -- thanks very much. And I want to go forward two days to January 28th. I understand further information was provided to council at that time; is that correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
What day of the week is that? Could you ---
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
That would be on the Friday.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Friday, okay.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And I’ll call it up for you if you need the document, Councillor McKenney, but I understand that -- so that was on the Friday and the convoy had started to arrive on Friday; is that correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
The convoy did start to arrive on Friday, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Right. And the largest one, however, came the following day; is that correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And at that meeting, you were advised by the Ottawa Police that again the situation was very fluid and would continue to change?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That was their assessment that they relayed to us, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And I understand on Saturday, January 29th, more information was provided to you. And I wonder if we could call up OPS4225, please. And perhaps we could just scroll down. And I understand, if we look at the -- we see that again you were told, I guess, in the -- I believe in the fifth line, if I’m not mistaken, that the dynamic of the crowd at that time was cooperative but there were isolated incidents. But overall, the crowd, at that time, was peaceful; is that your recollection?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t recall seeing this -- this email.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
You don’t recall seeing it?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No. I mean it doesn’t mean that it didn’t come to me but ---
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
You wouldn’t have any reason to disagree with that information, would you?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Can I ---
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
That was from Mr. Ayotte at the City.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Okay.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And it looks like it ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It wasn’t sent to us.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t -- it wasn’t sent to us. I never saw this.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
This was sent to senior management.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
But I take it you would have no reason to not trust what Mr. Ayotte said?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
We weren’t informed.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
We weren’t -- yeah, I have no idea. I certainly -- we certainly were never given this information -- or this assessment, yeah.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
So, certainly, the information we see was conveyed to lots of people in the City of Ottawa that it was a fluid situation; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That seems to have been conveyed, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And that continued to be your understanding from the first meeting with the Chief, that things were changing; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That is what the Chief conveyed to us, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And I wonder if we could please turn up OTT1930. That is a chain of emails. And I understand that on January 30th, the Chief provided a further update to councillors; is that correct?
Alyssa Tomkins, Counsel (Ott)
I’m going to object. Counsel, can you please provide more information?
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Sure, if we could perhaps scroll down?
Alyssa Tomkins, Counsel (Ott)
I don’t see the document as saying that whatsoever.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
You’ll see --
Alyssa Tomkins, Counsel (Ott)
Okay.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Do you have it now?
Alyssa Tomkins, Counsel (Ott)
M’hm.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Perfect, thanks. The Chief provided update to councillors.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And I see in the first couple of lines that he indicated that there were large crowds but they were being managed at that point in time.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That was his assessment, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And he also indicates that there were some high-risk situations that had been managed by the police?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s what he said here, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And criminal investigations were undertaken?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s what Chief Sloly says, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And he also said -- I wonder if you could scroll down a little further. Yeah, that’s good. He also said, you’ll see -- at the paragraph that starts, “Priorities continue to include…”, you’ll see the next sentence he indicates ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
This is Diane Deans’.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
This was not from the Chief.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
That’s correct. But Diane Dean says -- and this goes to ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I see.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
--- councillors, correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Right.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Right. And so Ms. Deans says in that paragraph that I just took you to: "This work is resource-intensive and police resources are fully stretched and fully engaged." (As read). Correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s what it says.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And I take it you had no reason to disbelieve what she was saying to you?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I did not agree with the assessment after the first weekend, no.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And so you didn’t agree when she said it takes, basically, a lot of resources?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Oh, I agreed with that. What I didn’t agree with was the assessment by the Chief that everything was under control for the weekend.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
I see. And you’ll see that in -- just above where it says, “Ending of the demonstration and departure…,” you’re see: "At this time, due to safety concerns, management of the protest and traffic must take precedence. However, these matters will be responded to as resources become available." (As read). You saw that?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And so I take it what you understood from that was that the police have to prioritize management of the protests due to safety concerns?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And I take it you understood that just as -- I don’t know if you’ve had the unfortunate experience of being in a hospital in recent years but just as in a hospital patients get triaged in emergency, that was going to happen with the police as well.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s what is being indicated here, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Right. And you understand from the situation in a hospital that sometimes the most pressing and serious problems have to be solved first?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That would be my expectation, that the most serious problems would be -- yes, would be resolved first.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And it’s not a question, of course, that somebody else’s problems who’s in the queue are not important but it’s simply a question that there are limited resources; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you understand, obviously, that police also do not have unlimited resources?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That is correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you understand as well that ultimately it took approximately another 2,000 police officers from across the country to help end the occupation along with the approximately 1150 active Ottawa Police Service members, correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That is correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And so you wouldn’t expect, I take it, for Ottawa Police to have 3,150 officers on staff at all times, correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That is correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
It’s a question of what the municipality is prepared to pay and what the taxpayers are prepared to pay in terms of funding of the Police Service, correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes. You don’t staff for surges and need for response. Of course, I understand that, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And on January 31st, you attended another meeting, and that is OPS5187? And if we can just -- that was a meeting with the Chief of Police and the Mayor, correct? And if you want to scroll down, you'll see that it appears, Councillor McKenney, that both you and Councillor Fleury were there. You can see at number 4 there’s a reference to something that you said and you see at number 3 there’s a reference to something that Councillor Fleury said.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Can you scroll down so we see the extent of what this communication is? This is a note summary. Could you ---
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Do you want to go back to the top of the document?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t know these people.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
It was an update from the Chief and then you’ll see at the bottom there are some references to Councillor McKenney and Councillor Fleury, Councillor Luloff. Do you see that?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I see it, yes. I don’t recall this meeting.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Okay. And I see there’s a reference in this memo to the fact that there could be massive risks. Would you accept that that is a realistic assessment of what was going on on January 31st, that there would be massive risks in the City of Ottawa and in the Police Operations at that time?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Massive risks to ---
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Implications to short ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
--- residents?
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
--- medium, and long--term of intervention, especially risk of physical conflict that will ripple across the country.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
So is this the risk to residents?
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
I’m asking you whether you agree that there would be risk implications. Those could be risk implications, of course, to residents, to police officers.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Well, not being a law enforcement expert, I would have to say that if police felt that there were risk implications, my job at the time was to look out for the people that I represent and their needs. Certainly their security needs weren’t being met. But if police here say that there were risk implications, that is their assessment of the situation.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And if we could scroll ---
Alyssa Tomkins, Counsel (Ott)
Mr. Commissioner, the witnesses have said they don’t recall this meeting. So unless my friend can contextualize or maybe help them remember what meeting it was, just putting statements to them when they’ve said they don’t remember being there, is not really going to be of much assistance to the Commission.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Well, let me see if I can help. You have no reason to disagree that these things occurred, do they? You just simply don’t recall that meeting, but you don’t question the document, do you?
Alyssa Tomkins, Counsel (Ott)
I think the councillors need to understand a bit more about the document, that it’s notes from a meeting taken by the OPS and maybe tr to help them recall the meeting.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Commissioner, if the witness -- I didn’t understand that the witness did not agree. Simply, Councillor McKenney indicated she didn’t specifically recall ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
They. My pronouns are they.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
I apologize. They did not specifically recall the meeting.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Well, maybe you can just ask if they can confirm their understanding or what they know about this meeting. And then we can go from there.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Thank you. If we could scroll down, please, to Question 4. There’s a statement and it appears to be attributed to you, Councillor, but perhaps you can tell me if that helps refresh.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Can you just go up a bit to see what these questions are? I think it’s just -- it’s not clear to me either what this is recording.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
It is not entirely clear but you'll see at Question 4 there is something and I'm going to read it to you, Councillor McKenney, and perhaps you can tell me if that refreshes your memory.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I've read it. It does not.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
It does not?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
You know, this was three and a half weeks of constant meetings and, you know, working 15-hour days. I don’t recall every single meeting and thing that was said and brought up. And this is not helping in any way. There’s no context for what this meeting is about. I don’t disagree that it happened.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Sure. So let me try this. So there’s a statement in Number 4 that says, “I appreciate everyone doing their best.” Does that sound like something that you said?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, of course. I don’t disagree that what was put down her attributed to me -- I probably did say I appreciate that everyone is doing their best on January 31st.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And it also indicates you appreciate that everyone is doing their best. It also -- you talked about feedback and frustration increasing, correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That most certainly was happening, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And I take it your feeling, and that of the whole city, presumably was, they wanted this to end, correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
They would have preferred that police never allowed the trucks to come in on non-truck routes and park in their neighbourhood and stay. That was the key of the frustration with what was happening. And then when it couldn’t end, residents could not understand, you know, from what they were seeing, why police couldn’t take more action. And yes, on January 31st, I appreciated that everyone was probably doing their best. But the frustration that came from residents and myself really was that it should have never happened in the first place. We saw what happened in Quebec City. We saw what happened in Toronto. And that frustration just increased when we saw how other police services handled their convoys.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And the situation in Toronto that you referenced, that occurred after the Ottawa situation, correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That is correct.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Throughout it.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you would agree with me that obviously Toronto learned from Ottawa’s experience, correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Well, I can’t speak for them but I would imagine they did.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you're aware that for Rolling Thunder, a different plan was in place because again Ottawa Police learned with the benefit of hindsight, correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Okay. So given where we were on January 31st, you obviously wanted it to end but you understood thee was at that point no magic bullet, correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Oh no, I expected every night when I went to bed to get up the next morning and that there would be an end to it. I had to believe that. It was too dangerous for the residents that I represent to ever consider that this could not end, perhaps not a lone police force, but we also have a federal government and a provincial government that were not stepping in. Nobody else was stepping in. I agreed that we needed much more resources but the fact that it took three and a half weeks is inexcusable.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And ultimately it was solved with more resources under the command of Interim Chief Bell, correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Three and a half weeks later, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And I understand that you're obviously interested in serving your constituents and assisting them with their immediate problems?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you’d agree with me as well that you have a duty to protect your constituents but also the City from harm that may come upon it?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And so if, for example, a resident in your area calls the police or Bylaw because there’s a truck blocking the street, but the people in the car are armed and threatening to detonate a bomb or to kill a hostage if the police move in, you would expect that the police would try and deescalate?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you would not want the police to simply solve the complaint about the residence, about the truck blocking it, if that meant serious bodily injury or death would result to others in the neighbourhood or to the officer?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you would also agree with me that while you’re advocating for your constituents, you recognize that the police may be aware of other information that you aren’t, and that they need to take into account when they address protestors?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And if we could please call up Document 1346, please?
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
What is the -- that’s not a complete identification.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Oh, I’m sorry. It’s OTT 000111346.0001. And if we could look at 1138? There’s an email, Councillor McKenney, from you. Do you see that?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you indicate in the second -- you’re raising a particular issue about your constituents and their fears and concerns; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
With the -- yes, constituents who were living in the middle of the occupation. Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And I see in the second -- the third line, you’d agree with me that there’s much at that point that you did not know that was happening in the background?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Of police operations? That is correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you obviously would not expect the police to share sensitive operational information or intelligence with you?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you recognize the need for the police not to disclose all details?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Hypothetically or? I guess, yeah. I don’t -- I was never looking for details of the operation. I was always looking for protection for the residents who were living in the middle of what became a violent occupation in our city.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And if we see -- look at 1147, Mr. Ayotte’s response to you, he indicates that: “We would not want to take action that would fan the flames and make things more dangerous.” (As read) That strikes you as sensible and reasonable, I take it?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I was looking for protection for residents and I was given absolutely no information why residents that live in the downtown were not being protected.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Let me move on, Councillor Fleury, to ask if you’d be good enough to answer this question. If we could please turn up Document 2779, OTT? And perhaps you could scroll down a bit.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I believe we saw this document earlier today.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
I’m sorry?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I believe we saw this document.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Right. Okay. And so the concern you expressed to the Mayor in the third paragraph relates, again, to the question of resources of the Ottawa Police Service?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And again, you’re seeking more resources?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct. As per the Chief’s requests publicly at that time.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you recognize, obviously, that in the face of this massive demonstration, Ottawa Police Service Officers obviously can’t be everywhere?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I have no opinion.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
They can’t be actively managing a demonstration and doing all of the regular police duties? They have to prioritize things; correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t agree. I’ve stated that as a member of Council on numerous occasions that City of Ottawa paid police officers need to protect and serve residents of Ottawa, not demonstrators that come to our city.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And let me just -- I see my time is coming to an end, so I’ll have many more questions, but we’ll -- I’ll try to just ask a couple now. So if I could ask you, please, to turn to OPS 8245, please? And if you could scroll down? You talked about, Councillor McKenney, a fire at -- or an arson attempt at an apartment on Lisgar; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
It’s in your witness statement and I believe you also mentioned it earlier this afternoon; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you’re obviously aware of what goes on in your community; I take it?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
As much as I can be, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you wouldn’t have any reason -- this contains some details as to the police’s investigation of the arson. You wouldn’t have any reason to suggest that the police didn’t investigate that arson; would you?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No, I believe that they did investigate the arson, the attempted arson.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And you’re aware that two individuals were both charged with arson and a number of other offences?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And in both cases, the media release indicated that they were not associated with the convoy; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes. I did not agree with that, but that is what the media release said.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
You would agree with me, you’ve given me many examples of legitimate concerns of residents during the protests. You would agree with me, however, that there are many examples of situations where the police did take actions to address residents’ concerns during the convoy and did do outreach; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, we did outreach together, as a matter of fact.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And finally, perhaps I can just finish off, I understand your frustration with the level of enforcement that took place in the red zone during the convoy. But you -- if we could please just turn up, just to assist you, OTT 28754? You referenced the injunction that the City ultimately obtained; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Sorry, which injunction is this?
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
You talked about an injunction that the City of Ottawa obtained. Your view was that it was too -- that they should have done it sooner, but you mentioned -- and so that’s the decision of the Associate Chief Justice. I’m just going to ask if you’d be good enough to scroll to paragraph 26? Justice McWatt says: “Nevertheless, over 2,000 tickets for bylaw infractions have been given out since January 28 in relation to the demonstration, specifically 1,732 parking tickets have been issued in the demonstration zone.” (As read)
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
M’hm.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
That’s the red zone; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s what it says, yes.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
From January 28 to February 10, 2022; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And so you would agree with me that there was enforcement, there simply wasn’t enough enforcement? Is that fair?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, absolutely.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
And there was a -- ultimately you agreed with me, I believe, that there was not enough resources available to successfully ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Sorry, your previous question though referred to bylaw; right? We’re talking about the bylaw response here to tickets. So I do agree that there just weren’t enough resources, and I do agree that police did not have -- at this point, police also did not have enough resources. It’s why I called on -- I actually wrote to the Prime Minister begging for resources to come into the city. So, yes, I do agree.
David Migicovsky, Counsel (Ott-OPS)
Thank you, very much, Councillor McKenney, thank you very much, Councillor Fleury, I appreciate that.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Thank you. Next is the convoy organizers, if you have any questions.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. BRENDAN MILLER
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
I’d like to say good morning, but it’s good evening. So I’ll start with yourself ---
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
By introducing yourself, please.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Oh, first -- I am Brendan from Alberta, I’m Brendan Miller; I’m counsel for Freedom Convoy which is an organization that represents the protestors as well as the truckers that were in your City in 2022. So, Mr. Fleury, I want to start just asking you a few questions if you don’t mind. Do you remember sending an email on February 4th, 2022 to Kim Ayotte, Steve Kanellakos, Keith Egil, Serge Arcand, Lucille Collard and Liberal Member of Parliament for Ottawa Centre Yasir Navi with a tweet from the formal federal Attorney- General, Mr. Allan Rock, that stated the City should obtain an injunction to restrain the truck horns on the basis of nuisance; do you remember sending that email?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And I understand that Mr. Ayotte, General Manager of Emergency & Protective Services for the City of Ottawa replied to you; is that right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t believe so; I believe the answer came from Steve K.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
From Steve K himself?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I believe.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And from your recollection what was that answer?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
All options are being looked at.
Can the witness see the document? Is there a reason we are not putting it to him?
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
I was just asking if he remembered, and I’m not permitted to, because I didn’t seek leave prior, so -- and it’s under the rules. So in your evidence, you made use of the term you referred to as “micro aggression”; is that right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I believe so, multiple times.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Is micro aggression, is your understanding of that, that it means verbal and environmental slights?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Je suis francophone, donc, si vous voulez être spécifique sur les mots, il va falloir que vous me le demandiez en français parce que vous me demandez une théorie, une définition, puis malheureusement je ne suis pas assez… ma connaissance de la terminologie en anglais est peut- être inappropriée, Monsieur le commissaire.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Well, je m’appelle Brendan.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I think -- you know, it is funny, but it’s not; I am doing my very best to answer clear questions in English. You asked me a very specific question on a definition; I’m saying ask me -- clarify in French, and I’m glad to specify if it is “yes” or “no”. The specificity of the nuance of a word, I’m uncomfortable in responding to your question.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
One of the words that I put to you, and there’s a few, so “means” “verbal” and “environmental” and “slights” is confusing. What one are you confused about it?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
J’ai expliqué plusieurs fois que, pour moi, les micro-agressions, je sais pas si c'est la bonne terminologie, mais j’essaie de les exprimer, je l’ai exprimé au commissaire que, d’après moi, les éléments qui étaient en périphérie de la zone rouge, je les décrirais comme des micro-agressions. Je peux vous en décrire des micro- agressions. Arriver devant quelqu'un puis retirer son masque, je sais pas ce que vous voulez qu’on décrive comme définition, mais pour moi, ça, c'est un exemple de micro-agression. Rentrer dans un restaurant, être demandé de quitter, puis de t’asseoir sans avoir le droit de rester : une autre micro-agression. Battre un sans-abri : un autre type d’agression. Faire tellement de bruit, tellement de volume qu’on nécessite de fermer une garderie : un autre type d’agression. Puis c'est comme ça que je les ai décrites, Monsieur le commissaire. Moi, pour moi, si on veut, je ne suis pas un avocat, j’ai pas un background en les… spécifique, mais j’essaie de décrire dans la terminologie que je peux, le plus spécifique, ce que j’ai reçu comme informations puis ce que j’ai pu voir.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Thank you. Could someone give him a pair of these so he can understand what I’m saying in English as well please?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Oh, that’s mean.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Is that possible? Do you need this? Would you like one of these for when I question you in English? Because I’m unfortunately incapable of speaking French.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
And I will do my very best to answer in English, but it was – I don’t need it; thank you.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Thank you. So you had said that beating up a homeless person was an aggression, at least the translation that’s what it was; that’s more of an assault. So have you witnessed any homeless people get beaten up by protestors?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No, if you recall my intervention, the Shepherds of Good Hope is located at the corner of King Edward and Murray. There was an incident with a client. The Executive Director reached out to me to inform me of the incident.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And were any charges laid?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I have no clue.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay, who was the individual who was beaten; do you know?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I have no clue.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Thanks. So it was on February 4, 2022 you get that email; were you aware that Chief Sloly as well as the OPP had recommended that the City get an injunction in January -- on January 31?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t believe I was.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And both of you, I take it, none of you were on the Police Commission; correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
All right. And you understand that as general councillors not on the Police Commission are involved with the police -- again, my friend was trying to clarify that with you. The police are independent of the City and they can’t share information that they know or their plans with you; do you know that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Absolutely, I’m ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
My interventions relate to information I have from my community and reports that my community residents and businesses give to the Ottawa Police and making sure that it’s getting the attention and awareness from authorities.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Thank you. So those are some of my questions. The other one I had, what is your relationship with Jexi or Zexi Li; how long have you known here?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I’ve never met Zexi Li, except for when she was recognized as a community builder at City Hall by City Council.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And did you ever also assist, and I’ll move on to yourself, Councillor, but with the distribution of the release agreements and the request of the protestors and truckers, to leave under the auspices of signing a release from the injunction and claim that was filed by Ms. Li?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
You’re asking me?
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Yeah, did you?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I did not.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay, thank you. Those are my questions for you.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Thank you. Councillor, I understand that you do know Ms. Li, is that right?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, I met Ms. Li about a week after the occupation ended.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. But prior to that I understand that from some of the information, that you were handing out some of those leaflets for them to sign and to leave -- if they signed it, they would be released from the class action law suit if they left; you were assisting with that?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, that was -- at the time I had not met Zexi Li, I had friends who had been working in the community and I agreed to go out with them to try to encourage some of the people who were parked on Kent Street, to move along to avoid being part of that class action.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. Thank you. And I think a lot of these actually my friend has gone through most of them. When did Chief Sloly advise you that he needed 1800 officers; do you remember when that was?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I can’t tell you when it was; I do recall that he said that.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay, would you say -- would it be fair to say that he asked for that around February 8th, 2022?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
It would be fair to say that; I can’t say that that’s the exact date; yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And so just to clarify, so when you made that motion in the special Council meeting with respect to having the Ottawa Police Service be taken over by the RCMP, that was on February 7th, 2022; is that fair?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s correct.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. And why did you choose the RCMP and not the OPP?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
At the time, it was -- I was desperate to do anything to bring order into the residential areas. I saw the area around Parliament as being the responsibility of the Federal Government and that is why I asked for federal assistance, which was the RCMP.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Right. In some of the records, a colleague of yours -- I believe you know him -- NDP Member, Provincial Parliament, Joel Harden, he was contacting members in the community and members in the council trying to raise money for of the claim of Ms. Li; do you remember that?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t recall that, no.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And one more question, actually, for you, Mr. Fleury. You said earlier in your evidence that individuals and persons couldn’t live the space where the protestors had set up; is that right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
So how did the protestors live there?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
A big rig, as you know, is quite a significant space and what we saw was very creative ways to live in those spaces, or in the cab, or -- so yeah, I mean I’m not sure what you’re ---
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
So I’m -- these individuals that are living there in the area, of course, are in their houses and as well as in their apartments; correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Who are the individuals in this case?
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
You said it wasn’t livable for the residents, correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Right,
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
If they’re living in their houses and these truckers and protesters are living in their trucks, right ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
You’re saying that, yeah.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. You would also define the trucks as weapons?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And how were those weapons used to assault anyone or hurt them other the horns and the diesel you’ve already spoken about? Is that it?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
The physical nature of the vehicle, which is quite large, and the combination of those are a form of a fortress, a form of a weapon.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. So it’s your view that a truck sitting on the side of a road with somebody sleeping inside of it is a weapon?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay, so ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Talking about the circumstances that created the occupation and created for businesses to not be able to operate safely, for transit services to be able to serve residents of Ottawa, for residents to be able to live in their own units, in their own properties, and walk safely on the streets of Ottawa.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. How many individuals that you know of, since the occupation or the protest has ended, did you know during that time that vacated their residences?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I can’t speak to that.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Okay. And last question, Ms. McKenney -- or Councillor McKenney, you talked in your evidence-in-chief about a counter-protest, correct -- that you attended?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, at Billings Bridge on Riverside, yes.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
And I have to put this to you just -- it’s about a fairness question because there may be evidence about this later. Did you recall seeing at that protest a sign with one of the counter-protests with a swastika on in that stated, “Gas the unvaccinated”? Do you remember seeing that there?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I do not recall seeing that.
Brendan Miller, Counsel (Freedom Corp / Convoy Organizers)
Thank you. Those are my only questions.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Thank you. And thank you for being brief. Next is Former Chief Sloly.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. TOM CURRY
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Oh, Chief Sloly didn’t where he was going.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Yeah.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Former Chief Sloly’s counsel. I looked up to nod hello and I nearly knocked out a monitor. I’m Tom Curry. A couple of things, if I can, in the time that I have with you, you spoke earlier about the meeting of council on the 16th of February, I recall, a long and difficult meeting, you agree?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And at that meeting, a vote was tabled, as you’ve described, to replace Councillor Deans as Chair of the Police Services Board, right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And Councillor McKenney, you voted in opposition to that motion. Councillor Fleury, you divided on that question and though Councillor Deans should resign.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And if I recall the meeting, you thought she should resign on a principled basis, that what had occurred in the Police Services Board meeting earlier that day was a suggestion that another outside police chief be brought into the organization to help solve this problem?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And your -- you thought, for reasons that you’ve explained to the Commissioner, that that was not -- it was not the time to go searching for a new police chief, right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
That is correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Elsewise, if I understand the record, you are a person who has, over time, been very supportive of Councillor Deans and her work on the Police Services Board?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I’d say neutral.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Neutral, all right. Councillor McKenney, you have been very strongly supportive of Councillor Deans in her role as Police Service Board Chair of the City?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I have, yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
At the time the debate about the resignation -- or the replacement, rather, by council, Councillor Deans described the circumstances in which Chief Sloly had operated as the Chief. Do you recall that, both of you?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, I do.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Yes?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And she was a very passionate defender of Chief Sloly’s work, correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, m’hm.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Yes, and in fact, on that question, both of you have been as well, correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And, in fact, Councillor McKenney, you used the language ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Could I clarify? When you’re saying about how I felt about Peter Sloly is about his presence as the Chief in Ottawa, not in the context of the occupation. I just want to clarify my yes there.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Thank you. So I can say up to the -- up -- I don’t know whether you have a date in mind but, up to the period of the occupation, you were a strong supporter of Chief Peter Sloly.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Absolutely.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay. Now, Councillor McKenney, for your part, you described to your councillors -- your fellow councillors and to the public a regret about losing Chief Sloly and felt that he had been scapegoated as a consequence of the events of the occupation leading to his resignation; true?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That’s true.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And you felt so, as you described it then, on the basis that he was the City’s first black police chief?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
That is correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And that he was being, well, to use your language, “scapegoated” over the issues of the occupation; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, what I felt that night in that council meeting was that two people were going to be -- had -- one had felt he needed to resign, the other was being voted off, being the chair of the board, was that we’ve had one black chief of police and this is only the, I think -- believe, second or third or third woman that has every been ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Second, I believe.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, yeah.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Now, then, there -- were -- I know neither of you have been -- you have been multiple-term councillors, I think Councillor McKenney two times ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Three times.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
--- Councillor Fleury three times, yeah? Okay.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I was senior staff before I was ---
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay, so you’ve been around the City a long time. Both of you have described earlier to my friends that you understood that City Council stays out of police operations and Police Services Board has that legal mandate; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct, yes.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Generally, I’d say yes, yeah.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And you were resolute defenders of your ward members and residents in trying to draw on every occasion the attention of the police and the City, of everything that you could to assist your warn residents; correct?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
In a focused way, yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
In a focused way. And understood, each of you, that in the case of the Chief, in the case of the City management, in the case of other, the mayor, presumably, that their mandates were wider than your own; correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Define -- define it.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Well, start with the obvious, the Chief of Police is the Chief of the entire city and not just a single ward?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Of his employees.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct, but he’s the Chief of Police of the entire city.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
He’s the Chief of the Police of the entire city.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Yes, and has issues to address within his mandate that go beyond each of your wards, must take into account those wards, but others?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Of course.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
During the time that you observed him, I appreciate, Councillor Fleury, that you lost confidence in Chief Sloly at some point during the occupation. But what you observed from Chief Sloly was the good faith execution of his duties, correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
During the convoy, you're saying?
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Yes.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Or generally?
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Well, I mean, you tell me. Put it this way. You may disagree with the -- you may have a disagreement about the way things were done or not done ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
M’hm.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
--- but Chief Peter Sloly, you observed, was doing his best, correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I’d like to clarify. I don’t believe so. We -- Council -- he briefed us on the Wednesday and the Thursday before the arrival of the convoy. We as council members had concerns. The truck route and the maintenance of the truck route was one. He informed us that he had legal backing of this information around the Charter. We referenced -- again, I’m asking for clarification on behalf of residents of Ottawa and I to this day still don’t have a legal document either from the Police Services Board or from OPS explaining where that decision came from, what legal environment was that in. So and then you have the Chief Sloly who’s saying, “I need 1800 new officers to resolve this,” at the same time saying, “This is not a policing matter; there’s a political way to fix this.” So that is the erosion of the support that I had for Peter Sloly because if you're sticking to “I need more resources to be able to action”, as the council members we should be aware and other levels of government should be aware. But these two nuances relating to a Charter right to bring the vehicle right to non-truck routes, and this floating of almost into political sphere around -- hey, this is not a policing matter -- is tricky.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
So you've combined a few thoughts. Those occurred on different dates as this evolved, first of all, correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Over the period.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Yeah. And did you ask City Legal for a legal opinion?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
We did.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And di you receive one?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay. And did they give you an explanation that the reason they weren’t going to give you the opinion as to why the weren’t giving you an opinion?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Because they couldn’t speak to what opinion Sloly got.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
No, City Legal.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
That’s what I'm saying. David White, who’s City Legal -- we’ve asked him. I believe Councillor McKenney was in that meeting when we asked and said, “What was the OPS and Chief’s decision to allow truck movement into the area?” And our City Legal is saying, “We don’t know. We’ve not been informed by the Chief of the OPS as to what led to that operational action or inaction.”
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Okay. I’m going to -- I’ll just leave that. I'm going to move along. Other witnesses will have to help us with that. But did you go get your own legal opinion?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
The legal opinion we get is from David White.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And did he give you an opinion?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
On what aspects?
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
The aspects that you needed an opinion about, that you just described to the Commission. What is the legal right of a protestor? When did a legal protest become an illegal occupation? And one that you asked the Commissioner. Did you ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Well, let’s put it this way. When truckers weren’t able to show up at Queen’s Park, when they weren’t able to show up at National Assembly, then we know that our Police Chief’s perception of the Charter was a little nuanced. I didn’t need to seek more. At the time we were living the impacts of the crisis. We’re not going to debate decisions that were already made and have impacts.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
You described to one of my friends earlier, those events occurred afterwards. Everyone on earth learned what happened in Ottawa.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
So did the Charter change during the period?
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Well, I’ll give you an opinion afterwards about that. But Councillor McKenney, can I just have it from you, please, that your observation of Chief Sloly from the beginning to the end was that he exercised his duties to the best of his ability in good faith.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I believe that he did but I also believe that he made an error, whether it was in judgement or he had a legal opinion on what constituted the right to protest, to bring large trucks into the downtown. We were never ever given a satisfactory explanation as to why that was allowed to occur. And from then on I believe that, you know, perhaps -- yes, I do believe that he -- I do believe that he continued to do the best he could, given the circumstances. But I go back to the fact that the trucks should have never been allowed to enter the city.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Every protest that you have ever been involved in in the City of Ottawa was different than this one, correct? This was unprecedented?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Councillor Fleury?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Well, you made an assumption, “participated in”, and I've never participated in one.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Well, you know what I mean by that. I’ll be clearer. No, forgive me, I’ll be clearer if you didn’t know.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Every protest that has occurred in the City of Ottawa from the time that you were a councillor - --
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
An earlier witness said people come, they protest, they leave.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
That’s your experience?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
We have about 100 protests in Ottawa a year.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And you have not had one like this?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
The scale, correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
The scale was larger. The volatility was higher.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
The demeanour of the crowd was angrier?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And it became, as you've pointed out, an occupation, yes?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Because the vehicles were allowed into the downtown, yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Well, the vehicles came to the downtown. Other vehicles have come to your downtown and then left.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Well, let me put it this way. Canada Day happens, and if I decide I want to drive my car up onto Wellington while the street’s shut down, I don’t have a right to do that. I have a right to protest. I've actually been in many protests and probably have obviously with my background. I've gone up to the Hill. I've been at protests but you do not -- nobody has ever given me the Charter right to take a vehicle into a protest. So I do -- you know, I'm not going to submit that the trucks coming in and allowed to park along Queen Elizabeth Drive was ever -- should have ever been allowed.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
You give us the assumption that the size and scale of the protest and the inability to respond is just based on that. I guess what we’re saying back to you is, if the trucks never made it to the zone then we would have had a very different protest.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
I’m sure the Commissioner will take that into account from other witnesses also. I take -- I think we all understand that actually. So then a couple of other quick things. Am I right that both of you supported requesting the federal government to exercise its powers to declare an emergency?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes. By the time that occurred I was desperate. The people who were in the downtown where the occupation was happening were desperate. We needed it to end. And by that point I did support the federal government’s use of the Emergency Act, yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Councillor?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It’s just a little more nuanced to me. We were asking for actions from senior levels of government to get back our city and dismantle the occupation.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
Understood. And you also -- I think you told one of my friends that you endorsed the Chief Sloly’s request for an additional 1800 officers.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Absolutely.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
And understood that the OPS had no adequate resources to deal with what had happened?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
At that point, absolutely.
Tom Curry, Counsel (Peter Sloly)
I have no other questions for you. Thank you.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Thank you.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Thank you. Careful. Okay. Next is the Government of Canada.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. BRENDAN van NIEJENHUIS
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Good evening now, Councillors. My name is Brendan V. and I am one of the lawyers for the Government of Canada in this matter. And I just have a couple of brief questions for you. If we could pull up OTT00006610? This is a disposition document from the council meeting of February 7th. Are you familiar with that meeting?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And this was a meeting in which many different motions were brought and passed with respect to the convoy, yes?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
I just want to focus on a couple of them which the two of you testifying today brought or seconded. The first is if we could carry down to page 10 of the document. And to the one on the bottom of the page there; that’s right, right about there. This is a motion that was moved by you, Councillor McKenney, and seconded by you, Councillor Fleury.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And this was referred to earlier, but this was the motion, if you could just go over to the next page, the top of the next page. This is the motion that was carried asking for the RCMP to assume control of the Parliamentary Precinct, right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And then the next morning -- I don’t think we need to go to the document but the next morning, I believe -- we can if you wish. But Chief Sloly wrote to you and the rest of council to advise about the operation of the Police Services Act and how -- and to provide some of the legal reasons, at least as he was informed of them, why the RCMP could not directly assume enforcement as police of local jurisdiction immediately. Do you recall that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
We saw that document, but if I recall, it’s directly ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
It was ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
--- to the Mayor, not to ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, it wasn’t us.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
--- council.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Excuse me. Okay. Did you see that document though?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Now we did, but I ---
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Now you have.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
--- was not aware.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
All right. Fair enough. Can we move on to page -- the bottom of page 11 of the same document? It just vanished.
Alyssa Tomkins, Counsel (Ott)
Can we show the witnesses the document? Oh, there we are.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
If we just go back to page 11 again? And then this is a motion that you moved, Councillor Fleury, and you seconded, Councillor McKenney; right?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And if you just scroll slightly down the page, this is the motion, I think, referred to earlier with respect to increasing the set fines for offences under municipal bylaws in the POA? Is that right?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And this was passed as well; right?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Just there’s a bit of nuance in what you’re describing. We don’t have the authority to change the fine levels. I believe as it reads there: “Consider making an application to set fine increases.” (As read) That’s to the provincial courts.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay. So that’s as far as this method went?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I believe it was ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
It was ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
--- supported by the Courts ultimately.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay. And then could we lastly go to the motion on page 17? That one there that is moved by Councillor Meehan and seconded by you, Councillor McKenney?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And this motion actually on February the 7th is defeated on an even split vote? Is that right?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
But I take it that both of the two of you were yays in favour of this motion on February the 7th?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
As per record, yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Was that because both of you, from what we’ve heard today, looking at the situation from your perspective as the ward councillors in this area of Ottawa, viewed the circumstances that existed on February the 7th as potentially warranting the invocation of the Federal Emergencies Act, and therefore warranting at least that this be discussed with the Federal Government?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
At that point, yes, it was to enter into discussions.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
When the Act was in fact invoked a week later on February 14th, I think a number of things happened that day. The City of Ottawa also accomplished or was issued an injunction that day; correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And the Emergencies Act was invoked or its invocation was announced by the Prime Minister that day?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Correct.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And I’ll ask you this. Had the circumstances that led you to this view on February the 7th subsided enough to change your view that they warranted this step, at least as far as Ottawa was concerned?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Sorry, ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, I’m not following.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
--- could you repeat -- yeah, the question.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Sorry, ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Subsided?
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
--- had the circumstances changed enough, had they gotten better enough that you ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
No.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
--- to change your view that the ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No, they were worse.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
--- step was warranted?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
They were worse.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It didn’t change our ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah. They were worse.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Okay. And enforcement was not in fact accomplished until after February 14th, when both the Act and the injunction were in place? Is that fair?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
And additional resources were in place from Ontario and the RCMP?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Brendan van Niejenhuis, Counsel (GC)
Thank you. Those are my questions.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Thank you. If I could now call on the Democracy Fund and Citizens for Freedom and JCCF.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. ROB KITTREDGE
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Good evening, councillors. My name is Rob Kittredge and I’ll have just a few short questions for you today. I will direct the first couple to Councillor Fleury. You referred in your testimony to what you called “the occupation”. Would it be fair to say that when you use the term “the occupation”, you’re primarily referring to the various trucks and other vehicles that were illegally parked on downtown Ottawa streets during the protests in February?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Downtown streets? It’s more than the downtown streets. It depends what your downtown is. Officially for us, Catherine McKenney represents the downtown. I don’t represent the downtown.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Right.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
So “the occupation” refers to my area as well.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
I’m happy to expand that to say -- let’s ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Sorry, I’m just ---
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
--- revisit that and say vehicles illegally parked on Ottawa streets?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Sure.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
So you’d agree with that as - --
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yes.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
--- what you mean when you say “the occupation”? You’ve identified a variety of issues that arose during the convoy protests. For example, honking, downtown congestion -- Ottawa congestion, and road blockages, idling vehicles, and related smells and fumes, et cetera. Would you agree that the root cause of all of these issues was the fact that large numbers of vehicles remained illegally parked throughout Ottawa? To put it ---
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
That illegal -- that trucks were able to make their way on non-truck routes in downtown Ottawa, yes.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Okay. If illegal parking could be stopped, what you call “the occupation” would have ended; correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
If the City of Ottawa’s truck routes were followed, and if fluidity of movements on the roadway was respected, and if parking rules were followed, you’re correct.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
In fact, the only way to end what you refer to as “the occupation” was to remove illegally parked vehicles from downtown Ottawa streets? Wouldn’t you agree?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Well prevent them in the first place.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Sure. But once they were there, the only way to end the occupation would be to remove them from the streets; correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
To dismantle.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
To dismantle.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Well it wasn’t just vehicles. There were structures.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Right.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
There were people. There were a number of elements. So when you’re defining vehicle or moving the vehicle off the roadway. It’s a little more complex than that.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Right. But a necessary element to ending the -- what you call “the occupation” would be removing the vehicles from the street?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I’m not sure. The people were moved and we stopped to hear the honking. The vehicles were closed. The ---
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
So you’d be -- sorry, I interrupted you.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, I mean, if you look at the police operations that moved folks off, the vehicles were still in place. Right away, we started to get less complaints and it took a number of hours and days, and yet right away, as soon as the people were moved out of the zone, then operations to remove vehicles and to stop the honking, and the fumes, and the structures was able to begin.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Right. But the end of the occupation came when the vehicles -- well, one of the necessary conditions was that the vehicles were removed?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
When the people were moved out of the zone.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
So you’d be happy to have the vehicles remain on the streets of Ottawa indefinitely?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
A different ---
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
You’d be okay with that?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
It’d be a different issue. A vehicle without people is not an issue. A turned off vehicle, in itself, can be easily moved by authorities. It’s the combination of what I call “the weapon”, their big rig, and the people in and around that activation, fortress of that that created the environment that we’ve been describing all throughout the afternoon.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
All right. In any event, there are laws and bylaws in effect prohibiting illegal parking in the City of Ottawa? Is that correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah, and they’re well used in my area, generally.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Generally.
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
Yeah.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
But in the time leading up to the invocation of the Federal Emergencies Act, you testified that there was no enforcement of parking violations in downtown -- in the downtown Ottawa area? Is that correct?
Mathieu Fleury, Councillor (Ott)
I’ve repeated that the parking rules on the perimetry of the red zone, even when it was called to 3-1-1, were not effectively responded to in the nature that I’m accustomed to by the City of Ottawa.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
All right. I’ll take that. And Councillor McKenney, I just have one quick question for you. Or two quick questions, depending on how you answer. Were you involved in or aware of any discussions regarding taking legal action to enforce performance of the contracts the City had in place with tow truck drivers?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Yes, I was.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
And who were those discussions with?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
Oh, I just understood that there had been discussions with tow truck drivers to remove the large vehicles and that no tow truck drivers would take those contracts.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
All right. Well I’m afraid we might have slightly more than two questions here. But were you aware of any discussions about the City taking legal action to enforce those contracts?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
No, I wasn’t.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
You weren’t? All right. And the City did not take legal action to enforce those contracts?
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I don’t know.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
You’re not aware of ---
Catherine McKenney, Councillor (Ott)
I’m not aware of it, no.
Rob Kittredge, Counsel (DF / CfF / JCCF)
Okay. All right. Well those are my questions. Thank you very much.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
Okay. Thank you. Okay. City of Ottawa?
Alyssa Tomkins, Counsel (Ott)
Alyssa Tomkins for the City of Ottawa. Happy news to everybody, all of the areas which I had hoped to cover have been covered through the examinations today.
Paul Rouleau, Commissioner (POEC)
A nice Friday night gift. Okay. But you get no credit for that in the balance, just so you know. It’s day by day. So that ends for today. I can thank the two witnesses for your contribution. Merci beaucoup for your assistance. Très apprécié. So that ends for today. Earlier than the 7:00 o’clock I threatened. And I wish everyone a nice weekend. We’ll be reconvening at 9:30 on Monday morning and we look forward to the continuation. We adjourn for the day.
The Registrar (POEC)
The Commission is adjourned. La commission est ajournée.
Upon adjourning at 6:41 p.m. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ottawa, Ontario